I think we're missing the importance of the suffix -ed
Does it refer to a person, a journey, in the past tense?
Yep, adding '-ed' to the end means that
the noun is in a verb form and is in
the past tense. Possibly in "X'd" or "had X'd" or "will have X'd" form.
--------------------------------------
"In Khazalid almost every noun has a verb form which is usually denoted by '-it'. In the present tense and '-ed' in the past."
As in the example above -- verb signifiers usually appear at the end of words. In Khazalid almost every noun has a verb form which is usually denoted by '-it'. In the present tense and '-ed' in the past. Tenses other than the simple present and past are denoted by additional words before the verb rather than by different endings -- the equivalent to 'will steal' (an skit) in the simple future tense. Although separate words these are often written together as shown.
[4a]
- Skit -- Steal[4a]
- Sked -- Stole[4a]
- Anskit -- will steal[4a]
- Adsked -- had stolen[4a]
- Anadsked -- will have stole[4a]
--------------------------------------
So it's like... it takes the words "Azril" which (as others have said by now) means a silvery metal or weapon-metal, possibly Gromril, or possibly being a reference to K8P itself. Since K8P's name is Vala-Azril-Ungol, Queen of the Silvery Depths, so in a sense it'd make sense to me if somebody used the word "azril" to reference K8P in general. And "Drek - Far, a great distance; great ambition or enterprise."
So it's something like... ... Doh, I dunno. My imagination's failing me here.
Silvery or Argent Wanderer maybe, as an amusing nod to Gandalf's title of the Grey Wanderer.
