wolfemaster01
Sanity in Madness
Some African nations, local nationsm Thailand some others? Vietnam is still at war and we may invade a few of the locals because their governments are stupidly corrupt and negligent
You could, but not even the Autonomous Australian Communist Communes (Working Title), or AACCWTs, would forgive you for inviting an Australians natural enemy after they lost the Great Emu War decisively.
add Egypt , they are a major player in the middle east and decidedly neutral
USSR walks into the room and idly speculates about why you're trying to poach their Marches.Invites for all the communists plus India and minus the big ones
Good idea, hadn't thought of thatadd Egypt , they are a major player in the middle east and decidedly neutral
How would it work if we did invite Warsaw Pact countries/Soviet marches?USSR walks into the room and idly speculates about why you're trying to poach their Marches.
No Laos, no Thailand, no Indonesia/Malaysia, and including Cambodia who still has a Pol Pot thatSo...
[] Invites for all the communists plus India and minus the big ones
-[] Yugoslavia
-[] Albania
-[] Mongolia
-[] North Korea
-[] Palestine
-[] East Germany
-[] Poland
-[] Czechoslovakia
-[] Hungary
-[] Romania
-[] Bulgaria
-[] Vietnam
-[] Yemen
-[] Sudan
-[] Somalia
-[] Congo
-[] Ethiopia
-[] Mozambique
-[] Angola
-[] Benin
-[] Cambodia
-[] Afghanistan
-[] India
-[] Seychelles
-[] Grenada
Thoughts?
I edited my post but they'd vote as a block on what the USSR told them to vote on and raise motions to assist the soviet agenda as they did in the UN.How would it work if we did invite Warsaw Pact countries/Soviet marches?
This. I might even be choosy about Africa because it's kinda at the edge of our reach.Personally, I think we should focus on countries outside the sphere of influence of Ussr and US, which pretty much means only countries in Africa and SEA.
The thing is that none of the big players commit that many resources to meddling in Africa. It's an area where second and third-rate powers like France and even Cuba can make their impact felt if they're selective about what they do and where, because the US and the Soviet Union only vaguely care; there's nothing in Africa they can't get somewhere else if they choose.This. I might even be choosy about Africa because it's kinda at the edge of our reach.
CyPac is (from what @CyberEnby told me, correct me if I am wrong) an economic, research, and political alliance, not a military or defensive one.the distance is something of a problem, and to truly grow the alliance we'll need a stronger navy.
The more Cuba backscratching we can do economically, the more backscratching they'll be willing to do for us medically.I mean, yeah. Real talk, the US almost certainly isn't going to try and invade Cuba, so trying to help them get some of that economic mojo that they otherwise lack and languish for lack of is probably doing them a favor.
For me, the navy is less about it being a military alliance, and more about guaranteeing trade routes and offering even a token defense against blockades and embargos.CyPac is (from what @CyberEnby told me, correct me if I am wrong) an economic, research, and political alliance, not a military or defensive one.
Even ringing up Cuba wouldn't be a problem, as you aren't trying to Dark Souls the US of (middle north) A, but tech up, industrialize, and make the lives of people better through the powers of JOLLY CO-OPERATION!!! (and communism.)
You can do it. We believe in you.
the consequences of your own ideas.
Except we're by definition second world.POV: You watch a country organize an alliance for third-world nations to help each other stand against the superpowers and industrialize without looking at Africa/South America as even a second choice.