Well Anna was originally supposed to go to an academic only course. Her psychologist said that regular contact with normal humans would be the best way to help her. That and living a peaceful life for several years.

They only gave her the rank simply because she is the only one that can be considered a trump against Type Zeros and in a war that literally has the extinction of mankind as a consequence of losing morals have to be bent.
I know that, I just think they wouldn't be too concerned with something being called 'Monstrous' if the war went badly enough. (Which it likely won't because this is only -1.)
 
Last edited:
I know that, I just think they wouldn't be too concerned with something being called 'Monstrous' if the war went badly enough. (Which it likely won't because this is only -1.)

Actually a -1 setting is one where Humanity has a very real chance of losing, if the Antagonists pulls something other than doing what they have been passivley doing right now then the UN will experience large amounts of problems. Remember that the UN is still seriously outgunned, to the point that they have to get third years to act as reserves regularly, with their troops regularly getting wrecked.

They predict that they might win, but that is in the course of decades. And even at that point they believe that only the major hives will be left. The ones that release a type 0 every single year.

It might seem like a situations that mankind can win, and it is, but the war is still very dire.
 
My opinion is that the -1 is a universe where the UN is on the losing side, but only on a very long time period. If -5 was losing estimated in 2 years, and -3 was a loss in a decade, I say that -1 is a loss in 50 years. And it can be far more easily flipped into a win.

Or, put bluntly, in the -1 universe, humanity is ultimately losing, but only due to attrition, the occasional fuck-up and the fact that the Antagonists haven't pulled out their trump cards yet.

The +1 universe, humanity would be winning, due to the fact there's less fuck-ups. Either situation can easily be flipped into the other by a few significant successes or failures.
 
As far as I can tell, in the -1 universe, the UN predicts that it will win the war forever once the BIG ZAM WAVE FORCE CANNON is mass produced.
 
My opinion is that the -1 is a universe where the UN is on the losing side, but only on a very long time period. If -5 was losing estimated in 2 years, and -3 was a loss in a decade, I say that -1 is a loss in 50 years. And it can be far more easily flipped into a win.

Or, put bluntly, in the -1 universe, humanity is ultimately losing, but only due to attrition, the occasional fuck-up and the fact that the Antagonists haven't pulled out their trump cards yet.

The +1 universe, humanity would be winning, due to the fact there's less fuck-ups. Either situation can easily be flipped into the other by a few significant successes or failures.
I think in the majority of worlds winning is possible, even if winning is defined as sending humanity to another world while earth is taken over. (worst case of -3, best(?) -5)
Still means Humanity could return and take back Earth.
 
Last edited:
Actually a -1 setting is one where Humanity has a very real chance of losing, if the Antagonists pulls something other than doing what they have been passivley doing right now then the UN will experience large amounts of problems. Remember that the UN is still seriously outgunned, to the point that they have to get third years to act as reserves regularly, with their troops regularly getting wrecked.

They predict that they might win, but that is in the course of decades. And even at that point they believe that only the major hives will be left. The ones that release a type 0 every single year.

It might seem like a situations that mankind can win, and it is, but the war is still very dire.

My opinion is that the -1 is a universe where the UN is on the losing side, but only on a very long time period. If -5 was losing estimated in 2 years, and -3 was a loss in a decade, I say that -1 is a loss in 50 years. And it can be far more easily flipped into a win.

Or, put bluntly, in the -1 universe, humanity is ultimately losing, but only due to attrition, the occasional fuck-up and the fact that the Antagonists haven't pulled out their trump cards yet.

The +1 universe, humanity would be winning, due to the fact there's less fuck-ups. Either situation can easily be flipped into the other by a few significant successes or failures.
Actually, things are looking up in this 'verse, and humans are expected to win completely within the decade. The difference between -1 and +1 is the amount of plot armor the MC has.
 
What's funny to me is that, in the original votes, Monster and Broken ace only won by one vote each.

We could have easily been playing +3, and Yukari would hate us all.
 
