I say that this protectorate have a monarch sort of like a puppet they sometimes do that in Real life
It's never been denied that a larger Protectorate would be more difficult and require more micromanagement over a longer period of time but the general consensus is that it would be worth it and that it is genuinely good for the people of Maretonia... Ok, I will admit that in my reading I have not technically yet reached this point of the quest, even if I read the latest updates, but...
Are you sure you aren't overestimating how much high the chance to get the entire country as a protectorate is?
What was said by the QM, from my perspective, seemed to imply more of a long term effort, and a costly one at that, both in resources and number of actions, which is problematic due to how random events are a constant in the quest.
And that may simply not be worth it at the end of the day.
In contrast, the intrigue action to basically get the abolitionist as a protectorate would probably only take a few turns to achieve a smaller goal, but one that would be a lot less problematic to handle.
And I think that's something that should not be mostly ignored like it seems to me right now.
It's never been denied that a larger Protectorate would be more difficult and require more micromanagement over a longer period of time but the general consensus is that it would be worth it and that it is genuinely good for the people of Maretonia
I mean it is based on something, primarily the fact that control over all of Maretonia would mean more land, more resources, a larger workforce and access to even more varied forms of magicThing is, this general consensus is based on nothing, so it may be completely wrong.
I disagree, there are definitely notable differences between the two situations but they do share enough similarities to give us a decent idea of how things will go, most noticeably that they're both countries that have been left completely ravaged with no government or economy that owe the end of their suffering to the Empire and would significantly struggle to rebuild without our helpWe just do not have a reference from which draw some parallelisms (the crystal kingdom was in a too specific situation to be usable as one).
Except we're one of the largest economies on the planet, which means we will almost certainly have the necessary resources to spare, and we have proven to be very good at winning hearts and minds, especially when most of the largest group in the country already likes usThis is mostly like trying a shot in the dark twice: once to see if you have the resources and actions to spare at the right time, and the other to see if that will be enough to win the hearth of the ponies, which I think it is probably not a guarantee.
No, our deal with them was that they'd work with/for us and in exchange we wouldn't compromise their autonomy nor would we annex Maretonia, which is different from being a protectorateDidn't we also promise the Maretonia mages we wouldn't take any land as well?
That was mainly for the upcoming war for the yetis and just in case for the dragons. I don't think their going to be sitting on their mountain pickin their noses forever.After double checking all the actions I think I'll have to pick this one as my preferred choice, even if I'd rather it had found a way to replace something with Crystal Forests. Other than that I definitely like the more economic/diplomatic focus it has. I was mildly concerned about going into flying fortresses so soon after intervening into the civil war.
Didn't we also promise the Maretonia mages we wouldn't take any land as well?
I'd say it's not exactly fair to say that we've been ignoring Gilda since this is only the second turn that that option has been a thing and on turn 29 we took the action to find her a hobbyThe only thing I am dissappointed on the leading votes are that of non Gilda votes. We have been neglecting her lately and with her becoming 18 years old that Tournament would be perfect of her coming of age.