Ah yes, the aftermath of a vote where I overthink, doubt every decision I made, and worry that maybe qI focused my arguments towards the worse choice.
That being said, I do agree with
@AbeoLogos that some votes require more information before we can *actually* vote, so that we can draw some lines before actually voting. Otherwise, it just boils down to speculation, and info is really easy to interpret in many ways.
For example, I think the two turn limit means the vote was for which group we'll focus on, leading up to the summit. Abeo read it as how long we'll be the hero of the hour.
And then the one line of confirmation we got, that this is adjacent to the summit. Now, this can either mean that this works parallel to summit prep or that it's beside the summit prep, which, in that case, means its irrelevant to it.
Now, I understand that some parts is this is genuinely because of the ambiguity of language. I also understand that votes do need to have consequences so we can't always get the information, like with the Caldera v Underground vote, which determined who died (Ruan Shen v Shen Hu), but we'll still actually need more info in some cases, like this vote. Information which we were supposed to get 3 turns ago, but didn't. Like, I was okay because we got confirmation that we'll get it next update, but this shouldn't have happened in the first place.
I also agree that this vote doesn't make sense in some ways. I don't believe that we're dropping one clan forever, just until the summit, but we don't actually have to do so. Or at least, CRX should be here. She wasn't, so we were left to rely on old info that we should focus on the Wang or Meng, but we don't know if she's changed her mind. That's another thing.
And my last gripe about this vote was its binary nature. There were four entities which we wanted to work on: The Diao, Central Valley, The Wang, and The Foundations, at least that was my interpretation of it. The fact that the Central Valley and Diao were grouped together and vice-versa made things a bit frustrating, because people kept mixing up the Central Valley and the Diao, and I fully admit that that added some salt for me because they're very different and it was extremely annoying when people thought otherwise. But I digress. A four-way vote about which region and clan to focus on sounded more reasonable to me, so that we could get the Wang and Central Valley.
But then I *also* understand that that decision would have cluttered stuff up and made it more difficult on
@yrsillar to write, and that it's easier to group such things together for votes and in writing, so I guess I can't complain that much in regards to it.
So I'm hoping we get more informed decisions from now on, or that we spend moratorium time discussing both options in full before voting. Or that sometimes, we don't get a vote if it'll just be awkward, like in this case. Like, sometimes I get disappointed when there's no vote, but at the end of the day, I'm here for the story, and if it'd flow better if there's no vote at a juncture for voting sake, I'm okay with that.
Ultimately, I just joined in turn 15, so I don't know the meta problems as well as the grandpas and grandmas of the quest here, or what actually *counts* as a meta problem. I just didn't want one of our only allies to be neglected when the summit was coming up.
This is all just my half-asleep ramblings because I have the unfortunate habit of waking up and reading messages first, so I'm not sure if I'm clearly expressing my thoughts here, but since we're all talking, I thought I'll join in too.
PS: While I struggle to actually do it because, tou know, perceived authority, I do think it's okay to call out Yrsillar if we believe something is not right. Like, he's the author, but at the end of the day, this is an interactive story, and Yrs, like Tsu, is only human so he CAN and WILL make mistakes and forget things. It's our job to notice them and give help and criticism. It just depends on how we go about it and the tone we set.