Attempting to Fulfill the Plan MNKh Edition

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Still think we need soft sciences more than additional services.

[X]Igor Alexandrovich Skachkov
[X]Lydia Vasilievna Sokhan
 
...I know that SV is decently left-wing, but I think all the alarmism about the private sector ruining everything in this quest is a bit exaggerated.

It's not ideal, but it's not THAT much of a disaster, as long as it's properly managed.
We are playing as the USSR.the private sector is basically legalized black marketeers and thanks to godamn Stalinists every manager that lived through the Stalin era thinks that bribes and sycophants are better than actual competency or integrity.Voz is a prime example of this with his "Cadres" that are giant patronage/nepotism fests and he thinks things like actually allowing more people to vote are actually his political opponents increasing their own Cadres or fools trying to destroy the system.
 
If we could do stuff like co-ops or democratic central-planning I feel the alarmism would be a lot lesser. We just haven't been given those options yet so people are paranoid about The Managerial Class™️.
Its because Voz doesn't really care about them, its more of Kos' thing. They have apparently done pretty well, because during the whole private debt crisis, they were the least impacted by defaults and bad debt, and outperformed the rest of the private sector. It brought them into a degree of prominence that they still have. They have been screwed over by us in agriculture though, since we decided to consolidate the sector into SoE's.
 
Last edited:
Its because Voz doesn't really care about them, its more of Kos' thing. They have apparently done pretty well, because during the whole private debt crisis, they were the least impacted by defaults and bad debt, and outperformed the private sector. It brought them into a degree of prominence that they still have. They have been screwed over by us in agriculture though, since we decided to consolidate the sector into SoE's.
One day we shall dismantle their power and work towards the Classless™️ society of Communism™️ that Voz wants to strive for.
 
Feels weird without a vowel on the end. How about "standardized monetary unit of transaction" or Smut? Err, wait whops

This gets my vote.

DAMN YOU KOS I HATE YOU NOW. That's it, we're doomed. Unless we see mass popular dissent from hippie boomers or such that coerces the private sector into democratizing, I have no idea how we're ever going to build socialism when the Private Sector has been unchained. Small mercy they don't have the stock market available as a nitrous boost at least. Is the lack of that the only thing stopping the USSR from getting overrun by oligarchs at this point?

Eh, I think this is an over-reaction. Yeah, there will be enormous corruption going on in the private sector. I mean, who did people think would have the connections and respectability to get loans to start private enterprises?

But we encouraged the private sector because it could meet needs that were politically too expensive for the ministry itself to directly address. Largely this is still the case. The ministry needs to meet the expectations of the Supreme Soviet, and the Supreme Soviet (and most of the ministry) drastically under-value services.

It isn't like other parts of the TTL Soviet system don't have their own corruption issues. And to an extent a limited cross section of the party being involved in business is a good thing because it diversifies perspectives in the Party and it diversifies the kinds of corruption going on (it's easier to strike against the corrupt SOE managers if the corrupt private enterprise managers occupy space that the SOE managers would otherwise occupy and if they formed a neutral or supportive block to such reforms - though of course it is possible that a broad-tent coalition of the corrupt also formed, so this isn't guaranteed goodness).

But we don't want the corrupt private sector pseudo-capitalists growing too strong. That's one reason why Fainburg appeals to me - not that he'd lead a charge to wrest control of the service sector back to the ministry - but that he'd help us diversify the service sector and keep the pseudo-capitalists from growing too much stronger.

On one side we have people who continue the ways of the past and reuse a lot of things. Like wearing clothes and patching them when they get damaged instead of getting new ones, or reusing glass, metal, or plastic containers for storage, or holding on to newspapers as a source of emergency fuel.

Wait, Voz is against this sort of thing now?

For God's sake, the Soviets are stupid at a cartoon level, how did they last a century?

Because the opposition was of similar quality. I can tell you that in the UK and the US, this kind of stupidity happened about as often. Really it is amazing what humans can do, when you consider just how dumb we all are.

