I think I was being rather polite honestly, I didn't curse or do anything but take your own post and point out the fallacies in it, and why I'm feeling so nettled by how close this vote is despite all the arguments.
You cannot honestly think that when you literally post--and I quote " The dwarves, on the other hand, might be able to do something useful with it. There are enough unknowns involved that I don't think we can be sure they won't be able to spin an advantage out of knowing, or even really know how likly they are to be able to. " That you should not be able to get upset when I go "Yes, if you look at an unknown and go 'Surely this unknown is actually hiding a great reward', that the cost looks low"
reward? where did I mention a reward? I just felt the dwarves need to know this information. We don't know the full fallout of this, but if anyone in this expedition does it would be kragg. We can't even guess how likely it is to come up, he can. As for the cost, I'm not being a naive idiot and dismissing the idea of this being a grudge, I just don't find the reasons they would flip out about the position, or march off to die in the badlands en mass very compelling. Yes, it would be a grudge, Yes if they go all-in on that specific grudge it would be blood. but well, they have giant piles of grudges in the book already, many against those who they cannot feasibly avenge. I don't see why this one would be different.
as for the idea of them freaking out about the possession, I have not seen anything I would consider a worthwhile argument in favor of that. its mostly just vague noises about dwarves issues with orks and unreliability.
reward? where did I mention a reward? I just felt the dwarves need to know this information. As for the cost, I'm not being a naive idiot and dismissing the idea of this being a grudge, I just don't find the reasons they would flip out about the position, or march off to die in the badlands en mass very compelling. Yes, it would be a grudge, Yes if they go all-in on that specific grudge it would be blood. but well, they have giant piles of grudges in the book already, many against those who they cannot feasibly avenge. I don't see why this one would be different.
as for the idea of them freaking out about the possession, I have not seen anything I would consider a worthwhile argument in favor of that. its mostly just vague noises about dwarves issues with orks and unreliability.
Gortek nearly tried to decapitate teclis when he mentioned Chaos Dwarfs. Do I think Kargg would react as violently? No he has more self control. Do I think he would react with more spite? Oh yes. Kragg the Grim is made of spite, it's why he is even still alive.
oh hey fair warning? if your argument is based 100% on OOC knowledge, I'm just going to toss it into the bin marked excessive metagaming and not engage with it.
Where in canon does your earlier posted insight into Kragg's runesmithing processes come from? Where in those 20 pages of argument were the fanon arguments in favor of staying silent that I apparently overlooked? Finally, it's telling what that I called out the use of fanon when I did?@Ganurath It's really telling that you are only bring up your principled stand for "I'm more than a little hostile toward people trying to pass off fanon and/or their personal headcanon as the actual canon of the setting" only once the other side started allegedly doing it. You were fine with folks using the same tactics for the stay silent side. It's only when the shoes are on the other foot that you had a problem with it. Seen directly by you not calling it out during the 20 pages of discussion before a solid counter argument was made.
I mean if someone told me they were literally possessed by Satan himself I would instantly begin questioning quite strongly the integrity of the person. Normal balanced people don't go around claiming to have been possessed by Satan. It doesn't really matter to me who or what they have done before. Such outrageous claims instantly change a relationship. While the analogy is not 1 to 1 Mork has been the enemy of dwarfs for as long as greenskins have been alive. Claiming to have been possessed by Mork will instantly change the relationship between Mathilde and Belebro.
Whether other people consider the Dwarves behaviour reasonable is irrelevant. What matters is whether it hurts them more than it helps and whether there would be any significant positive difference if the Dwarves psychology which enables and creates the Grudge phenomena were gone.Oh, they don't murder entire species do they? I'm sure that's a great comfort to the widows and orphans left behind by the conscripts killed because the dwarfs could not get their two pennies from their overlord. My point is that what they consider fair restitution many others might consider insane thus impeding cooperation and compromise. The dwarfs will for instance never get what they consider fair restitution for the War of Vengeance (see Kragg's inner thoughts counting elves alongside goblins and skaven as racial enemies) thus the waystone network can never be fixed by combined dwarf/elf efforts and though its erosion the world dies a little more each day.
Whether other people consider the Dwarves behaviour reasonable is irrelevant. What matters is whether it hurts them more than it helps and whether there would be any significant positive difference if the Dwarves psychology which enables and creates the Grudge phenomena were gone.
