Changing Destiny (Kancolle)

Now, please, don't make me have to make another of these. Please.
You're asking the people who've missed/ignored the previous, what, two/three* mentions of 'this is not happening' to care on the third/fourth time?
You have more faith in strongly worded statements than I do, and I wish you the best of fortunes with it.

*if it's the Hood rebuild, three counting the in-story part. Everything else, two.
 
2. They're going to want to refit her around the same level Renown got.
That refit (better known as the reconstruction) included new boilers, new engines, new superstructure, new secondaries, additional armor, and took three years (September 1936 - August 1939), twice as long and almost as many pounds as her original construction.

But the fact of the matter is that even the Brits, with the concept of completely overhauling Hood on every level, wanted something that would basically be Renown+. Not a total rebuild. Not something like, I dunno, WeeVee. Renown's refit was pretty extensive all told, but it was still something within the realms of logic.
Renown's modernization was basically a full rebuilt.

Hood would not be torn apart and rebuilt completely.
Then she can't get even a partial Renown treatment.
 
And even if Hood gets additional AA, odds are it will be British gear for logistics reasons. Especially since the US is still technically neutral.
 
I'm actually going to agree with Gosu on this one, in large part because the British have to replace her machinery. IIRC Hood was damaged during the Norway campaign, which means this was before her refit in January 1941, which in turn means her condensers and turbines are in such bad shape that (according to sources I have) she can barely reach 28 knots, and that's with strain. Which means cutting open her deck to get at them, which means she's in for a major rebuild anyway.
 
And that is with the old iron/steel bolts, when did welding come in?
I know, it had it´s problems, especially with iron/steel bolts fine tuned hull plates.
 
Eh, that's not even counting the damage she suffered internally from those 11in Shells detonating inside of her. That had to leave a mark and do considerable damage. Now the point stands, does Hood have an internal or external armor belt? If she has an external armor belt, you can yank that off and put an American Armored Belt on, complete with Special Treatment Steel. So yeah, but given the fact that the United States has a much stronger economic and industrial base, plus more man power they can use. I am willing to bet that Hood will be back in action by late 1941.
 
Eh, that's not even counting the damage she suffered internally from those 11in Shells detonating inside of her. That had to leave a mark and do considerable damage. Now the point stands, does Hood have an internal or external armor belt? If she has an external armor belt, you can yank that off and put an American Armored Belt on, complete with Special Treatment Steel. So yeah, but given the fact that the United States has a much stronger economic and industrial base, plus more man power they can use. I am willing to bet that Hood will be back in action by late 1941.
The US doesn't have the armor manufacturing capacity to spare, considering all the construction they're doing. So no, no yanking the armor belt off and putting a new one in. We've been over this, Thor.
 
The US doesn't have the armor manufacturing capacity to spare, considering all the construction they're doing. So no, no yanking the armor belt off and putting a new one in. We've been over this, Thor.

Oh right, damnit! I forgot, everything was slated to going towards the Washington, the Iowas, and the South Dakotas. Crap, then again it's like 8:00 pm here on Friday, brain is going to be a little mush. However, since they are basically going to be giving Hood a full rebuild. Why not give her a bulbous bow? That ought to improve her sea-keeping, even though it's already great.
 
Now depending on how shot and/or damaged Hood's engines are (and the reduction gears) because the US historically had difficulty in manufacturing reduction gearing large enough for battleships, it may be possible that the US may offer the British an opportunity to make Hood turbo-electric.
 
Now depending on how shot and/or damaged Hood's engines are (and the reduction gears) because the US historically had difficulty in manufacturing reduction gearing large enough for battleships, it may be possible that the US may offer the British an opportunity to make Hood turbo-electric.

Something I bet the Brits would jump at, simply because well, it gives Hood more maneuvering options and the ability to get out of hairy situations like the following one no worse for wear:

When USS Oklahoma (BB-37) sheered out of column to avoid running down an errant destroyer, she intruded on the next column of ships, crossing the Maryland's bow. The Maryland performed an immediate "crash back" to avoid the Oklahoma, decelerating and letting the other battleship pass ahead, only to be confronted with the direct drive turbine USS Arizona (BB-39) vainly trying to back down behind her. Maryland's electric motors were immediately thrown back to flank speed ahead and the turboelectric ship accelerated ahead of the less responsive Arizona.

and capable of doing stuff like this a hell of a lot easier:

It made the last ditch maneuver of "twisting" a ship out of a torpedo's path by backing down one side's shafts while running the opposite side full ahead and applying full rudder toward the backing side more effective.

Hmmm, that "twisting" idea, might be useful in saving Sara from getting whacked by that Japanese Torpedo. Because Sara is Turbo-Electric.
 
Given what was said? Not even new guts, more like a quick fix to let Hood sail more or less okay.

While the idea of the age of the carrier is not upon them just yet, I think Hood will be left crippled, at least speed-wise.

'Good enough' is what they need, not 'ship shape and Bristol fashion'.
 
