I will buy-in to Mirai shredding Wasp's air wing, but I share rdfox's skepticism of a single tomahawk outright destroying her.
How would they know to look for the incredibly small thing in the air, instead of large aircraft? The approach vector is skimming along the surface. The only reason a CAP would be at sea level is because of torpedo bombers.Wasp would have had a CAP up that could have made an attempt at intercepting the Tomahawk
Not outright kill, but a hull penetration is near guaranteed. That's what it's designed to do. I can't find any numbers, since everyone likes to talk about the TLAM, and nobody really discusses the TASM, as far as I can tell.there's no way that a 15,000-ton ship is going to suffer that level of catastrophic destruction from a single Tomahawk hit
I'm still calling bullshit. Wasp would have had a CAP up that could have made an attempt at intercepting the Tomahawk, her escorts and organic AA could still have made life very difficult for it (if nothing else, using the "wall of flak" method), there's no way that a 15,000-ton ship is going to suffer that level of catastrophic destruction from a single Tomahawk hit, and, oh yes, we never licensed the TASM anti-ship version of Tomahawk to Japan (because even we dropped it due to issues of "howinhell do you target it without sacrificing all that range it has?").
Still a laughable scene in Zipang. IRL, she was hit by three torps with ~900 lb. warheads pretty much at her avgas tanks and magazine areas, and still took hours to finally sink beneath the waves (after being torped three more times by the USN to scuttle her, to boot). The Tomhawk hit in Zipang occurred near the top of the ship.Second, Wasp's design notes say that she's basically doomed to die like she did OTL from her first serious hit, because she's built pretty incredibly fragile (at least by USN standards) in order to stuff a full up fleet carrier's air wing into her.
Exactly...CAP would be higher in the air...even if they spotted the Tomahawk, it would probably be too late to intercept.How would they know to look for the incredibly small thing in the air, instead of large aircraft? The approach vector is skimming along the surface. The only reason a CAP would be at sea level is because of torpedo bombers.
Not to mention the fact the missile seemed to go straight into the hangar itself before detonating. As we've seen from Midway, any explosions on a carrier's hangar deck is almost-certainly fatal.Not outright kill, but a hull penetration is near guaranteed. That's what it's designed to do. I can't find any numbers, since everyone likes to talk about the TLAM, and nobody really discusses the TASM, as far as I can tell.
Not to mention the fact the missile seemed to go straight into the hangar itself before detonating. As we've seen from Midway, any explosions on a carrier's hangar deck is almost-certainly fatal.
Franklin, Yorktown(5), Enterprise, and Lexington all survived hits to the hangar deck. Wasp is much less durable than any of those four, but a hangar deck explosion is not the automatic death sentence that what happened to all four IJN carriers at Midway implies.
As a side note, the logistics would rapidly catch up to the Mirai since she cannot replace her munitions or fuel. She would have to pick a side ASAP just to get fuel to steam around, never mind reloading consumable munitions. Heck, food would be a problem after a bit..
Indeed. Having watched pretty much all the video Wasp's deck was full of planes about to launch when the missile impacted. The initial explosion was bad but it wasn't that bad but there were a lot of secondary explosions. I'm pretty sure it was those secondary explosions that killed the Wasp there.Another thing is that just by looking at, Wasp was spotting an air strike. Her hangers would've had full avgas, there likely would've been ordinance being loaded up, plus the planes on the deck. The TASM hit would've just ripped her apart.
First thing I thought of when I heard of Zipang's premise way back when was "I'm shocked that Japan still existed enough for there to be an epilogue, but what can you expect from a revisionist wannabe-Japan-wank that ran facefirst into economic reality?"
Second thought was "Time to amp up the realism of my own TL planning by taking the lid off Japan's nastier projects i.e. spreading plague and syphilis among the civilians to try to slow down or at least spite the invaders."
To put it clearly: I, and basically all of East Asia except Japan itself, loathe Japan's revisionism and inability to admit fault.
China sure as hell is never going to talk about exactly how its population came to be 90% ethnic Han, despite being one of the largest countries in the world with the world's largest population.
please understand that its never ever as simple as "they won't apologize"
First thing I thought of when I heard of Zipang's premise way back when was "I'm shocked that Japan still existed enough for there to be an epilogue, but what can you expect from a revisionist wannabe-Japan-wank that ran facefirst into economic reality?"