I don't believe so. The true problem is not their grudges, not their difficulty in working with others or even their low birth rates
Dwarves live in a world where it doesn't matter whether you can forgive and forget, where compassion and cooperation aren't enough. Because you are outnumbered and outgunned on every front.
So it is for the humans, who have no book of grudges, so it is for the elves, who have no book of grudges, and so it is for the Dwarves, who happen to have a book of grudges and die just the same as everyone else.
My argument is right there.You are not actually giving an argument here, just stating what you believe so there's nothing for me to say but 'let's agree to disagree'.
We didn't get "caught up" as you say. We were the instrument of Mork exacting his divine justice. That is a little bit more than "caught up" in a ritual. That is a big deal. To be a hand of Mork is to act with the intentions of Mork. Mork does not have good intentions when it comes to the dwarfs. You say this is a setting with gods and magic and demons. How many times do people get possessed by those divine? People normally don't go around claiming to have been possessed. It just doesn't happen. Either it's true and we were a conduit for Mork or we are crazy. And if it is true that we were a conduit for Mork why couldn't Mork make us a conduit again? These are questions that completely change a relationship.Personally, I doubt it. This is a setting where gods and magic and demons happen. I don't think getting caught up in essentially the splash of a massive divine ritual, especially from a god known not to do corruption, would be seen as some big dark secret. No more than spending a few minutes going mad under a bray shamans curse would.
My argument is right there.
It is: Whether the Dwarves have a book of Grudges or not is not an essential cause of their downfall. This is shown as other species, which do not have a book of grudges, experience a similar phenomenon. It is also shown as there was a time when the Dwarves Maintained their book of Grudges and were not a failing species pushed to the brink.
The existence of the book of grudges does not correlate to their downfall.
So the dwarves continuing their progress down the technological paths, working to re-conquer their homes, assisting their allies (humans) in building up and more doesn't count. But the modest gains on the elves part are enough to qualify?That is manifestly not true, humanity is doing much better than it did say two thousand years ago, it's progressing not declining, even the high elves who have to contend with similar low birth rates have modest gains under the current king
I'm not going to qoute the update, because that would ping the QM into this, but here, this is from Karak Eight Peaks: The Battle of Karag Nar, Part 4:Where in canon does your earlier posted insight into Kragg's runesmithing processes come from? Where in those 20 pages of argument were the fanon arguments in favor of staying silent that I apparently overlooked? Finally, it's telling what that I called out the use of fanon when I did?
We didn't get "caught up" as you say. We were the instrument of Mork exacting his divine justice. That is a little bit more than "caught up" in a ritual. That is a big deal. To be a hand of Mork is to act with the intentions of Mork. Mork does not have good intentions when it comes to the dwarfs. You say this is a setting with gods and magic and demons. How many times do people get possessed by those divine? People normally don't go around claiming to have been possessed. It just doesn't happen. Either it's true and we were a conduit for Mork or we are crazy. And if it is true that we were a conduit for Mork why couldn't Mork make us a conduit again? These are questions that completely change a relationship.
We didn't get "caught up" as you say. We were the instrument of Mork exacting his divine justice. That is a little bit more than "caught up" in a ritual. That is a big deal. To be a hand of Mork is to act with the intentions of Mork. Mork does not have good intentions when it comes to the dwarfs. You say this is a setting with gods and magic and demons. How many times do people get possessed by those divine? People normally don't go around claiming to have been possessed. It just doesn't happen. Either it's true and we were a conduit for Mork or we are crazy. And if it is true that we were a conduit for Mork why couldn't Mork make us a conduit again? These are questions that completely change a relationship.
So the dwarves continuing their progress down the technological paths, working to re-conquer their homes, assisting their allies (humans) in building up and more doesn't count. But the modest gains on the elves part are enough to qualify?
Edit: for clarity
I was unclear when naming the Dwarves allies, yeah.No, not really because the dwarfs are still looking down the barrel of a mountain of unsolvable grudges. Also it bears noting that dwarfs are not allied with humans, they are allied with the Empire of Sigmar. Most humans don't like them. Arguing that dwarfs are allies of humans is like saying the same of the Asrai since they have Bretonia.