- Location
- North Carolina
Uh. Right. I'm at work, so I don't have the time to go into this, but here's a key difference.
Iowa's belt is inclined outwards. That's to optimize against high-angle long-range fire, which increases the effective thickness of the belt at range. (How much? To give an example, fire coming in at 45 degrees has to penetrate 24 inches of KCA.
Her armor decks are thicker than Hood's, and the first, sacrificial one is meant to trip the fuze of plunging AP bombs and shells.
To be blunt, Iowa is designed to take advantage of her ability to fight at long range, and her armor scheme reflects that. Bismarck's armor scheme is optimized for the close-in brawl, and she's slower than Iowa. Significantly. (Which is a damn funny thing to be saying about a 30-knot battleship. But I digress.)
Iowa, therefore, will be dictating the terms of engagement, and will choose a range that benefits her, rather than benefiting Bismarck.
Huh, didn't know that, well I knew about the speed. Didn't know about the armor being angled. But Bisko could probably take a North Carolina or South Dakota class on and win and she could probably fight off a Standard rather easily.