Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
If people aren't bothered by the AP expenditure, then we might be able to catch multiple riders, and equip them with different mounts for different purposes. Horses for breaking shield walls, cats for slicing up lone targets, wolves for monsters.

Of course, we're looking at a minimum of 1 AP per rider, possibly even 2, so it's a hefty project to commit to. But it would give us a wide range of tools for different situations.
And then codify every variant. Have an entire zoo's worth of Ulgu-coated Apparitions. :p
 
Skipping right past the very many legal and ethical concerns, a Dhar-fused chimera bolted to Mathilde's soul would get burned apart by the Belt.

Also Dhar near soul is a bit ugh.

That said... Could AV possibly be able to enhance an Apparition without turning into Dhar?

If people aren't bothered by the AP expenditure, then we might be able to catch multiple riders, and equip them with different mounts for different purposes. Horses for breaking shield walls, cats for slicing up lone targets, wolves for monsters.

Of course, we're looking at a minimum of 1 AP per rider, possibly even 2, so it's a hefty project to commit to. But it would give us a wide range of tools for different situations.

We have at least two other types of Apparitions to grab.
 
And then codify every variant. Have an entire zoo's worth of Ulgu-coated Apparitions. :p
After we do it a few times, we could probably codify "And this is how you customise its appearance" down to the relevant variables. Sooner or later the dice-roll for codification comes up box-cars.

It's a horrific waste of AP in the pursuit of shiny reskins, though. This isn't Team Fortress Quest.
 
Oh, wait, how did I not think of this before

[X] The Hunter Count astride a warhorse

Also
[X] Dammerlichtreiter
[X] Mathilde on a warhorse
[X] Knight
-[X] with Mathilde's heraldry
[X] Seviroscope: Visual
[X] Rider: Mounted Wraiths
[X] Rider: Witch-Hunter on Horseback, wearing Abelhelm's face

Few remember what he looks like. We could change that.
[X] Seviroscope: Visual
[X] Rider: Mounted Wraiths

One down 8 to go
Formatting reminder for you all that you want [RIDER] before Apparition votes and [SEVIROSCOPE] before that vote (and not Rider: and Seviroscope: ); otherwise they will tally wrong and need to be manually merged, which is a pain and also makes it harder for people to parse the vote at a glance. Things are already confusing enough!
 
Last edited:
I don't believe that a demigryph is any better overall than a horse here. They're just specialised in fighting different things.
Even if we completely disregard game mechanics from every Warhammer game (tabletop or digital), we know for a fact that Demigryphs are rarer, harder to train, harder to feed and more prestigious to ride. If they weren't a generally better investment than a warhorse on average then they would be a vanity project and a net drain on the Empire if held in any numbers higher than needed for niche problem solving units.

As for specialization, other than mass and momentum on a charge and less instincts to attack individual enemies instead of running in, over and out, what combat advantages do you expect a warhorse to have over a Demigryph? The Demigryph almost definitely wins in a duel between the two. It's the better climber. It can pounce and change direction faster. It has better eyesight. And I'm sure that a Demigryph can, on average, take on more humans with melee weapons attacking it simultaneously than a warhorse could outside of a charge.

Moving on from flesh and blood animals and onto the actual Red Rider chassis, you may have some point about the added complication of training a Red Rider, used to being a horse-man thing, to be something different instead, even if Boney did say that form follows function. But that also means that at least differences in fear reaction or hunger or difficulty to control also are all irrelevant. The only advantages I see is that a horse is more subtle and easier to integrate into most Empire battles alongside other mounts, simply because horses are less rare. Which are fine advantages to have. I'm not dead set against a horse. I just like a Demigryph more.
 
I still don't really get why people are squicked about Mathilde's face being used, but I am absolutely squicked out by the idea of using the face of someone we cared about who died. I think it's an agency thing?
I can't say that's wrong.

But for me, if this is a matter of spreading a story, I'm a lot more into spreading Abelhelm's name around than the Dammelichtreiter or the Unseen Knights or A Giant Cat.
 
I can't say that's wrong.

But for me, if this is a matter of spreading a story, I'm a lot more into spreading Abelhelm's name around than the Dammelichtreiter or the Unseen Knights or A Giant Cat.
And, uh, you don't see anything wrong with having a person who is supposed to be dead running around? No potential problems there?
 
