I would advise against accepting Athenian offer, yes we will gain more money and what some consider to be more leverage on Athens as exporter of Grain to them,but what kind of leverage we have if Athens can always turn towards bosphorus if they feel like it.
But let's see what we will loose, QM himself confirmed that Taras would be ready to embark towards closer relationship with Eretria so alliance with Taras would be possible followed by them joining our league, which would make our goal of Italian Leauge closer to reality.
On other hand Athens won't instantly cut all its ties to us, they will be offended but they will not attack us over it and will continue to have good relationship with us.
Basically any deal with Athens is with temporary gains for us, but at the price of prestige and political loss in Italy as Leauge that we wish for would be out of our grasp.
With all due respect the part in bold seem like a massive stretch to me. Closer relationship leading to an alliance would be possible but that really isn't the same thing as Taras actually accepting to join our hegemonia. Yes we are somewhat more powerfull but they remain very much in the same tier as us, a power to be treated as an equal and not somebody we can hope to have accept our authority over them for the forseable future through anything but decisive military victory. Hegemonia over the whole of the greek cities of Italy is definitely not just around the corner, and would necessitate at least one major war ending in victory to have a shot at happening.
Hell, even a mere regional/local power who was on death door like Kimay only accepted to join the Epulian League with major reluctance. Taras is far more powerfull and isn't in any immediate danger.
Moreover, we have no reasons, really, to think we would loose any prestige with the rest of Italy. I don't know where the idea we would be pupets came from. We are essentially debating a trade deal with a friendship treaty here, nothing more.
I knew it!
Thinking and acting like Hellenes from the start, Hyria is!
Doesn't work that way unfortunately. Hoplitic warfare was adopted in one or another by allot of peoples who aren't greeks. Hell, the very first battle Eretria fought after the
afixe had the Peucetii infantry fought as hoplites, and they certainly weren't all that helenised by this point.
Moreover, the idea that supporting Hyria is somehow gonna make them more Hellenes seem rather odd to me considering the first of the two reasons, one that most peoples supporting granting them autonomy seem to ignore, is that they are facing, in the word of the update, cultural death. The Messapii culture of before the arrival of the Greeks is disapearing and, appart from very specific aspect like Dyonisos they can adapt to their own purposes, they simply don't recognise themselves, and aren't attracted by a culture from whom came so much harm to them and their fellow Lapgives. Hell, it was Kyros Gennadios upcoming arrival in the city that lighted the powderkeg!
OOC both issues (cultural death and the way the nobles acted) are perfectly understandable, indeed legitimate, grievances. I don't blame the people of Hyria one bit for rising in revolt.
IC, however, the cultural causes of the revolt effectively make it an anti-Helenic rising, which mean that realistically supporting it is probably gonna have bad consequences for us down the line.
And that isn't even going into how throwing some of our allies under the after we allowed the Satyr to essentially take over Brention and are seemingly about to accept Ausculos deal slaughter of our allies inside the Dauni Kingdom would be perceived by all the other Pro-Eretria Lapgives leaders...