Anyway, my vote:

[X]Igor Alexandrovich Skachkov
[X]Zakhar Ilyich Fainburg

Regards,

fasquardon
 
[X]Lydia Vasilievna Sokhan

I just want more soft science education, after the medical focus that is going to happen from the current guy.
 
Last edited:
well, sure, I'm obviously generalizing.

Though to be fair generalization and stereotypes usually are based on reality.

In the end my point is mostly that Voz is doing a good job, in many ways a better job than Malenkov.

And sure, Voz isn't saving lives because he's emotionally invested in that, but presumably because he wants to raise those numbers representing "life expectancy" and "quality of life"... but I doubt most people that benefit from his policies will care about that.

Certainly better a "numbers go up" Voz than an idealist who has no idea what they're doing.

Or worse, a Stalin.
Aye. And the fact they we're running a centrally planned welfare state contributes a lot to allowing the energy of amoral Numbers Go Up-ists to be channeled to useful ends. Because we are running a government and at least some of our legitimacy comes from taking care of the people, externalities are not really a thing. Capitalists can pawn the cost of their contraptions off to the state, the people, or foreign countries. But for us? If we ever try to save money by not solving pollution or leaving some people in squalor or such, the medical bill for all the people fucked up by it ALSO lands on our desk. So better to just fix shit.

Of course the further down the command structure you go and more narrow the bureaucrats jobs get, the less this principle applies and the more rule from above they need, so it is FAR from great. The sooner that we can expand worker's councils and other bottom-up structures that can manage the managers, the better because right now our regulatory system is still quite top heavy.

Funnily, as I was participating when managers became a bloc unto themselves, I don't know the thread reasoning that lead to them being cut loose.
Yeah we straight up didn't have the technology to make central planning work. A limited and heavily regulated private sector was our 'strategic withdrawal' so to speak of take a step back and acknowledging that we simply can't fill in all the cracks ourselves and that this would keep the union afloat by actually giving people a way to sate demand for goods more nimbly than we could.
Did everybody just... not read the updates about our private sector? I thought we knew all these things years ago, the Union hasn't collapsed yet and this is the bed we made as far back as Mikoyan, much less Kosygin.
VonVonson has it right about the reason we ever introduced profitability and manager powers in the first place. With central planning a total non-option with current tech, Malenkov gave the managers a lot of autonomy so that they could do basic expansions and changes themselves instead of the central bureaucracy having to come down to handle every little upgrade and overhaul themselves. Otherwise, it's been many IRL years since we did those reforms so I don't remember the details well. I know the player base quicky grew to hate the managers, especially after the time they forced us to scupper immigration reform because the other option was to accede to their desire to treat guest workers as wage slaves.

But that's not the private sector- the Enterprises are government-owned, and at least in principle the MNKh still has power over them and (very) theoretically they are still accountable to the workers. Of course we've learnt that in practice they just behave like the capitalists if allowed and they have too much political power for my liking, but we at least have nominal authority to reign them in. With the actual private sector, IIRC for a long time capitalist companies were limited to 100 people- this being even before manager autonomy, so that we didn't need to centrally plan toothbrushes and street food. I have no idea where we set ground to remove the limit, and I don't get how Kosygin got away with that. Raising the limit would be one thing, but outright abolishing it basically lets capitalism roam the country with no restrictions aside from the lack of stock market nitrous.

Also we have the occasional worker's cooperative, IIRC those had no limit to number of people? I think there was mulling about a large credit union at one point. I really hope they're still around and haven't been squashed out by the enterprises and capitalists.

Again it's been a damn long time. Feel free to point me at the relevant turn where things happened if I have something wrong.
Do note that the Services guy will massively empower managers. All those SoE's he plans to use to dominate the tertiary sector? Run by managers. He will create a whole new class of managers, so I can legit see him becoming a potential sucessor to Voz if the latter doesn't laser him in as a threat and remove him if he eventually becomes minister, since a lot of them will owe their careers to him and form a potent cadre for him to harness in the future if he is politically competent enough. Kind of like how Voz became so influential, from his post as Minister of Heavy Industry.
I don't think the deputy can become The Voz's successor. Voz will retire before the current new Service minister does. Aside from that, the big question is what our enterprise system will look like by them. As it is right now I don't want to turn them lose, they're little better than the capitalists. But who knows, there might be some reform over the next 10 years.
 