And? Anna has already had her internal monologue about how she doesn't want to see a hollow replica of Sekhmet. I don't see any narrative value in having her fight a hollow replica of Sekhmet and then report that it's a hollow replica. It's needlessly traumatizing and it's pointless given the earlier scene.
Oh, yeah, I agree with you that it's a bad idea in general.
I also misremembered that this
ALASKAN OFFENSIVE:
>ANCHORAGE BEACH HEAD
>ORBITAL COVER
>FAIRBANKS BREACH
>FAIRBANKS HIVE
>COASTAL PUSH
>LOS ANGELES BREACH
>LOS ANGELES HIVE
>CLASS B TYPE ZERO AEON
>CLASS C TYPE ZERO SEKHMET
had a Saskatoon breach option, in which case Anna's input might have been useful, even if actually getting to the point where she could critique the simulation is a bad idea in the first place.

Soo...yeah. My earlier comment was base off of a faulty memory. Oops.
...
So, did Avalanche ever clarify what most of the colors on that map meant?
 
Last edited:
My opinion is that the -1 is a universe where the UN is on the losing side, but only on a very long time period. If -5 was losing estimated in 2 years, and -3 was a loss in a decade, I say that -1 is a loss in 50 years. And it can be far more easily flipped into a win.

Or, put bluntly, in the -1 universe, humanity is ultimately losing, but only due to attrition, the occasional fuck-up and the fact that the Antagonists haven't pulled out their trump cards yet.

The +1 universe, humanity would be winning, due to the fact there's less fuck-ups. Either situation can easily be flipped into the other by a few significant successes or failures.

Actually, things are looking up in this 'verse, and humans are expected to win completely within the decade. The difference between -1 and +1 is the amount of plot armor the MC has.


In the -1 setting humanity is still fighting it out rather than deciding to bug it out with their Arcology Space Ships because they are winning the war. They are no longer losing ground and are now retaking land, no matter how slowly.

But it is still a dangerous situation as no one can expect how a war can turn out in a year no matter how good predictions are much less a decade.

And humanity winning in a decade isn't really precise. It would be destroying all breaches except for the major ones and even then the UN should be ready to face off the Antagonists doing something to them losing the war.
 
In the -1 setting humanity is still fighting it out rather than deciding to bug it out with their Arcology Space Ships because they are winning the war. They are no longer losing ground and are now retaking land, no matter how slowly.

But it is still a dangerous situation as no one can expect how a war can turn out in a year no matter how good predictions are much less a decade.

And humanity winning in a decade isn't really precise. It would be destroying all breaches except for the major ones and even then the UN should be ready to face off the Antagonists doing something to them losing the war.
It was word of Avalanche, actually, though I can't bothered to dig through the hundred or so pages that the quote is buried in...
 
As far as I can tell, in the -1 universe, the UN predicts that it will win the war forever once the BIG ZAM WAVE FORCE CANNON is mass produced.
Actually, things are looking up in this 'verse, and humans are expected to win completely within the decade. The difference between -1 and +1 is the amount of plot armor the MC has.
In the -1 setting humanity is still fighting it out rather than deciding to bug it out with their Arcology Space Ships because they are winning the war. They are no longer losing ground and are now retaking land, no matter how slowly.

But it is still a dangerous situation as no one can expect how a war can turn out in a year no matter how good predictions are much less a decade.

And humanity winning in a decade isn't really precise. It would be destroying all breaches except for the major ones and even then the UN should be ready to face off the Antagonists doing something to them losing the war.
Here's the quote:
The thing is, Humanity does not want to abandon Earth. They're winning, and in perhaps a decade, the last of the Minor Breaches should be eliminated leaving on the Major Breaches left. They hope so anyway.
See, we know something that they don't: that the S-class Type Zero's are more then a theoretical.

We also know that there's two minor Breaches moving towards each other, which will potentially form a 7th Major Breach.

And here's an important fact: every time humanity gains an advantage, the Antagonists escalate:
Valkyries. Pretty much the only reason.

Also, humanity was almost annihilated in those first months. The UN left all the areas too close to Breaches to hang and global population once again went into nosedive. Europe, North Africa and CONUS had rebuilt human populations in the years Post Impact and well, no longer.

