Effort posts are weak giants with feet of clay, vulnerable like Onix' stuck in the middle of the sea.
Well, jokes on them, this one is decidely below freezing.Hm.
Seeing so much dancing around the subject so much has left me wondering how many people are voting for the dragon because dragons are hot.
Do we get to make ice puns if were dating an Ice person?
I'll effort post after I have cooked and eaten dinner and not a moment sooner! An effort poster is never late picklepikkl. She arrives precisely when she means to....Well, this definitely isn't the voting landscape I expected to see when I woke up.
[X] [ROMANCE] Magister Johann
Dropping my other votes and re-quoting my effortpost:
C'mon, Johann voters! Lend him yourenergyeffortposts!
Hm.
Seeing so much dancing around the subject so much has left me wondering how many people are voting for the dragon because dragons are hot.
To my surprise, this thread is the only place Google can find where the phrase "inherent eroticism of dragons" has been used. But yeah, like vampires, if you start looking at dragons sideways there's things hiding in the implications of their mythological representations.
If they shake a cup of milk and sugar around, do we get ice cream?
Can i stick a magnet to Cython?
He has such a magnetic personality, you could stick words on him
Johann had his eyes set on Skaventech as a means to an end. The equation has changed since he took sight on that target as a newly-minted Magister.
It's not. Vote for the things you actually want. Artificially inflating the non-romance votes won't change who will eventually win the romance voting, it will just make it take longer.
This one is actually cold.Hm.
Seeing so much dancing around the subject so much has left me wondering how many people are voting for the dragon because dragons are hot.
@BoneyM, our work on the lightbulb has "Insight: Agreement", which usually means that there is already a lot of research on the topic and your results are in line with what was achieved previously. Does that mean that the uses of electricity were already studied (presumabl by Celestials) and we just didn't know about it?
"You can use Azyr to make light" has everyone looking at Marsh Lights and saying "yes, we know."
But this one says you can use Azyr to make light without casting a light-related spell. Beyond even that it says that non-Celestial Wizards can build a thing that will make Azyr make light without needing any enchanting other than a generic Azyr battery. It's definitely not practical, but it is pretty unprecedented I'd think."You can use Azyr to make light" has everyone looking at Marsh Lights and saying "yes, we know."
Technically our paper is about using a by product of azyr to make light in a new novel way that doesn't require a wizard being constantly involved.
Seriously, just get a bunch of celestials to create a super lightning maker and hook that sunnuvabitch up to some wiring and you got yourself the beginnings of a power grid!
It might not even need anything remotely novel.Seriously, just get a bunch of celestials to create a super lightning maker and hook that sunnuvabitch up to some wiring and you got yourself the beginnings of a power grid!
It does (slightly) decrease the likelyhood of multiple romance votes winning during the same turn. Ans since some people care about the number of winning romance votes nearly as much as they do about who in particular wins and yet you haven't given players any option to vote on that, it seems like a fair vote if you aren't really passionately in favor or against any of the non-romance options. None of them are mechanically significant or putting us on a firm narrative path after all. And personally I trust you to write something cool even for the social options that I'm not burning to see.
That's not strictly true. Voting for non-romance options can turn "2 romance in the top 4" scenario into "1 romance in the top 4" even if it cannot change who gets 1st place among romance options, and those scenarios are obviously different romance-wise.
Technically our paper is about using a by product of azyr to make light in a new novel way that doesn't require a wizard being constantly involved.
Seriously, just get a bunch of celestials to create a super lightning maker and hook that sunnuvabitch up to some wiring and you got yourself the beginnings of a power grid!
But this one says you can use Azyr to make light without casting a light-related spell. Beyond even that it says that non-Celestial Wizards can build a thing that will make Azyr make light without needing any enchanting other than a generic Azyr battery. It's definitely not practical, but it is pretty unprecedented I'd think.
@BoneyM do we know how much Azyr was actually drained from the Blue Tower to power that device?
It's still undifferentiated Azyr from a battery or powerstone being made to do "a thing" (turning on a light in this case) without additional Azyr-based spellcasting or enchanting being needed. It's like a Muggle inventing the Light spell as long as he has an external mana battery.I don't think anyone has made the distinction between Azyr and the electrical energy if creates yet.