Again it's been a damn long time. Feel free to point me at the relevant turn where things happened if I have something wrong.
From my searching I believed we removed the limit in turn 60.1 Troika.
Specifically, when we had to pass this reform:
-Changing Private Enterprise Law: The private sector has had significant issues with growth, as several businesses have struggled with the hard limit on employees. Simultaneously, enterprises have merely taken up the role of flooding markets to ensure that the private sector cannot do anything to break their comparative dominance of mass-manufactured goods. Instead of a broad reformist policy, the need to recoup currency has led to the proposal to reformat the limits on the private sector into a progressive turnover-based tax scheme, ensuring that smaller businesses can continue to grow while also minimizing the political extent of a theoretically larger enterprise. (Red Line) (Will slightly annoy Managers)

So, we didn't remove the limit, we replaced the hard limit with a soft one and was one of Kosygin's reforms we had to pass, or the troika would have blown up.

From my understanding, this works by the private enterprise having to experience ever increasing taxation if they go above a certain number of employers. This means if the commodity is in severe shortage or is highly profitable they can eat the tax but if they are not they eventually get restrained by the taxation.
 
Last edited:
Did everybody just... not read the updates about our private sector? I thought we knew all these things years ago, the Union hasn't collapsed yet and this is the bed we made as far back as Mikoyan, much less Kosygin.
This Quest is 890,000+ words long and 2.5 years old. It's difficult to keep track of all the relevant details even at the best of times.
 
I think Voz is generically against "backwardness." I doubt that someone who, say, reuses glass bottles rather than throwing them out actually bothers him, but someone who's wasting tremendous amounts of labor darning socks when it would be more efficient to just buy another pack of them might.
Funny enough, I could see Voz being in favor of Universal Basic Income as a way to combat unemployment from a lot of automation.

Sure, he'd rather the unemployed people went back to school/uni and learned to do a job that can't be automated that easily, or even went into the social sciences or humanities, but I think he'd still prefer paying UBI and doing automation then just keeping at it with inefficient work. Especially if there's incentives to use the UBI money for more education
 
From my searching I believed we removed the limit in turn 60.1 Troika.
Specifically, when we had to pass this reform:


So, we didn't remove the limit, we replaced the hard limit with a soft one and was one of Kosygin's reforms we had to pass, or the troika would have blown up.

From my understanding, this works by the private enterprise having to experience ever increasing taxation if they go above a certain number of employers. This means if the commodity is in severe shortage or is highly profitable they can eat the tax but if they are not they eventually get restrained by the taxation.
Thanks for pointing that out. I see it's not as bad as I thought, and some flexibility in the system is good I guess. Basically turns the employee hard-cap into a soft cap.
This Quest is 890,000+ words long and 2.5 years old. It's difficult to keep track of all the relevant details even at the best of times.
True. And surprising amount of the quest is far in the past because of how frighteningly quickly it updated in the early days. It started september 2020 and Stalin's 1947 death came up in March of the next year.

Funny enough, I could see Voz being in favor of Universal Basic Income as a way to combat unemployment from a lot of automation.

Sure, he'd rather the unemployed people went back to school/uni and learned to do a job that can't be automated that easily, or even went into the social sciences or humanities, but I think he'd still prefer paying UBI and doing automation then just keeping at it with inefficient work. Especially if there's incentives to use the UBI money for more education
UBI is a really hard sell for the USSR. Current ideology, while sympathetic to workers who have things go wrong, utterly detests "parasites". We don't have an unemployment stipend, we have the Labor Reserve: If you can't find a job nearby than the state keeps you alive on the understanding that, when they need someone to do grunt work in the ass-end of Siberia, you will answer.

The questions of "what do we do if/when automation causes the reserve to drain slower than it grows" is one of the great unknowns of this quest. If we're lucky we actually will be able to leverage that into UBI or at least much shorter weekly hours.
 
Back
Top