Casualty and death rates for every branch of the infantile UN Armed Forces were horrendous, hundreds of First Gen Valkyries died in those first months too. Retaliation with the remaining intact nuclear weapons managed to break up the groups of conventional AG forces pouring fourth from the Major Breaches, at which point they stopped attacking and seemed content to buildup forces for the rest of 2057.

Types were also really rare, less than one thousand in total for the first year of the conflict were seen. They only entered 'mass production' in 2059, at which point all simulated models pointed to Gen Two Valkyries being unable to hold back the increasing number of Types and the eventual destruction of humanity. Armstrong Lunar base started building Arkships at this point.

Then in 2061, during the Battle of Britain, humanity found the Three Hundred and nearly completely wiped out Antagonist forces in Europe, culminating in the destruction of Uralsk Breach, the Eastern most AG Breach.

It was a very brief celebration as the First Type Zero, Indra, appeared after the destruction of Uralsk Breach and stalled the march westwards. Indra was initially thought to be one of a kind, so with the Three Hundred and increasing numbers of Second Gen Valks, humanity continued to push. When Abraxas cut apart Noah, Type Zeros were still just two of a kind and humanity doubled down on winning on Earth as fast as they could. When Aswang basically wiped out the Central African Arcologies in 2063, the realisation that this war would be long and bitter sank in and plans for institutionalisation of training for Valkyries formed.
As soon the Wave Force Cannon becomes feasible, I expect the Breaches to start putting out Class S Type-Zero's. And if Wave Force manipulation becomes standard for Ace's, we could very well see the rate of Type-Zero's being spawned increasing from 1 per Major Breach per year, to 2 per Major Breach per year.

So the situation could very well change from 6 Type-Zero's, ranging E-A, per year, to 14 Type-Zero's, ranging from E-S, per year.

The difference between +1 and -1, in my mind, is that they lean towards victory and defeat, respectively.
 
*Finishes wrestling formatting into submission*


*Reading reading and then*
(Avalanche, please don't add this to the threadmarks, there's just too goddamn many):

Uh, sorry. I missed this since i just pretty much opened the spoiler tag and started reading.

It is getting crowded in there, 84 threadmarks with only 14 story posts.

I think that with a story post thingo linked on the frontpage, it should be alright now I guess?
 
Uh, sorry. I missed this since i just pretty much opened the spoiler tag and started reading.

It is getting crowded in there, 84 threadmarks with only 14 story posts.

I think that with a story post thingo linked on the frontpage, it should be alright now I guess?
Perhaps make it so all the omakes are in a traditional index posted on the front page, and only use the threadmarks system for the main story posts?
 
Hmm, at 10 points per training session and the lowered target of 350, it takes 35 actions to get a Special Modifier to level 2.

Compared to the previous 1d56 with a target of 900, which would take an average of 32 actions, Anna now takes more time to gain levels in exchange for reliable growth.

Also, assuming I didn't make a mistake, it'd take 475 training sessions to max-out all of Anna's current skills, not counting the unique modifiers.

And I estimate it'd take 510 training sessions to max-out the skills listed in the Projects tab.
 
Last edited:
Glad to see this quest is still going strong. Congrats on the award Avalanche. :)
 
Perhaps make it so all the omakes are in a traditional index posted on the front page, and only use the threadmarks system for the main story posts?
That is the exact opposite of what should be done. There are 70 omakes, there are 14 story posts. The story posts should be indexed (if Avalanche chooses to do so), because indexing 70 links is just a waste of time and effort if you can do 14 instead and get the same kind of results.
 
That is the exact opposite of what should be done. There are 70 omakes, there are 14 story posts. The story posts should be indexed (if Avalanche chooses to do so), because indexing 70 links is just a waste of time and effort if you can do 14 instead and get the same kind of results.
Except that if you want to quickly get to a story post, you'd have to go to the front page.

The Threadmarks should be reserved for story posts and important announcements, not omakes.
 
Really liking the new character sheet and skill tab. A lot of nice info.

Huh Anna got a reason now to really train. Gotta master those Hypervelocity cannons, missiles and laser system... To bad that we cant train the space magic nice stuff in the simulator.

Still need to finish the list of clubs though.

And that 100% Compatibility and nearly 9 years of synchrony.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top