Also point for fact I would probably rephrase the above vote a bit to reflect what I mentioned... Lucan made this personal even if that wasn't his intention. Negligence is just cause for reprisal, too, considering the stakes.
That's the intent. We can understand if he didn't mean to, but that doesn't change the results. And to be fair, it was already personal before Baelor decided to try and smite us. He was clearly summoned to directly counter us, with no attempt made to actually, you know, reach out and talk.
I don't blame him for summoning some help to try to counter us, but summoning Baelor, and what it lead to, is absolutely a "party foul", so to speak. This would not be a black mark if he had summoned some other angel, who had actually listened to him, and acted against us using diplomacy.
[X] Snowfire
On another note, I didn't want to call people out in this thread as all words has been spoken these last couple of days, but this past few pages had been a huge disaster that I need this aired out.
How could you? Like really! I trusted you @Tomcost! Now you have some explaining to do!
Priorities (ie, who's the more dangerous foe to take care about first. We won't eat all human (souls).)What I want is:
- Talk to Lucan about the danger of a strong Faith
- Talk to Lucan about the Lannister enslaving their mages -> get him riled up if possible
- Get Dannelle to raise the issue of Particularism during the Conclave
???Priorities (ie, who's the more dangerous foe to take care about first. We won't eat all human (souls).)
Thread: This guy disapproves of us
Thread: HONE IN ON HIS VULNERABILITIES FOR MASSIVE PERSONAL SATISFACTION
People, what do we actually want here?
I don't see what Goldfish's vote is bringing us apart from a moment of smugness.
What I want is:
Anything else?
- Talk to Lucan about the danger of a strong Faith
- Talk to Lucan about the Lannister enslaving their mages -> get him riled up if possible
- Get Dannelle to raise the issue of Particularism during the Conclave
He was daring, yes. But that doesn't mean he's stupid.his plan was to play several demonic, devilish, or otherwise outright evil factions against each oth in a supernatural war... for the good of Westeros. If that doesn't just spell out idiotic i dont know what is. The man was clever, perhaps, but intelligent? I wouldn't say so.
Thread: This guy disapproves of us
Thread: HONE IN ON HIS VULNERABILITIES FOR MASSIVE PERSONAL SATISFACTION
People, what do we actually want here?
I don't see what Goldfish's vote is bringing us apart from a moment of smugness.
What I want is:
Anything else?
- Talk to Lucan about the danger of a strong Faith
- Talk to Lucan about the Lannister enslaving their mages -> get him riled up if possible
- Get Dannelle to raise the issue of Particularism during the Conclave
Yes I do, and I really hope that @Snowfire's vote doesn't make it impossible.If you want to talk about particularism you probably want to make time to talk to septon Donnar in some way.
I think my vote establishes the root of our grievances with Lucan, but seeks to move past that in order to establish a dialogue.Thread: This guy disapproves of us
Thread: HONE IN ON HIS VULNERABILITIES FOR MASSIVE PERSONAL SATISFACTION
People, what do we actually want here?
I don't see what Goldfish's vote is bringing us apart from a moment of smugness.
What I want is:
Anything else?
- Talk to Lucan about the danger of a strong Faith
- Talk to Lucan about the Lannister enslaving their mages -> get him riled up if possible
- Get Dannelle to raise the issue of Particularism during the Conclave
Mammon was stronger our Azata about equal and the Rakshasa are Outsiders too (though native).When you know that Lucan could summon a Planetar (the strongest outsider seem on this plane so far, except for the Sultana and she didn't stick around) this seems a little less insane.
So, go back to the days before "speechifying" was a thing?@Crake, I'm honestly not sure how your points would be addressed in practice.
Well. Except taking back a lot of characterization power to the DM to enable more nuanced presentation. Then again, Viserys did get a bit... flat over the years. And disjointed.
Maybe it's worth stepping back from direct speech votes entirely, as I personally think a bullet point as @Snowfires plzn includes to talk about Baelor is inherently easier to weave organically into the narrative.
Making @Goldfish style conditional combat trees for social votes is a bit impossible without boxing the NPC into a few stock responses. Frankly, many of our past social votes kinda power-emoted the NPC into a track...
So... vote on speech goals instead of content? Unless it's holding an actual speech with no one who could react anyway.
/rambling
Btw, if Dywen is outed as Viserys, will that burn Kyle?I'm going to have to ask how you think we can, in any scenario, continue to have access to the Conclave? As in, how you would go about keeping it. Because Dywen is done.
I'm going to have to ask how you think we can, in any scenario, continue to have access to the Conclave? As in, how you would go about keeping it. Because Dywen is done.
@DragonParadox how many captives did we take from Lucan's party? As in, how many are in our possession right now.
Magic?I'm going to have to ask how you think we can, in any scenario, continue to have access to the Conclave? As in, how you would go about keeping it. Because Dywen is done.
I disagree. I fear that Dannelle will respond and we'll get dragged into a quibble about Lucan being better than the ancient Valyrians or something.I think my vote establishes the root of our grievances with Lucan, but seeks to move past that in order to establish a dialogue.
Mammon's summoning was a special case. And IMO Lucan could summon and beat Mammon now too, if Mammon agreed to be summoned into such a stupidly dangerous setup again (against prepared enemies, alone, with little gear, etc).Mammon was stronger our Azata about equal and the Rakshasa are Outsiders too (though native).
No!