You're asking the people who've missed/ignored the previous, what, two/three* mentions of 'this is not happening' to care on the third/fourth time?
You have more faith in strongly worded statements than I do, and I wish you the best of fortunes with it.

*if it's the Hood rebuild, three counting the in-story part. Everything else, two.

Have to at least try. I'd prefer not going for the nuclear option, if I can fully avoid it.

Anywho:


Remember the chapter. Hood's engines are in such poor shape now a Standard could catch her. She needs to have a full overhaul of that at the least. Which is...

I'm trying not to spoil my own story here. But I'm also trying to keep the thread from getting derailed so much that a mod has to step in again. I really don't want that.

At any rate, next chapter tonight hopefully.
 
Given what was said? Not even new guts, more like a quick fix to let Hood sail more or less okay.

While the idea of the age of the carrier is not upon them just yet, I think Hood will be left crippled, at least speed-wise.

'Good enough' is what they need, not 'ship shape and Bristol fashion'.
They do need to open up her guts to get her to "good enough". The condensers are liable to give out at any moment and she already stripped a turbine at Mers El Kebir. That's how bad her machinery is: if they don't replace it, she'll be spending half the rest of the war in dock just so she can move. Better to bite the cost and time bullet and replace it all and then not have to worry about further mechanical problems.

Now depending on how shot and/or damaged Hood's engines are (and the reduction gears) because the US historically had difficulty in manufacturing reduction gearing large enough for battleships, it may be possible that the US may offer the British an opportunity to make Hood turbo-electric.
Do we need to put up a damn technical FAQ? Turboelectric is not happening. You basically need to build the ship around the plant, and more importantly, the Navy hasn't built a turboelectric drive since the 1920s. No, it'll be conventional reduction gears.

Oh right, damnit! I forgot, everything was slated to going towards the Washington, the Iowas, and the South Dakotas. Crap, then again it's like 8:00 pm here on Friday, brain is going to be a little mush. However, since they are basically going to be giving Hood a full rebuild. Why not give her a bulbous bow? That ought to improve her sea-keeping, even though it's already great.
Actually, Hood's seakeeping had degraded pretty badly by this point due to extra weight. But that was mostly a freeboard problem. A bulbous bow... well, the US does have considerable experience with the type, and it'd be useful for a high-speed ship like Hood. My gut, though, tells me that there would be too many technical issues with doing so.
 
Which would mean that she would be out of action from December 1940 to either May or June 1941. This also means, that she will probably be sent after Bismarck ASAP, after she comes out of refit, well not better than new, but in a hell of alot better shape than she was in before the Battle of the North Sea. But this will be after Bismarck and company have probably munched on one or two Convoys, depending on when Bismarck sortie's which from the sounds of it, will be close to when she did OTL, which means I pity Convoy HX 127, because if Hood and Prince of Wales hadn't made the intercept and damaged Bismarck, HX 127 would have been on the menu. Fifty-seven merchants, protected by a single Battleship of WWI Vintage, two Destroyers, a Sloop, a Escort Destroyer, and two Corvettes. Well, as Duke Nukem once said: "Welcome to the International House of Pain!"

...I would actually give Revenge the advantage against the German battlegroup. Bismarck isn't all that impressive a warship really, and by 1941 Ramilles *should* have some modern firing controls IIRC. In addition to super charge shells and the general effectiveness of the BL 15" Mk I, unless Schreiber is *really* committed to sinking that convoy, Ramillles is fully capable of fending off Bismarck. The only real threats are Eugen and Blucher, but that's what the DD escort is for - as long as they can protect Ramilles from the Cruisers, HX 127 should be able to defend itself from Schreiber's attack force.
 
They do need to open up her guts to get her to "good enough". The condensers are liable to give out at any moment and she already stripped a turbine at Mers El Kebir. That's how bad her machinery is: if they don't replace it, she'll be spending half the rest of the war in dock just so she can move. Better to bite the cost and time bullet and replace it all and then not have to worry about further mechanical problems.
I'll put it bluntly. then.

Full auxiliary, boiler and turbine repair: up to six months of work.
Full auxiliary, boiler and engine replacement: two to three years of work.

Which do you think the British and US finds acceptable?

Do we need to put up a damn technical FAQ? Turboelectric is not happening. You basically need to build the ship around the plant, and more importantly, the Navy hasn't built a turboelectric drive since the 1920s. No, it'll be conventional reduction gears.
I blame Star Trek and Stargate, where you get new engines with a whole new high speed regime in an afternoon's work.

...I would actually give Revenge the advantage against the German battlegroup.
I'm not sure the British would agree. Those ships were obsolete for a reason.

by 1941 Ramilles *should* have some modern firing controls IIRC.
Did she? Replacing mechanical computers with dimensions measured in meters deep under the armor deck was not a simple procedure. Warspite only got hers during reconstruction.

In addition to super charge shells
They only carried twenty supercharges per gun IIRC and they were very much intended for long range shots on ships where the gun elevation was not improved yet.

Ramillles is fully capable of fending off Bismarck.
The whole point of Rheinubung was that the Germans no longer needed to run from even old battleships. Ramillies is simply not a front line combatant anymore, and Bismarck very much is.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure the British would agree. Those ships were obsolete for a reason.

