Shard
One and Many
- Location
- Malaysia
Histories definitely qualify as books of knowledge, as does philosophy, at least potentially. Religion is a lot more variable, granted, but dismissing history as not really important knowledge strikes me as a really inaccurate thing to do.
And of course, we've seen already that books on cultivation definitely exist in this world, and those definitely qualify as books of knowledge as well.
Books do not truly let you experience other cultures. You experience other cultures by actually experiencing those cultures. Stories, travelogues, all those are things which are best heard upfront. Books only let you see a single snapshot of one curated perspective at most. This is doubly so when the advantage of a book - the ability to be read by multiple people - is being tossed to winds by the simple dint of being in a different language. Is being lost to the fact that someone with Charred Soul can record their personal experiences more faithfully than any book could ever hope to. When I say 'experience those cultures', I mean, talk to those people about their cultures.Why would stories, travelogues and other such literature not be "useful"? That seems like a very narrow-minded view to me - the value of experiencing other cultures and literature is immeasurable. We're in the Carolingian period, when a mass effort by monks is underway to preserve classical learning thanks to Charlemagne. There may be a lot of fairly dull moralising by monks - often still valuable in its own right, given that this sort of writing is often our only written source for figures like King Arthur - but preserved alongside it will be pearls of wisdom from Antiquity.
Even if one insists in looking at things through the narrow lens of "power" it seems very odd to say that stories and folklore are not useful. We're right now about to build a suit of superpowered armour from learning we got via Latin, literally powered by our Saga. We've hidden great secrets of cultivation in poetry. Do you think it never occurred to the boards and mystics of the past to do the same? I would very much like to get a look at the NQ equivalent of Beowulf, for one!
And to answer your other questions in brief, yes, books are expensive. We're rich and have many avenues to make more money. Moreover, this is why I said we could ask permission to copy books - I would like to see some monk's face when we use a Rewrite to instantly learn and train our Fast-Copying Trick or whatever. However many books we can get our mitts on, whether three or thirty three, it's obviously more than we've got now.
To read Latin and English texts, obviously our students would need to be literate in English and Latin. Ideally should learn Greek and French too, if we can find tutors. It wouldn't be much of a school if they didn't learn three or four languages! That's really about the minimum to be considered well read - or even just well travelled - in an early medieval scholastic mieleu.
Instead of finding a book on Frisians, go visit Frisia and talk to Frisians. Instead of finding a book about FInnish magic, talk to our brother Sten about Finnish Cultivation and Magic. Thinking books are the first resort is backwards. For people to have written a book, they had to experience first, then write 2nd-hand. Or get the experience after, then write 3rd-hand. Each passage diminishes the value of information so inscribed.
As for power. I point out that we learned Latin from a person. Not a book. We learned the method by examining an armor. Not a book. Our secrets of cultivation were written by ourselves. For Norsepeople. The power a non-Norseperson could get from our poetry is scant and bare compared to what a Norseperson could, simply by dint of cultivation. The same is true if we were to go and read the NQ equivalent of Beowolf. We had Jerasmus read out the Bible to us for a full sitting and the only insight we got was 'hey maybe we could make a book'.
I have to seriously question what kind of teachers you intend to have available at schools if we expect teachers to know multiple languages. This is not the 21st century. We are literally the one person in the Hading who knows how to read Latin or English once Bartholomew leaves. Nobody here knows how to read Greek or French. People will only follow ideas if they think the idea is a good one. An idea which does not convert to power is a bad one. It's also hideously impractical on many levels.
Do you know how much of a pain is it to teach people a language, let alone multiple, that they're probably never going to use in their life? To read books which will not meaningfully help with their life? You are boondoogling this school project with ideas that are already dead on arrival simply for lack of utility to Norsemen. Not to mention that because books are so f***ing expensive no other schools will bother keeping expensive and difficult to use foreign language books that the vast majority of Norsemen are going to give approximately 0 fucks about.
I don't think shifting plotlines is the best of ideas, just generally. Shifting perspectives within the same plotline, sure, that's a whole lotta character development to be had. But shifting entire stories is.. well, that's just asking for burnout IMO.I had a genius idea for how to do NQ2. You have three options and, no matter what, you will eventually do all three. The only thing is the order you do them in. Each will be shorter, more contained, and more streamlined than NQ1. This way, you'll be able to do all of the stuff you want to do without having to sacrifice one or the other.
Option 1: Sigurdr, Eyvor, and Asgeirr's adventure in Miklagard
Option 2: Halbjorn and Shadow Twins settling Iceland
Option 3: Unborn kids going with Sten to Finland
Thoughts?
0~0~0
I'll call voting in an hour and a half