Jensaarai
Sing Victory Everlasting
- Pronouns
- They/Them
You're asking the wrong person. I read the story, I didn't pay any attention to the game mechanics.
You're asking the wrong person. I read the story, I didn't pay any attention to the game mechanics.
Yes, due to our training session with Koujirou.
Not true according to very old WoGWF seems impossible to project from, like, pure Impeller.
So, body still matters in some way, irreplaceable by Impeller shenanigans.
The Warrior would no longer have her physical body, the Warrior would have Dual Wave Wave Force manipulation
-5 world also receive a huge boost to the cast's combat abilities, using them as a basis on what Valks can normally do is not a good idea.
Which was based off the quest running on dice, and doesn't say anything about them being able to do things that would be impossible.-5 world also receive a huge boost to the cast's combat abilities, using them as a basis on what Valks can normally do is not a good idea.
Ohwait, I misread what the argument is about.Which was based off the quest running on dice, and doesn't say anything about them being able to do things that would be impossible.
I just found this:Hilarous as that would be, a very literal take on that cosplay would still require her to hide the head away from prying eyes (and impellers)... I would have said more, but then I remembered that Anna doesn't really use her biological systems to live, as IIRC she's using her impeller to deliver the nutrients and whatnot straight to all of her cells.
In light of that, decapitation is but a minor inconvenience. Especially now that Anna has demonstrated ability to greatly extend her Impeller Field, meaning that she can hide the head out of the way where few would think to check upon seeing her dullahan cosplay.
A better general question - how is Valkyrie's Core is stored, and what happens to that storage after potential Valkyrie dismemberment?
Explanation - One of sticking points on Wave Force is that Impeller-made Wave Force (not sure about Higgs-made one) requires a very high Impeller Density, something that can only be achieved in close proximity to the physical body (and/or the core, not sure what's more factually correct). As such the question on where specifically (in relation to expressed body parts) Valkyrie Core is stored is not an idle one - if it's anchored to the brain then Lordgenome cosplay is more viable, otherwise the hapless hypothetical Valkyrie will have to keep the body parts closer together.
Also, on Valkyrie battleships and arcologies:Imagine shining a torch on your hand, bright white circle on your palm. Turn off the flashlight, no more white circle. Take that 2D shape and project it as a 3D sphere instead, suddenly dissapearing upon skin contact. That's basically what synching a core is like.
Arcologies and Valkyrie battleships are no different in operation to a normal Valkyrie frame, components are integrated with the core and then used as per normal. However, due to volume, there's essentially no way to keep all those components in storage, so they stay expressed. Valkyries can also direct frame components to stay expressed even after they desynce a core, but the functions that directly rely on the core to work wouldn't function.
(on which parts of an arcology are synced with the Valkyrie)Only the Simulators, external shell, defenses and internal bulkheads actually. Most of the internal 'padding' isn't.
Valk Battleships tend not to have crews since the Valk along can do everything and then some, but regular battleships do. Engineers and their little posses of drones for maintenance, marines for anti-boarding, a sparse weapon crew who double duty as engineers, a few officers to run the ship and perhaps some higher brass to direct the local environment.
Yeah. You can no more walk through a Valk BB than you can walk through a car engine, all the space in expressed and retracted components is utilised for combat purposes.
Bear with me here. The engagement STRATNET is envisioning is a long grinding fight and in the UN's favor enough to justify keeping Anna's location/deployment secret. And from the standpoint of destroying Antagonists it's correct. YOLO'ing in probably wouldn't make things any better and risks bigger Types checking in on things.
There is another factor to consider. Anna isn't just along as a builder, we're acting as Sandra's bodyguard. A number of fishy developments have been following our dear leader - and the current location is noted to be less than jubilant about the UN as a whole. If Anna sits on the backlines of the eradication of this force its possible the anti-Sandra elements will have a chance to make a move.
Compounding things is that STRATNET is hitting a degenerate case when considering Anna. Trying to whisk her away from a low-risk event almost before she's started, and when she wasn't engaging in any combat-related tasks beforehand, shows that it's considering even very remote risks against Anna as unacceptable. Why can't we teleport in HYW? Or snipe aerial forces to support drones? Something that lets us resume keeping an eye on Sandra without abandoning our schoolmates.
