What serendipity! Managing to remove all the troublesome ministers so quick without committing to the front-loaded malus from Fast Course is nice. But loosing the HI Deputy sucks. Dollezhal was the director of the nuclear project and getting him kicked out of the post curtails ambitions for rolling out nuclear power. Nuclear as a whole hopefully hasn't been discredited enough to cancel Atomash, but we're gonna feel the lack of enthusiasm.In light of recent events, let us do a brief review of the past turn's anti-corruption efforts:
- Infra: Dygai removed by vote, Tarasov not yet removed but not long for this world
- LCI: both ministers nuked by the 1st set of anti-corruption rolls for egregious worker abuses
- HI: both ministers nuked by the Red Square incident (caused by the 2nd set of anti-corruption rolls) in combination with the personal assessment of HI
Now, there's a lot to discuss here, but the most important thing is that by purging three sectors in a single turn we have somehow managed to implement both the Fast Course *and* the Comprehensive Course at the same time, through the power of decisive action!
Maybe if she was in some other, more relevant to agriculture sector, that would be true. As it is, LCI mostly doesn't do anything for agricultural profitability, doubly so compared to a help with a reform from Abramov's faction. Let us not forget that it has been repeatedly stated that the actual solution to the woes of that sector is in convincing SupSov to unfuck it, and we are limited both in political capital and time to do so. Unless we start pushing for the reforms next turn, they won't have the time to propagate and really impact the sector - therefore, we need the assistance with them now, which placing a deputy minister in an unrelated sector doesn't get.I think a deputy minister who asks "what kinds of consumer goods do people want" will be good for profitability, and thus for Klimenko's rural reform push.
Best I can do is fast-food trains going to every apartment bloc in the country*.If we don't deliver a chicken in every pot then we (and any students/deputy ministers tied to us) aren't going to make it past 1969 to enjoy the fruits of seeding low level staff with supporters.
Hm? Pretty sure Moscow roads was incorporated into Moscow Renovation, no shaking and lower Progress requirements.much as the Moscow roads project got a lower Progress requirement after Voz actually had the brainwave of turning the people in charge of planning the thing upside down and shaking them until all the extra freeways they'd designed fell out of their pockets.
I could swear that project started out at 700 Progress then dropped to more like 400...Hm? Pretty sure Moscow roads was incorporated into Moscow Renovation, no shaking and lower Progress requirements.
Well, the good news (in a way) is that the 'old' sectors of conventional Soviet heavy industry, such as steel and oil production are just as corrupt, if not more so. Because that's where the real money's been for a long time. So people with new ideas aren't disproportionately likely to be blocked off from rising through the ranks compared to oldsters who started their careers in the 1930s and have taken the Kosygin years as an opportunity to let the good times roll.The new HI Minister seems just OK, and I really hope that in spite of Vozenesensky's ideals getting discredited we'll still be able to get a new HI deputy that has some sort of modernization or novel method development as their strong point. Don't want things to stagnate.
Do you think that the choice of Smolesk's minister to the detriment of cadre programs, as you seem to suggest, might lead in the medium or long term to a closure of the party and a gerontocracy like OTL ?[X]Revive Old Cadre Programs
Cadre printer go brrrrr, surely this time the students will be good little underlings and not completely obliterate our career the very first time they get to vote!.
We have a 75 age limit in politics, and the cadre programs are mostly limited to people within the ministry, so while it will help I dont think it will be transformative for the Party.Do you think that the choice of Smolesk's minister to the detriment of cadre programs, as you seem to suggest, might lead in the medium or long term to a closure of the party and a gerontocracy like OTL ?
Also, do you think that the "cardre programs" option could come back later if we choose Smolesk's minister?
I'm not entirely sure one way or another, but you might be thinking about the Western Union Passenger Rail project where, on Turn 55, Malenkov realized that they were massively overblown and by taking a middle road to the corruption and cutting out the excess lines we were able to cut a 2300 point project to 1500 points. And then later it went back up due to electrification but hey, can't win them all.I could swear that project started out at 700 Progress then dropped to more like 400...
Do you think that the choice of Smolesk's minister to the detriment of cadre programs, as you seem to suggest, might lead in the medium or long term to a closure of the party and a gerontocracy like OTL ?
Also, do you think that the "cardre programs" option could come back later if we choose Smolesk's minister?