They were obsolete, but don't forget that HMS Renown, which was just as old and had less offensive firepower, fought off both Scharnhorst and Gneisenau during Operation Weserubung. The R-class BBs were considered obsolete more due to their lack of speed than anything else - aside from that they were remarkably similar to the Queen Elizabeth-class of battleships. The only other major difference was that the in-service Rs only had gunnery radars like the R-class battlecruisers, not the paired gunnery radar/firing computer like the QEs and the more modern BBs had.

Did she? Replacing mechanical computers with dimensions measured in meters deep under the armor deck was not a simple procedure. Warspite only got hers during reconstruction.

Like I said, the R-class BBs didn't get the full reconstruction of internals the QEs did. They lacked the gun firing radar/FCC combo that Warspite had, they only had gunnery radards, so it's not like Ramilles would be able to pull out as decisive a victory as, say, Warspite would be able to assuming Bismarck didn't retreat.

They only carried twenty supercharges per gun IIRC and they were very much intended for long range shots on ships where the gun elevation was not improved yet.

Right, and the R-class BBs like Ramilles never received the improved 15" mounts. Like the QEs, they were stuck with the Mk I turret mounts. Twenty super charges should be enough to cover the time it would take Ramilles to close into 6chr range against Bismarck.

The whole point of Rheinubung was that the Germans no longer needed to run from even old battleships. Ramillies is simply not a front line combatant anymore, and Bismarck very much is.

No, that wasn't the point of Rheinubung at all. Hell, let me quote Grand Admiral Reader directly:

"the objective of the Bismarck is not to defeat enemies of equal strength, but to tie them down in a delaying action, while preserving her combat capacity as much as possible, so as to allow Prinz Eugen to get at the merchant ships in the convoy" and "The primary target in this operation is the enemy's merchant shipping; enemy warships will be engaged only when that objective makes it necessary and it can be done without excessive risk."

Don't forget, the only reason the engagement at the Denmark Strait even happened was because Lindermann disobeyed orders. Had he obeyed Lutjens, the British and German groups likely would not have engaged.

We know that won't be the case this time either because Schreiber intends to attack a convoy but if he thinks he can take HX 127 and escape with all of this ships he's sorely mistaken. If he engages Ramilles' battlegroup he stands a fairly significant chance of losing Blucher, Eugen, or both, and also exposes himself to significant risk that he himself will be sunk. I don't thing Schreiber is that stupid. It's an unnecessary amount of risk if your objective is to sink the convoy rather than the capital ship.

If you want to inflict as much damage and as many casualties as possible however, HX 126 and OB 318 are both examples of convoys that would be much more appealing to hit and are much, much more vulnerable to surface attack, their only escorts being DDs at the largest.
 
Before anyone argues the particulars of Bisko or this battle-

I know this thread :V

-I will make a post in my own history thread and link it here. If one must argue, use the dedicated thread for it.

Please and thank you.
 
Say Sky, how much does our dear time displaced admiral remember of Yamato her spec´s?
And is there anyway he could use this?
Because even if he remembers them, I do not see a easy way for him to use this, unless he can somehow make sure Hornet her B-25(?) strike on Japan, flies over one of the dockyards used for that class it´s construction.
And even then, the camera caring planes were lost, so.....

I ask, because it might just be what is needed to fast track the Montana class, as a speedy bird.
We today know she had nine 18 inchers , but back then...
Is there anything he could use to express a fear of a 18 inch BB capable of doing 27 knots?
Or get a sub near Bungo Strait around 20 October 1941?

Don´t have to answer directly, in story is fine too.
I bet he already doesn´t like the current butterflies, so that could be a big one to worry about, right?
 
Last edited:
It won't work. There were a bunch of rumors that Yamato was bigger than 55,000 tons and that she had eighteen-inch guns... but ONI dismissed them as pure rumor, as A) the Japanese had successfully managed to hide any actual evidence of it, and B) the institutionalized racism of the time had ONI convinced that there was no way Japan could build such things. Thus, if Thompson tried to agitate to get the Montanas built out of fear of Yams, ONI would just write it off as rumors and shoot down the proposals.
 
Why should he do anything about the Yamato class? Isn't it better to let Japan waste resources on them, while the US avoid spending resources worrying about them, just as OTL?
 
Besides, Thompson knows the Yamatos amounted to jack and shit, respectively, in helping Japan's war effort. He doesn't need to bring them up.
 
He has no fucking way to justify having that knowledge.

Not to mention the IJN actually destroyed most of the actual documentation regarding the Yamato-class of battleships. The details we have now are more like what people are able to remember of the design specs.

Not to mention, he knows that they both were pointless in the face of US naval aviation. Because you don't quite seem to understand that Battleships were not all that useful when a Carrier can just continue to launch strikes from far beyond gunnery and detection range. The USN scrapped the Montana class because they realized that more Midways are far more useful in application of military firepower.

-SK
 
Last edited:
Back
Top