Second thought was "Time to amp up the realism of my own TL planning by taking the lid off Japan's nastier projects i.e. spreading plague and syphilis among the civilians to try to slow down or at least spite the invaders."
To put it clearly: I, and basically all of East Asia except Japan itself, loathe Japan's revisionism and inability to admit fault.
EDIT: Flapping jaws and thereby passing gas in others' general direction while teaching your kids that you did nothing wrong will never count as admitting fault.
I stumbled onto Zipang about 12 years ago while on a trip to Tokyo and bought the first three volumes dual-language (still have them and willing to sell at this point).
I never really bothered to read further since there was always a better manga on the horizon. I was not aware it finished, or what the epilogue was. Could you tell me what happened?
The epilogue is that the guy who cast the deciding vote to side with Imperial Japan sees a new ship commissioned named the Mirai, and sees its crew, the counterparts of his crew.
Everyone is there, except him, the last survivor of the translocated Mirai and the one who chose its fate.
I am bugfuck astounded that given a longer, harder, nastier war for the Allies that there would be a Japan left to launch any ships in the future. There would be far less room for war fatigue to turn into mercy in such a timeline, and with more atom bombs to throw at Japan along with a ramped-up Operation Starvation... well, anime and manga (and doujins) would not exist as we know them today...
So Japan ultimately loses the war? I assume that borders are pretty much OTL in the post-war era.
Yes, Japan loses.
Japan losing WWII is always inevitable without giving them a ludicrous amount of boost.
The problem is that I cannot see how a longer, nastier war wouldn't end up going the way a lot of war posters called for: annihilationism.
I'm going to stop talking about Zipang now, it's off-topic and I should probably not have responded to the initial prompt about it (discussing what a Japanese time traveller could do, IIRC, in this TL)
The OP have spoken....It's getting a wee-bit excessive, yes. And I really can't believe I have to put this, but:
Can we please stop talking about essentially genocideing the Japanese? I don't much care about how the War may have gone in these circumstances, this isn't the thread for that.
Can we please stop talking about essentially genocideing the Japanese?
snipped for length.
China was historically geographic Extreme Easy Mode with protective mountains/jungles to the southwest, desert to the northwest, etc. protecting it. It ended up fat, decadent and unambitious as a result, at least in territorial ambitions, as holding together was hard enough already.
China is also the least expansionist major historical civilization I am aware of except perhaps Egypt. Its slow growth over many dynasties was driven by diffusion into bordering regions and assimilation, then the next dynasty considering that part of integral China i.e. slow blobbing instead of what the Americans did in their Indian Wars (basically Three Alls back when it was socially acceptable to do it, a massive short-term land grab instead of gradual nibbling).
The Han ethnic identification of today was really put in place by Mongols. Before that, the regionalism was pretty strong between areas of China. Misery under the Mongols led to most of the oppressed groups uniting to strike them down as the Han ethnicity we know today.
The US reached present size in 100 years. China took over 2000 years (Zhou to Yuan) to undergo a more or less comparable increase in claimed land area. Those living in glass houses ought to not throw stones on the subject of expansionism.
Ishihara Shintaro got elected mayor of Tokyo. With his revisionist nationalist political views and proudly expressed "menopausal women are useless and should all die" sentiment, the Japanese show they like and agree with him enough to elect himmayor of a major cityGOVERNOR OF THE CAPITAL.
What impression, exactly, is this supposed to give everyone else? "Oh we're sorry about what happened back then, but we support this guy who says you guys are all full of bullshit and that none of that ever happened. In fact, we support him sooooo much we put him in charge of our capital!"
East Asia will never forget Japan's crimes just by them passing gas in our general direction over and over again, until they change their textbooks at the very least. Continuously telling others you are sorry while telling your own people that you were completely justified means the others are going to see you as the dangerous once and future aggressor.
Flapping jaws mean less than nothing when Japanese textbooks still deny, deny, DENY.
Zipang is just a symptom of that denial.
I hate Japanese denialist movements (including textbook revisionism) about as much as I hate Holocaust deniers, so my apologies if some folks find this rebuttal a bit... uncivil. It is as polite as I can make it without completely losing its flavour.
Not here, not now, especially not after the OP asked you to drop this line of discussion @Guardian54.[/information]