Remove ads

A Sword Without a Hilt: A Song of Ice and Fire/D&D 3.5 Crossover

Reader mode
Goldfish said:
Speaking of temples; how much did we spend on the temple for the Seven?

And should we upgrade Yss' temple?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Crake said:
About 20K I think?

And Yss is already fairly prominently sized?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
We've spent 25,000 IM on the Moonsinger Temple, and 20,000 IM on the Great Sept of Viserys.
Duesal said:
431,929 IM (Initial Liquid Assets) - 200,000 IM (payment to Iron Bank) - 25,000 IM (Moonsinger Temple) - 2,500 (Book of Tides) - 4,800 IM (Yss Temple) = 199,629 IM
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Azel said:
[X] Plan Generosity and Trolling
-[X] "Wise words. Likewise, it would be foolish of me to judge you by the actions of those preachers with less pure intentions, or to turn away a helping hand in these troubled times. Let it be known then that the Faith of the Seven now truly joins the creeds preached in my realm." // Making it clear here that the Seven are one of many.
-[X] Give him 20,000 IM in funds and the support of the Bulabar to erect a great sept between the Minotaur Village and the library. // This shunts the Sept to the outskirts of SD and into a less prestigious locale then the two Godswoods in the inner ring. Also encourages growth to the west to integrate the Minotaur Village into SD to become the Minotaur District.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Funnily enough, both of them vastly outstrip any money we've ever spent on Yss. Something I wonder if the poor snek wants an upgrade for his temple, but then I remember how fat we try to make him.
 
Duesal said:
We've spent 25,000 IM on the Moonsinger Temple, and 20,000 IM on the Great Sept of Viserys.

Funnily enough, both of them vastly outstrip any money we've ever spent on Yss. Something I wonder if the poor snek wants an upgrade for his temple, but then I remember how fat we try to make him.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

At the time, however, what we spent on Yss' temple was a significant potion of our wealth. Proportionately more than what we spent on any other temple, I believe.
 
Goldfish said:
And should we upgrade Yss' temple?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Yes.

[X] Azel

Let's not make the Burny temple a Lighthouse though, it's way to symbolic of the leading light to the capital.

One of the actual wonders of the world was a great lighthouse, it gives them far too much prominence while already a religious majority.

It also limits placement somewhat like we did with the Seven Temple.
 
Deliste said:
Yes.

[X] Azel

Let's not make the Burny temple a Lighthouse though, it's way to symbolic of the leading light to the capital.

One of the actual wonders of the world was a great lighthouse, it gives them far too much prominence while already a religious majority.

It also limits placement somewhat like we did with the Seven Temple.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I'd also like to keep the R'hllor Temple and our lighthouse separate.
 
Any ideas on how to split burny up and make him less powerful by splintering his factions later on? I mean o know we need to unite them to kill the others but come on its ducking burny. Well at least make it so we change his personality by having people edit the books and remove the slave parts.
 
Azel said:
--[X] The crown holds that a child is deserving of the aid and protection of it's parents, be it true-born or not, for the child is not responsible for how it was conceived. While the crown upholds that a bastard is by default excluded from inheritance, baring recognition by the head of house as a member of his line, both father and mother are responsible for the well-being of the life they brought into this world. Therefore, it is recognized by the crown that the child, represented by his legal guardian, is entitled to aid of absent parents, to be rendered in financial or other way. The exact nature of this support is to be agreed between the guardian and the absent parent, or to be determined by ruling of a legal court in accordance to the parents means if no agreement can be reached. In case of the parent being deceased, this obligation defaults to the head of house or the legal successor. // Translation from legalese: Child support is a thing. Be like Oberyn and render it willingly or gamble that the judge likes you
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Which is fine... Except we are the legal sucessor in this case, I believe, by virtue of confiscating everything they had and everyone from the family dying.

So, what do we give the child?
 
Reader mode
You must login or register to reply here.
Remove ads
Back
Top