empire-carrying species we might encounter:
What about Minotaurs, human like birds from the movie, Dragons, and whatever species the Storm King and his soldiers are?
Don't forget the bipedal cat people.
Sphinxes (but with cat faces) should be a thing.
We just got hypogryphs, but there were those ones that became hippocampi from the movie.
Yetis are possible.
Generally any animal or mythological creature really.
Is this planet a lot bigger than Earth perhaps?
 
At this point I would be very dissapointed if Hardbeak didnt end up as one of ghe Heroes who sealed away the Pony of Shadows alongside starswirl and the rest.


Seriously, he would perfectly represent Duty or maybe Honor or Valor.

Duty could be refined into Conviction or Determination.

Honor could be refined into Justice or Fairness.

Valor could be refined into Heroism or Leadership.


After all, I hope to have a sequel to this quest when it is oved and I would LOVE if we had a few additions to the Tree of Harmony from our own heroes.
This is prime Omake fuel right here. That way, we can let the QM decide if it affects the campaign.

In this version he killed them all off.

Which honestly kind if screwed him out of any redemption by breaking the curse on his species.
I mean, the comics have always had a questionable relationship with canon and the show killed him off as well.
 
I mean, the comics have always had a questionable relationship with canon and the show killed him off as well
I mean he went out, found the prison outside of time, and killed every last member of his race within.

thought he enslaved them here while he killed them in the comics?


In canon sombra had no idea where the prison was so he couldnt have killed them all even if he wanted to. Also he flat out didnt care about them.


I think you are getting confused.


I was talking about the Shadow Ponies. The race of cursed ponies who are implied to have been researching dark magic.
 
we're barely done with exploring our own continent and closest islands.

Most of these races are probably on other continents.

The Zebras will probably be THE power of not-Africa. Qilin are not-Japan. We are more or less Not-Western-Europe, and Equestria will probably be Not-North America.

I thought he enslaved them here while he killed them in the comics?
he enslaved the crystal ponies here, but do you remember his shadow monsters? the main ingredient was umbrum (basically shadow ponies)

he asked them to submit to him. They refused. He killed them and used their corpses to make his shadow monsters

To be clear, umbrum/shadow ponies are only a thing in the comics, not the cartoon. In the cartoon Sombra is just a unicorn
 
In canon sombra had no idea where the prison was so he couldnt have killed them all even if he wanted to. Also he flat out didnt care about them.


I think you are getting confused.


I was talking about the Shadow Ponies. The race of cursed ponies who are implied to have been researching dark magic.

he enslaved the crystal ponies here, but do you remember his shadow monsters? the main ingredient was umbrum (basically shadow ponies)

he asked them to submit to him. They refused. He killed them and used their corpses to make his shadow monsters

To be clear, umbrum/shadow ponies are only a thing in the comics, not the cartoon. In the cartoon Sombra is just a unicorn
Well it's been awhile since I read about the war with Sombra so I probably did forget a few information, my bad guys.:oops:

Yeah, Griffonia. Those were griffons.
Really cause Captain Celaeno and her crew don't look like Griffons to me?:???:
 
we're barely done with exploring our own continent and closest islands.

Most of these races are probably on other continents.

The Zebras will probably be THE power of not-Africa. Qilin are not-Japan. We are more or less Not-Western-Europe, and Equestria will probably be Not-North America.
Expect for the fact that we're neighbors to the Crystal Empire and the Yak, who are canonically also neighbors to Equestria.
 
Expect for the fact that we're neighbors to the Crystal Empire and the Yak, who are canonically also neighbors to Equestria.
Discord laughs in the face of your map!

after his age of chaos ended, every land found itself somewhere different from where it used to be.

canon map is not applicable to this quest, Questor rolled for the position of most races/kingdoms
Really cause Captain Celaeno and her crew don't look like Griffons to me?:???:
Wasn't she basically a parrot?
 
here are all the maps so far


the more important are these ones:


Gryphus and YakYakistan


Emerald Isles and the Caribous' lands relative to Neighpon


Crystal protectorate, Canterbury and a piece of Maretonia. Also Libertalia and a Piece of Neighpon.


Neighpon relative to Gryphus


Again Crystal Protectorate, Maretonia and Libertalia.


legacy map of what the gryphon kingdoms used to be like. Not sure were the feathersian cities are though.

@Questor could you maybe release a map with all the known lands? At this point the only ones we still don't know from our continent are those to the west of YakYakistan (and Canterbury) And south of Maretonia
 
Yes, but they will not always be a "MUST SOLVE ASAP" type deal.


The population boom is going to be a multiturn issue that needs at least ine full round dedicated to blunting the worst of the effects.

