I mean I am sure we can spin those as steps to ensure the colonization of space or something.
I am going to be the ultimate wet blanket and say that the Supreme Soviet would be right to reject a program like this. There's things that might be useful- having a relatively cost effective, man-capable carrier rocket and near-orbital capability might be useful for maintenance and deployment of satellites, but a large scale space program has very unclear benefits outside of prestige.
Infrastructure | Heavy Industry | Rocketry | LCI | Agriculture | Services | |
1950H1 | 32,50% | 48,00% | 0,00% | 12,00% | 0,00% | 7,50% |
1950H2 | 25,87% | 48,76% | 3,98% | 6,97% | 0,00% | 14,43% |
1951H1 | 22,22% | 46,46% | 5,05% | 7,07% | 6,06% | 13,13% |
1952H2 | 29,68% | 40,90% | 8,48% | 6,48% | 7,98% | 6,48% |
1952H1 | 35,29% | 39,71% | 1,96% | 14,22% | 1,96% | 6,86% |
1952H2 | 30,81% | 38,86% | 0,00% | 13,27% | 9,48% | 7,58% |
1953H1 | 32,57% | 35,99% | 2,73% | 13,67% | 7,74% | 7,29% |
1953H2 | 32,33% | 31,76% | 3,40% | 16,26% | 8,32% | 7,94% |
1954H1 | 31,84% | 30,54% | 4,84% | 16,01% | 8,94% | 7,82% |
1954H2 | 30,11% | 32,26% | 5,73% | 16,85% | 8,60% | 6,45% |
TOTAL | 30,45% | 38,56% | 3,70% | 12,69% | 6,19% | 8,41% |
I think the hardware for the high flow water pressure is at the municipal water plants not at each housing block individually. I doubt we are building our current urban areas with plumbing so weak we are looking at burst piping from a moderate pressure bump.oh the water option mentions installing high flow systems
would it be good to focus on that during renovations as well to ensure new buildings have these systems in mind?
You'll notice that I focus on things like effective carrier rockets and a potential manned capability to do science and potentially satellite-related missions. Not on spending vast fortunes on moon bases or orbital propellant depots. There's just not that many jobs to be done in space and the OTL NASA was actually able to accomplish them reasonably well despite its high costs. There's only so many pictures of the USA that will be useful, and communications and navigation will face limitations for a long time until the USSR can develop sufficiently capable computer systems to make it viable and useful(also we can just build hard lines for many applications).You think they should reject a space program that can cost effectively provide weather sats and spy sats? O.O
Well darn. OK.
I think you are extremely wrong. Being able to put capable satellites into geostationary orbit and below have a huge impact on prosperity and military power on the ground. And being able to do that for prices that mean satellites are commodity hardware, not more valuable per gram than platinum, has real benefits in terms of reducing the cost of stuff we have to do anyway and opening up options for more capable satellites than less economical space launch capacity allows. A 1 tonne geostationary satellite and a 5 tonne geostationary satellite may have a 5-fold mass difference, but they have more than just a 5-fold difference in effectiveness - economies of scale mean that bigger satellites can be FAR more capable and long-lived.
Regards,
fasquardon
100 progress: Very likely with two dice, but guaranteed with three dice. I think three dice per turn is the safe bet, I'd rather your plan have three on Moscow but I'll probably still vote for it with two.edit: Also, some info from discord:
In summary: 100 progress per turn is enough (though just barely) for Moscow, and we'll soon be getting Bureaucracy actions to gain more dice as more students graduate from our econ schools (but look out because they're lacking in experience)
It's not "moonshot victory versus build sustainable space program". It's "moonshot victory vs build foundations for sustainable space infrastructure and make the SupSov very cranky". Because if the USA just sent Apollo 8 to send a man around the moon, and we're off building space truck stops rather than hammering out an immediate response, people will notice that we're not chasing the victory and will come down on us even if we haven't actually lost yet. We just had to cancel some stuff including the pretty useful MKAS because we were forced to cut budget and had to appease Aristov by cutting things that look the least moonshot-y.Well, I'll put it like this: if we can get a sustainable space infrastructure AND be first to the moon, I am all for it.
But if it comes between choosing one or the other, I choose the sustainable space infrastructure.
Tittle erroneously refers to the 4th rather than 5th plan. Heh, The Voz calling sociology less productive makes me angry, but other than that he feels pretty impressed with our work. As he should be, I think Malenkov did a good job setting a new direction for the MNKh in the 5th plan.A Report on the Allocation of Ministry Funds During the 4th Five Year PlanChart Detailing Expenditures During the 5th Five Year Plan
Published January 2nd 1955
Did this happen in the fifth plan? I thought the end of the plan was when we got a nat 1 on oil/gas, and we only unlocked our modern has power plants with the nat 100 in H2 1956.Developments in power production have also provided a use for the plentiful gas available to us, with a pipeline in the works to distribute it and various deposits extracted in order to heat and power the Union.