[X] [RIDER] Mist-shrouded Grey Wizard on a Shadowsteed

[X] [RIDER] Knight
-[X] Demigryph Knight

[X] [SEVIROSCOPE] Visual

[X] [RIDER] Mist-shrouded Grey Wizard on a Shadow-Demigryph

[X] [RIDER] Misty Wraith on top of a Demigryph

[X] [RIDER] Misty Wraith on top of a Giant Wolf
 
[X] [RIDER] The Dämmerlichtreiter

The sheer asthetic of this calls to me. Summoning the image of the legend Mathilde left in Silvania and Stirland to defend humanity again is just so cool.

[X] [RIDER] Knight
-[X] Conventional Empire (Mathilde's Heraldry w/Wolf mount)

And the generic store brand version. Less flashy but just as good.

[X] [SEVIROSCOPE] Visual

I want both, but let's go with this one first.
 
Last edited:
For the sake of argument, I tried merging all of the various "it's Mathilde" variants (including ones that specified that she was to be misty, or not have a face, and so on) with Dämmerlichtreiter, and it looks like if you combine the votes (which automatically removes duplicates), the option ends up tied for first place. (Notably, I kept the more generic "grey wizard on shadowsteed" and its variants seperate).

So if you want some form of Mathilde to win, and you aren't presently voting for Dämmerlichtreiter, you may want to consider changing your vote? It's possible that Boney will do the same merging that I did, of course, but there's no guarantee.
 
If people aren't bothered by the AP expenditure, then we might be able to catch multiple riders, and equip them with different mounts for different purposes. Horses for breaking shield walls, cats for slicing up lone targets, wolves for monsters.

Of course, we're looking at a minimum of 1 AP per rider, possibly even 2, so it's a hefty project to commit to. But it would give us a wide range of tools for different situations.
That seems excessive. The biggest reason people voted for the Riders was for getting some more general extra muscle power for a Wind that lacks direct damage in general, not for 'this monster specifically might require Rider #3'.

I imagine that if we want to spend more AP on Apparitions, it'd be to explore the potential of the Whispering Darkness or Black Essence and try to make a different control mechanism to Gehenna's Hounds, so as to take full advantage of their misty nature.

On another note, I'm changing my vote slightly to include the Winter Wolves and the Mounted Wraiths, since Boney noted that most people wouldn't know about Hexwraiths - heck, we the thread forgot about them.
 
So if you want some form of Mathilde to win, and you aren't presently voting for Dämmerlichtreiter, you may want to consider changing your vote? It's possible that Boney will do the same merging that I did, of course, but there's no guarantee.
I asked earlier and he said he was counting them as separate options.
I'd go with Mathilde using the little statues she has one of as a model, and treat it as a separate option.
I suspect the Dammerlichtreiter and Dammerlichtreiter with subvote options are getting merged, though, e.g.:

[] [RIDER] The Dämmerlichtreiter
and
[] [RIDER] The Dämmerlichtreiter
-[] (Mathilde-inspired shadowsteed rider, but extra spooky and specifically shaped to fit the Stirland legend)

Since the second is basically a more specific statement of the thing Boney said he'd already do with the vote. But "Mathilde on a Shadowsteed" and "The Dammerlichtreiter" are not the same vote.
 
perhaps we ought to consult with Roswita before we paste her fathers face onto a "definitely not a demon, trust me bro" and which we intend to hold as our basically slave?
 
I would like to remind people that the coins of Stirland feature the faces of its rulers, and that thus she has many coins with his face on them.

You observe the actions of the workers you hired, you observe the inner mechanisms of the EIC, you see over and over useful items and valuable labour exchanged for shiny metal. And then you look once more at a piece of that shiny metal, seeing not just the composition of it but the markings stamped upon it: a year, the familiar skeleton of Stirland's banner, and causing a clench of sadness in you, Abelhelm's name and his head in profile.

Not just any gold, but gold issued and guaranteed by the Empire...

We don't need to put his face on anything else.
 
Last edited:
Time for some approval voting.

[X] [RIDER] Mist-shrouded Grey Wizard on a Shadow-Demigryph

[X] [RIDER] Mist-shrouded Grey Wizard on a Shadowsteed
[X] [RIDER] Misty Wraith on top of a Demigryph
[X] [RIDER] Six-legged cat
 
Back
Top