This is that round and, should everything go well, we should have a free space for it next turn.
True, but sometimes those bigger issues can be ignored for a bit without everything blowing up on us and sometimes not.
That's the point of what I was saying. "We have issues to solve!" is never a good excuse for ignoring the smaller, less-crucial actions because we always have at least a little room that we can make for taking on those other issues.
 
That's the point of what I was saying. "We have issues to solve!" is never a good excuse for ignoring the smaller, less-crucial actions because we always have at least a little room that we can make for taking on those other issues.
..... You seem to misunderstand what we are saying.


We are saying there are issues that need immediate action to deal with (like the incoming population boom) and there are issues we can take our time on.

Currently we need a turn dedicated to blunting the impact of the crisis. This is that turn and AFTER that turn, so long as it goes well, we should have the chance to make the air ship.
 
So, anyone want to toss in an omake? If not, I'm perfectly willing to put in one of mine. Would like to save mine for later, but I do have like, 4 I can use.
 
..... You seem to misunderstand what we are saying.


We are saying there are issues that need immediate action to deal with (like the incoming population boom) and there are issues we can take our time on.

Currently we need a turn dedicated to blunting the impact of the crisis. This is that turn and AFTER that turn, so long as it goes well, we should have the chance to make the air ship.
Incorrect, YOU were saying that. The other user was saying something different than you, so there is no "we" in this situation. I bundled you two together for ease of talking about the same issue.

Anyhow, my point was in reference to the conversation over what we have missed in the past, not what is going on now. There is and always will be a crisis or potential crisis brewing, because that's just the natural state of leading a country. My point is that we have multiple actions and have in the past been able to accomplish non-issue actions in spite of ALSO fixing the current crisis at hand, therefore "we have a crisis" is a nonapplicable excuse. The true answer is merely that more people prioritize specific non-crisis actions over other non-crisis actions, and therefore it would be more honest to not pretend that "we'll get to it eventually" is a valid answer when it more often than not isn't. People who prioritize specific actions low enough now that they don't spend the extra actions on them aren't likely to suddenly reprioritize higher them later.
 
Incorrect, YOU were saying that. The other user was saying something different than you, so there is no "we" in this situation. I bundled you two together for ease of talking about the same issue.

Anyhow, my point was in reference to the conversation over what we have missed in the past, not what is going on now. There is and always will be a crisis or potential crisis brewing, because that's just the natural state of leading a country. My point is that we have multiple actions and have in the past been able to accomplish non-issue actions in spite of ALSO fixing the current crisis at hand, therefore "we have a crisis" is a nonapplicable excuse. The true answer is merely that more people prioritize specific non-crisis actions over other non-crisis actions, and therefore it would be more honest to not pretend that "we'll get to it eventually" is a valid answer when it more often than not isn't. People who prioritize specific actions low enough now that they don't spend the extra actions on them aren't likely to suddenly reprioritize higher them later.
Sorry if I'm misinterpreting this, but did you just admit that you're upset at people for having different opinions than you?
 
Sorry if I'm misinterpreting this, but did you just admit that you're upset at people for having different opinions than you?
No? I haven't been around long enough in this quest for that to have come up yet. I am just saying the truth is that people DO have different opinions and that most options in most quests in this format don't actually get implemented when they're put into the "we'll get to that eventually" category meant to placate others whom do wish for options to be chosen. I more dislike that excuse simply BECAUSE it's likely not happening and seems more to be an empty platitude rather than simply being straightforward and honest about the facts of the situation.
 
No? I haven't been around long enough in this quest for that to have come up yet. I am just saying the truth is that people DO have different opinions and that most options in most quests in this format don't actually get implemented when they're put into the "we'll get to that eventually" category meant to placate others whom do wish for options to be chosen. I more dislike that excuse simply BECAUSE it's likely not happening and seems more to be an empty platitude rather than simply being straightforward and honest about the facts of the situation.
I dont see the issue, really. We have said that before, and we have gotten around to doing X thing. Big ones being lumberjack and without wings.

Like, it doesnt seem like this discussion is amounting to much...? I cant really see an end goal to it.
 
I dont see the issue, really. We have said that before, and we have gotten around to doing X thing. Big ones being lumberjack and without wings.

Like, it doesnt seem like this discussion is amounting to much...? I cant really see an end goal to it.
That's because it wasn't meant to be a big issue to discuss. I just popped in to say my two cents and locking turned it into a conversation, followed by b-wolf taking my objective observation to be a personal issue.
 
Last edited:
That's because it wasn't meant to be a big issue to discuss. I just popped in to say my two cents and locking turned it into a conversation, followed by b-wolf taking my objective observation to be a personal issue.
Dude, I never turned it into anything. All I did was reply to what you posted. Kind of confused why that is an issue, much less how it is on me that it kept going but this is getting off topic.
 
Back
Top