Never mind. Just... never mind. I don't want to talk to you about this anymore.So what, we should crash and burn the space program trying to impress people who are wowed by stunts?
Prestige isn't nothing.I am going to be the ultimate wet blanket and say that the Supreme Soviet would be right to reject a program like this. There's things that might be useful- having a relatively cost effective, man-capable carrier rocket and near-orbital capability might be useful for maintenance and deployment of satellites, but a large scale space program has very unclear benefits outside of prestige.
I understand why you think that, but what you see in space is basically for a fair part a result of how expensive it is to get there. For instance now that getting to space dropped to half the cost of before, suddenly massive communication systems are being made. It's actually recently reached the point that some countries, having seen how effective they are, have basically declared them a strategic national interest and will make their own.You'll notice that I focus on things like effective carrier rockets and a potential manned capability to do science and potentially satellite-related missions. Not on spending vast fortunes on moon bases or orbital propellant depots. There's just not that many jobs to be done in space and the OTL NASA was actually able to accomplish them reasonably well despite its high costs. There's only so many pictures of the USA that will be useful, and communications and navigation will face limitations for a long time until the USSR can develop sufficiently capable computer systems to make it viable and useful(also we can just build hard lines for many applications).
I think getting the Euro up and running would be very good for improving trade and we really need to make sure we're well-prepared for the transition. Also, Agricultural Diversification is only using 150R this turn, I have ~200R as the point where I want a focus on a project.Not sure about the Currency Agitation @notgreat. Why not put it towards the Agricultural Diversification project with the 3 dice?
It is, I'm going to remind everyone, 1962 in the quest. You are not deploying a massive communications constellation into LEO. It is several different varieties of impossible. The USSR lacks the capability to build a sufficiently capable networking system into the satellites. Like, no equivalent exists for a ground based system, let alone somehow stuffing a mainframe-level computer into a satellite and launching it into space and having it survive any length of time, or paying for all the required computers. Even if you could, you'd need a capable transmitter/receiver on the ground, which as noted doesn't exist. And at that point, what would such a system even be for? There's no demand for data all across the union, because the systems to consume and present that data to people simply do not exist in most of the union.I understand why you think that, but what you see in space is basically for a fair part a result of how expensive it is to get there. For instance now that getting to space dropped to half the cost of before, suddenly massive communication systems are being made. It's actually recently reached the point that some countries, having seen how effective they are, have basically declared them a strategic national interest and will make their own.
So I guess we're now in a mode where mega communication constellations are now a permanent feature... because launch costs dropped and making mass produced communication sats is thus reasonable.
Well I'll admit technology plays in to this a bit as well, but never the less, there is a confluence between cost and what you do in space. And beyond communication there are yet further ideas that have been delayed over and over again due to costs. But some of those seem like they might start moving forward now as well, like space tugs and space propellant systems. Actually those two are complementary, as you can use the propellant to fill the tug, which then brings it to a sat and for instance refuels it. Which is a cost saving, and this isn't theoretical anymore, recently they've been sending up some things to extend sat life already.
Would there be a way to swap one of the LCI options over to something cheaper to afford to put Farming Supply Provisioning on Light Transportation Systems? Since even the description for Agricultural Diversification mentions that one of the biggest issues in the agri sector is a lack of refrigerated trucks, which LTS is supposed to work to solve.Light and Chemical Industry (8/8 Dice, 470 R)
-[X]Consumable Product Initiatives(Stage 1), 2 Dice (100 R)
-[X]Book Production, 1 Dice (50 R)
-[X]Electrified Appliance Production, 2 Dice (120 R)
-[X]Heat Pump Plants(Stage 1), 2 Dice (150 R)
-[X]Textile Industry Modernization(Stage 2), 1 Dice (50 R)
Agriculture (4/4 Dice, 190 R)
-[X]Farming Supply Provisioning, 1 Dice (40 R)
-[X]Agricultural Diversification, 3 Dice (150 R)
I don't see any reasonable changes to LCI. IMO the most reasonable switch to afford that would be -1 Rail, +1 Moscow, but personally I prefer my current plan.Would there be a way to swap one of the LCI options over to something cheaper to afford to put Farming Supply Provisioning on Light Transportation Systems? Since even the description for Agricultural Diversification mentions that one of the biggest issues in the agri sector is a lack of refrigerated trucks, which LTS is supposed to work to solve.
Oh I agree on the space comm for the most part, it's not happening in the 60s, it probably won't happen in the 70s as that's still to early. But I could perhaps see it in the 80s as a voice service and perhaps some data, which is already pretty useful for the military and others in a similar communication situation. So still a ways off, but close enough to show one could accelerate the progression of things a fair bit still as well.Space refueling is maybe an idea but it's a very technically thorny problem and adding fuel reserves to satellites is not that much of a penalty until you get to meaningful mass ratios.