She would have been a sore winner exactly in all those cases if she had taken them as losses, though in some of those she thankfully was aware enough to know those were a win.
Ling Qi's attack on Yan Renshu destroyed his three bases and meant he was utterly unable to do anything anymore (Fu Xiang flat out said we shattered his power there) and Ling Qi made out from there with around 4GSS worth of items... and paid 200YSS. If Ling Qi consider had considered that a 'loss', she would be a stupidly sore winner. Thankfully, she gushed afterward on how well she made off there, so she didn't.
Ling Qi did Elder Jiao's test near perfectly, and she knew it. Thankfully this wasn't a case of Ling Qi feeling she had a loss either, as she was aware of how well she did there. The only sadness she had there was about Xiulan. That you think that anything that's not completely perfect is a loss is, I think, the issue. Ling Qi did a perfect on the Ogodei test, then did nigh-perfect on the Western Jungle test. She would have done perfect had she survived a couple more hours, but this was a test designed to make Ling Qi understand that a victory is relative, and Ling Qi understood it.
No, the real issue with Ling Qi being a sore winner comes from Sun Liling and King of the forest. In the former case of Sun Liling, she beat someone who vastly overpowered her and managed to utterly cripple Liling. In the latter, she managed to succeed at everything she set out to do and had more reward than she expected from her incredible successes.
Rewards are not "all that it takes" for a win. What a win needs is for Ling Qi to show herself as blasting through the tests and achieving everything she had set out to do. Like how a win doesn't need to have her be 'totally crippling her enemies', her loss don't need to be 'totally crippling Ling Qi'... However, Ling Qi did manage to 'totally cripple Sun Liling and Yan Renshu', and in the former cases she felt like it was a loss.
So, sore winner.
Ji Rong, though? Ji Rong's loss were unambiguous losses where he didn't manage what he set out to do, and didn't get bonus prize for them. Ji Rong didn't manage to be an enforcer of CRX, he didn't manage to beat Xuan Shi first time in revenge, he didn't manage to punch CRX in growing pains, he didn't manage to ambush GG's people and got captured, he didn't manage his revenge match against Ling Qi.
Can I just take a moment and mention how mistimed this response is? It's been over two weeks and thirty-one pages since the last discussion on this topic, but apparently now is the time to return to it with a post that misdefines terms, tries to redefine what they consider a win is from their previous post, and demonstrates, again, the point that they reject any potential loss as a loss on Ling Qi's part if we got any sort of reward for our activities. And yet, "rewards are not 'all that it takes' for a win. "
That is the deep inconsistency in the logic. The fundamental flaw in this "Ling Qi has never suffered loss" narrative. Even the new definition of a win is inconsistent with what they call a win at the beginning of the post. Unless, of course, the Yan Renshu raid is mischaracterized completely, the original goals for the raid revised, and we begin indulging in revisionist history. Should those things happen, then I suppose there is no logical disconnect between achieving all of our goals and considering the Yan Renshu raid a win where we didn't achieve all of our goals. I suppose the more charitable alternative would be that they misunderstood my post and were talking about our Grinning Moon task where we did actually complete our objectives and broke his power base, but didn't loose 200ys in the process. So perhaps they are aggregating the two? But saying that we completed all of our objectives in the Yan Renshu raid is at best completely mischaracterizing what happened and at worst disingenuous given that the goal of the raid was to stop Yan Renshu as a threat but after the raid we had to go to Cai Rexiang to broker and enforce peace between us because we feared his capability to strike back.
Furthermore, there are even more inconsistencies in the argument. If what it takes for a win is "for Ling Qi to show herself as blasting through the tests and achieving everything she had set out to do" then the trials weren't a win because we didn't pass the Western Jungle trial. We set out to pass the Western Jungle Trial but failed because we couldn't even last until nightfall. We set out to pass but,
"Then we… passed?" Ling Qi asked hopefully.
"Not entirely," the Elder responded, dashing her hopes. "Nightfall would have been sufficient, but you fell too soon, no top prize for you," he added lightly.
And I see nowhere where we set out to not entirely pass. Now, we can argue whether a partial pass is still a pass but it is clear from the Elder overseeing and judging the trial that we did not entirely pass and if Ling Qi's goal was to pass with full marks then she didn't "achieve... everything she had set out to do." So that can't be a win by the current definition. So either Ling Qi set out to not entirely pass and thus it was a win because she "achieve[ed] everything she had set out to do" or she did set out to entirely pass and thus it wasn't a win because she didn't "achieve... everything she had set out to do." Also, applying this new standard of winning to Xiulan during this trial means that she didn't win if she gunning for Elder tutoring. But... you said that
You can't describe Xiulan's showing in Elder Jiao as a loss given she got an art + Pills + experience. Or her tribulation. Those are wins.
So... which one is it? Did Xiulan win or did... not win? And is the definition of winning that one gets "arts + Pills + experience" or that it is "achieving everything she had set out to do." Or, is it possible that non-playable characters are held to a completely different standard?
Now let's get to the sore winner argument. A sore winner is not someone who believes they lost when other's consider their actions to be a win. Wiktionary defines a sore winner as "one who gloats over victory." And I can find no definition that disagrees with that, even on less reputable sources. Nothing you point to depicts Ling Qi gloating over Yan Renshu or Sun Liling about her victory. Nothing you point to depicts Ling Qi gloating over her achievements to others. There is one scene I remember where Ling Qi has pride in her accomplishments internally, but that is not gloating. So everything you point out about sore winning is misdefining sore winning and using that misdefinition to demonstrate your argument.
As to your point about Ji Rong... using your brand spanking new definition of achieving objectives then I would agree with you. Ji Rong isn't a winner. If you use the bonus rewards definition (which for some reason you want to do still) then I disagree with you. Ji Rong got access to Sun resources because of his imprisonment by Xuan Shi. He got training from Hell because of his capture at the hands of GG. If Ji Rong hadn't been imprisoned, then Sun might not have been able to convince him to join her cause. At least Cai has that belief. And if he hadn't gotten captured by GG then he would have most likely continued on engaging in raids and would not have received his training from Hell. There is a direct link between two of his losses and rewards, which would make him a winner by your rewards definition. But you have two definitions going on right now, achieving objectives and getting rewards. Which one would you like to stick to?
So, in conclusion, your characterization of the Yan Renshu raid is terrible given that we didn't accomplish our objective of removing Yan Renshu as a threat. This is demonstrated by our actions in getting Cai Rexiang to deal with Yan Renshu after the raid. So we didn't accomplish our objective and yet you characterize it as a win because a win is "Ling Qi to show herself as blasting through the tests and achieving everything she had set out to do." You have two definitions floating out there as to what a win is and no indication as to which one you consider more valid. Your definition of a sore winner is completely inaccurate. And finally, you give Ji Rong special treatment and place him on a pedestal of losers despite him receiving opportunities and rewards causally connected to his losses which contradicts your reward definition of winning.