I.F. Ister
Fortifying The Thread
- Pronouns
- He/They
Stuff like that would require combat dice dedicated to itI forget, can we do insults/combat poetry? Can we drain their orthstirr by pointing out they're cowardly bandits going after kids?
Stuff like that would require combat dice dedicated to itI forget, can we do insults/combat poetry? Can we drain their orthstirr by pointing out they're cowardly bandits going after kids?
midbattle nids are totally a thing, but they're mostly useful for getting the enemy to target you personally, for styling on an enemy that you utterly outclass, and for putting more soul damage into an enemy that you expect to see flee. "Attack poet with intent to kill" is pretty much a perfect defense to any nid they might have thrown, in the same way as how you can sacrifice your shield to just cancel a trick.I forget, can we do insults/combat poetry? Can we drain their orthstirr by pointing out they're cowardly bandits going after kids?
If you are going for maximum damange, what about the Leaping-Cleave? Put the Shield away and pretend to go for the grand slam. So either he tries to defend or get out of the way, Only we hit him with the Inertia-Arresting Throw first. Now we are in his space, he has no weapon and we can go ham on him.
He can take a few more swings before it's curtains. Making sure he doesn't go down and/or reviving him if he does would both count@Imperial Fister
Are the wounds bad enough that we need stabilizing palm, or would making sure he doesn't get hit again suffice to save him?
Yeah, but he does not know that. It is a bluff to get in close and start wailing at him with our ax.If anything, I think a Leaping-Cleave into a Power-Chop might be the best combo, rather than opening up with a Knee-Groin. However we can't even use Leaping-Cleave, as it's a Vague Trick. It needs to be a Rough Trick for us to be able to use it.
Yeah, but he does not know that. It is a bluff to get in close and start wailing at him with our ax.
Not sure why not, we just have to make it look like we are attacking from the air and thus an easy target for the Enforcer.I don't think we can convincingly bluff with tricks we can't use.
Even if we can this seems risky as hell since neither of the defenses you're suggesting work very well on arrows and particularly not on lots of arrows (which is, I think, the biggest danger to us right now and why giving up the shield seems like a really bad idea).
Not sure why not, we just have to make it look like we are attacking from the air and thus an easy target for the Enforcer.
Yes, it is very much an offensively focused plan, but not as risky as you think. None of the bandits know we are here, so point is to get as close to the Enforcer as possible so they cannot shoot us for risk of hitting him, effectively using him as a shield. The defense I wrote down is in case he has some martial arts training because when your body is that big, it is a weapon on its own.
Everyone in the family is worn down, so the faster we take Enforcer down, the more energy they have to spare to help each other.
As far as I'm concerned, part of the "loot" for this encounter is the chance to get another notch on nutcracker. We don't get into all that many fights where it's appropriate to use, after all. Take opportunities where you find them, you know?
And as soon as they do, they are going to get shot by the archer on the rooftop. Because you also need to remember that we are not the only ones in this fight. My plan, if it succeeds leaves us with the tank dead, Abjorn at hand with his own shield, and a fresh shield we can put back on.Right, but this fight isn't with the enforcer alone, it's with him and a total of 6 other bandits, two with bows who will almost certainly immediately prioritize shooting anyone who takes out the enforcer. They might hold out until we've done that, but only might (they may well have superhuman marksmanship by real world standards) and even then only until we succeed. Your plan, if it succeeds, leaves us standing over a dead enforcer, sure, but then getting filled full of arrows with no shield to defend us. That seems really bad.
KreenWarrior's bloodthirstier plan seems valid as a more offensive option to take the enforcer out quick, but abandoning our shield seems like a lethal disadvantage here.
And as soon as they do, they are going to get shot by the archer on the rooftop. Because you also need to remember that we are not the only ones in this fight. My plan, if it succeeds leaves us with the tank dead, Abjorn at hand with his own shield, and a fresh shield we can put back on.
I am not saying to toss the shield and never retrieve it, but to put it away while we kill him. We will still have access to it. Just like you have access to the axe. Do you have confirmation that the Stilled Movement is fire and forget or do we have to hold it? Because your plan risks giving him his weapon back before we kill him.
Not really, especially if it is an armament that you are used to carrying and using.Getting a shield off your back, or from a ways away (the only places I think we can put one) is a lot more difficult than drawing a weapon, generally speaking. And the guy we're attacking has no shield so it would be our own we need to pull out.
This on the other hand is fair. They do not even know we are here so we could potentially just toss the Inertia-Arresting Movement for free. for free.I'm just really not convinced by a plan that centers around subtly bluffing that we're going to use an attack that this guy has no reason to believe that we have, that he may not know actually exists, when he's not particularly inclined to pay a lot of direct attention to us, as a girl. It just seems like a lot of dancing about that depends on a pretty flimsy chain of logic, for an advantage that, really, isn't all that great. the fact that it's actually a gambit really doesn't help.
Not really, especially if it is an armament that you are used to carrying and using.
The weapon is still there, not destroyed. If we unfreeze it, he can just grab it and use it again even when he is not tugging on it at the moment. He just needs to see it fall and grab it.
Birds aren't great at carrying things heavier than themselves. So they cannot. Could totally glide or slow a fall, but not fly.@Imperial Fister can our owl and Aki's raven carry Aki, together? or are they not big/strong enough for that?
I mean, if an ankle is exposed, you might as well just cut it off rather than breaking it.Guys, i know you want to use the new toy, but don't forget shatter wrist. Just because it says its aimed for shields to break the wrist that holds it doesn't mean we can't use it on stuff like ankles or other body parts.