STRATNET would absolutely be fine with that. One life for millions is the whole reason it exists.winking sequence said:
How much do you trust the AI? Does it think killing Sandra is acceptable, if it means it can achieve its goals?
That said notice what STRATNET actually wanted:
It wanted us to go back to the reconstruction efforts which is where Sandra is, because she doesn't have combat permission. It is Anna who is refusing to retreat and thus forcing the compromise of maintaining her position. So people shouldn't be getting paranoid of STRATNET wanting Sandra dead, for now.Avalanche said:
>>[Abort. Reveal of such capacity not appropriate for this situation.]
>>[Addendum; Withdraw from active reserve to previous activity. Conceal location from Antagonists.]
In- or out-of-universe?
I have often wished for the ability to hop forward in time. It would really cut down on my living expenses.
I disagree. Anna is actually more comfortable challenging orders in combat than out of it. And she has a good chance of being better than the system meant to guide her. Tamping down on her urge and judgement now makes it harder for her to question the orders she gets when she has less expertise on the subject.Anna here is a soldier and right now its more important to follow orders in the field than personal opinions. She can still work on to say no when she's not in combat. Not being by Sandra's side is bad but disobaying military orders is way worse.
Oh, it's just the usual Thread Madness as the withdrawal really start to set in and the posters become desperate to keep the thread going for a little longer.Uh...isn't the vote already finished? Why still debate about the vote?
On the other hand if she doesn't immediately show herself she might be able to bag a good kill when the Antags are sure she isn't their.I disagree. Anna is actually more comfortable challenging orders in combat than out of it. And she has a good chance of being better than the system meant to guide her. Tamping down on her urge and judgement now makes it harder for her to question the orders she gets when she has less expertise on the subject.
She can go off like a loose cannon now and submit an 800 page paper about why STRATNET was being dumb later.
kelllogo
I disagree. Anna is actually more comfortable challenging orders in combat than out of it. And she has a good chance of being better than the system meant to guide her. Tamping down on her urge and judgement now makes it harder for her to question the orders she gets when she has less expertise on the subject.
She can go off like a loose cannon now and submit an 800 page paper about why STRATNET was being dumb later.
Keep in mind we have also been informed that as Valkyrie #1 she still has the effective rank of "superior=yes".privilege
If she has better judgement than the system then it would be better to follow her insticts then. However for me its that we don't know her privileges and authority that makes this messed up. We don't know if she has the authority to make her own decision on the battlefield. In Part 7 she had "United Nations Air Force Lieutenant (OF-1)" on her own profile. Meaning that if she would go against a higher ranked officer, nevermind an AI, it would still be strict punishment or something others could hold over her later.
People have been contemplating that and the answer thus far is: Who knows?... Say, is there any chance of getting the language club to make a translation of Anna's unique vocabulary when it comes to talking about impeller techniques?
Spoken word too ambiguous, Anna needs to feed a graph into the algorithm and then walk through it. Output is still several hours worth of densly polysyllabic jargon.... Say, is there any chance of getting the language club to make a translation of Anna's unique vocabulary when it comes to talking about impeller techniques?
The question i have to ask is what exactly could they do to meaningfully punish her with out out right alienating her.If she has better judgement than the system then it would be better to follow her insticts then. However for me its that we don't know her privileges and authority that makes this messed up. We don't know if she has the authority to make her own decision on the battlefield. In Part 7 she had "United Nations Air Force Lieutenant (OF-1)" on her own profile. Meaning that if she would go against a higher ranked officer, nevermind an AI, it would still be strict punishment or something others could hold over her later.
The question i have to ask is what exactly could they do to meaningfully punish her with out out right alienating her.
Issue with that is that they're just crippling themselves without really punishing Anna.Stall her promotions. Give her lectures on how disappointed they are. Take away her chance to even get this close to the fighting in the future. Remove her from the list of persons eligible for relief work in the Line 3 areas. Lots of things, really.