Remove ads

That Time I Became A Dictator Of A Small Asian Communist Nation

Voting is open
Reader mode
Should be everything. I'll fix any mistakes tomorrow.
This post was brought to you by Sleepy Posting Gang - We Love Intentional Sleep Deprivation
:V
 
Remove ads
What's going on with our recruits and our fuel? Is that the Chinese Civil war killing our dudes and eating up our fuel reserves?
 
Drakewolfbio said:
How good are the reactors now by the way?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
It's a Molten Salt Reactor in the 1980s. They are good. (And very safe. No Chernobyl for you.)
CyberFemme said:
What's going on with our recruits and our fuel? Is that the Chinese Civil war killing our dudes and eating up our fuel reserves?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
More eating up your soldiers and available recruits to do a lot of suddenly needed jobs. And war is an absolute bitch on fuel, there is suddenly a lot of things drinking it up that had otherwise been left to idle in hangars, docks, and garages.
 
HeroCooky said:
It's a Molten Salt Reactor in the 1980s. They are good. (And very safe. No Chernobyl for you.)
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Now that's understating it a little, Chernobyl was a product of the single least safe reactor design ever put into serialized construction.

Carbon moderated reactors are built, particularly with gas cooled reactors, and if you make the right choices they can be fairly safe (graphite is still the most dangerous moderator - used mostly as a cheaper alternative to heavy water, since much like heavy water it doesn't absorb as many neutrons as light water), but the RBMK design makes none of those 'right choices'. It was designed about being the absolute cheapest and most easily scaled reactor imaginable (the exception being that they didn't fully utilize the advantage of graphite or heavy water moderators, which is that you can design the reactor to run on completely unenriched uranium), at the cost of everything else (also it wouldn't have been the cheapest if they'd gone ahead with building it a containment building, because RBMKs are huge not only in power output but also in physical dimensions, so a sturdy containment building costs about as much as the entire rest of the powerplant, reactor included).

This is no Chernobyl, no Fukushima, and no Three Mile Island :p

(Still don't build the things directly on the coast within fifteen meters of sea level, though - do not taunt Neptune, but rather show adequate respect to his boundaries by building maybe thirty meters above sea level. You never know what the highest recorded tsunami in history will be in forty years time.)
 
HeroCooky said:
[Statistics Bureau]
Housing: -1 (Lacking) / -
Food: -1 (Lacking) / ---
Healthcare: -3 (Teetering On The Edge) / +++++
Fuel: -1 (Lacking) / ----------
Available Recruits: +1 (Surplus) / -----------
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Guangchong is truly living the Cyberpunk lifestyle if our houses is built like they're in the 2100s whilst having the downsides of living in said dystopia.
 
So the list of things to do:
1 keep helping china
solve the lack of:
2 Available Recruits: +1 (Surplus) / -----------
3 Fuel: -1 (Lacking) / ----------
4 Food: -1 (Lacking) / ---
5 Healthcare:-3 (Teetering On The Edge) / +++++ (seems to be improving?)
6 Housing: -1 (Lacking) / -
7 create/bring more educated peoples
8 build consumer goods factories
9 do something to protect the ecology of guangchou
10 do something (if only deciding that it's not our buisness)about the missing nuclear heads
11 further integrate immigrants
12 find out what happened to our citizens at the hands of the Japanese (finding evidence of more of their war crime would be nice too)

am i missing something ?
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Voting is open
Remove ads
Back
Top