At the very least she's not stupid. We can't really know if she's good, evil, pro-slavery or against, or anything else about her. But she seems relatively smart, and she obviously cares about keeping her crown.

All of this makes her AT THE VERY LEAST better than both Brochard and Sombra.
Yep. My read on her is that she's way more competent than Brochard or Sombra, but she's also in a much harder position. She has to deal with the nobles actually having opinions and desires, while Sombra had exactly zero supporters of any sort (mind control for the win!) and Brochard managed to just bully his nobles into doing anything he wanted. Furthermore, because of said uppity nobles, Maretonia is surrounded by powerful nations that are hate them. Sombra and Brochard were both one of two known superpowers during their conflicts, with most factions other than Gryphus contributing a relatively small amount to the war. Maretonia on the other hand would face 3 nations that all are capable of putting up a good fight and probably win, if they ever decided to go to war.
 
Maretonia on the other hand would face 3 nations that all are capable of putting up a good fight and probably win, if they ever decided to go to war.
It'd be bloody and expensive if it comes to that. Ideally we want the only war Maretonia's involved in for the foreseeable future to be a civil one, possibly between the Abolitionists and the Slavers, but more likely between the Centralizing Queen and the Angry Nobles. Once such a war happens, regardless of who wins, we'll be in a position to dictate terms.

If we have to invade then it's going to be horrible. This won't be like the unification of the Empire, where at the end of the day everyone was pretty happy that someone had won. This won't be like the war against Sombra, where once the evil sorcerer was dead the survivors were elated and entirely happy to join us in whatever way we wanted. This will require a military occupation and pacification.

If we invade then whatever puppet monarch we put on the throne will require our assistance for a long time. We can't just go in, smash the existing power structure, and get out - that's a recipe for turning the place into a hotbed for terrorists. At best, a similar power structure to the one we destroyed will emerge like with the lacklustre Reconstruction in the USA post-CW.

So, yeah. If at all possible, now that we've got our citizens back, let's avoid an invasion. I mean don't get me wrong, if that's the only way to eradicate slavery then that's what we'll have to do, damn the consequences, but I think our intrigue options are a better bet.
 
It'd be bloody and expensive if it comes to that. Ideally we want the only war Maretonia's involved in for the foreseeable future to be a civil one, possibly between the Abolitionists and the Slavers, but more likely between the Centralizing Queen and the Angry Nobles. Once such a war happens, regardless of who wins, we'll be in a position to dictate terms.

If we have to invade then it's going to be horrible. This won't be like the unification of the Empire, where at the end of the day everyone was pretty happy that someone had won. This won't be like the war against Sombra, where once the evil sorcerer was dead the survivors were elated and entirely happy to join us in whatever way we wanted. This will require a military occupation and pacification.

If we invade then whatever puppet monarch we put on the throne will require our assistance for a long time. We can't just go in, smash the existing power structure, and get out - that's a recipe for turning the place into a hotbed for terrorists. At best, a similar power structure to the one we destroyed will emerge like with the lacklustre Reconstruction in the USA post-CW.

So, yeah. If at all possible, now that we've got our citizens back, let's avoid an invasion. I mean don't get me wrong, if that's the only way to eradicate slavery then that's what we'll have to do, damn the consequences, but I think our intrigue options are a better bet.
True, and I absolutely agree with going Intrigue over Martial. Tricking them into a civil war with the crown vs the nobles sounds like a very good idea, although it would be bloody enough that it's probably best to try to try to sway things without it first.

As an aside, I think we could do at least a little bit better than post-CW America. America at the time had the misfortune of having a pro-south president after Lincoln got assassinated, which mucked up reconstruction by a lot. I don't think that anyone who would be in power after we defeated Maretonia would have any problems with slavery being destroyed. I think we'd have much bigger problems with terrorists. Which would still be an issue, but it wouldn't end with people openly displaying Maretonian flags decades after their defeat.

Edit:
*Note*
I am definitely not advocating for an invasion. Terrorists are not something we want to deal with, nor is fighting their army to begin with.
 
Last edited:
So, yeah. If at all possible, now that we've got our citizens back, let's avoid an invasion. I mean don't get me wrong, if that's the only way to eradicate slavery then that's what we'll have to do, damn the consequences, but I think our intrigue options are a better bet.

Depends, even if we spark civil war there is chance of pro slavers wining. On our part if we intervene our nobility will probably ask for territoral concessions (they asked in face of Sombra ), if we draw our allies they will do so to, which will basically left sour taste in Maretonian population who won't view us as friends and will be potential enemies down the line.

Basically our best bet would be if we give abolitionists legitimacy, basically have crown side with them and abolish slavery.
 
Last edited:
Depends, even if we spark civil war there is chance of pro slavers wining.
Regardless of who wins the civil war the country will be in no position to fight us. If the war ends and we send them an ultimatum of "abandon slavery right smegging now or we will invade and force you to abandon it anyway" they'll either do what we want or we'll have an easier time invading them than we currently have. I highly doubt that the slaver nobles care about slavery more than keeping their heads attached to their necks.

But yeah, ideally the result of the civil war would be "Nice country you have there. Be a shame if an anti-slavery crusade were to happen to it. Want a hand propping up your new doubtlessly anti-slavery government? Hint, hint."
 
Regardless of who wins the civil war the country will be in no position to fight us. If the war ends and we send them an ultimatum of "abandon slavery right smegging now or we will invade and force you to abandon it anyway" they'll either do what we want or we'll have an easier time invading them than we currently have. I highly doubt that the slaver nobles care about slavery more than keeping their heads attached to their necks.

But yeah, ideally the result of the civil war would be "Nice country you have there. Be a shame if an anti-slavery crusade were to happen to it. Want a hand propping up your new doubtlessly anti-slavery government? Hint, hint."
I feel like we could probably try some non-violent protests first. Get enough people in the streets in protest, grind their economy to a halt, force the nobility to sign off on a document that would finally ban slavery and make labor unions to protect workers, as well as make some laws to protect from making the equivalent of slavery somewhere down the line... it would take a lot longer, but it would also probably wind up being the most stable option, since theres outside pressure from us and our allies to consider, so it's not like theres no backing at all to it, and itd be an internal change, rather than a force from outside. Also, less bloodshed. They are still living beings after all. Not forces of evil like sombra was where the only choice was war or death. People can have their opinions swayed.
 
Personally, my preferred option for how Maretonia would play out is civil war followed by international invasion. Ideally the civil war will be wide spread enough that the winner lacks the strength to fight back whoever is it. Then given the widespread chaos caused, possibly with some actions as well added to help, we and the rest of our allies enter the country with popular support as the people who are ending the chaos and restoring order.

Maybe we all take some strategic territory that we want and leave a free state that is too weak to be a threat or maybe we just partition the country in its entirety. Obviously there is no point determining which until we reach that point since you never count your chickens before they hatch but that is the general idea.

Overall I see the Maretonia end game from intrigue as:
1. End of slavery in Maretonia.
2. End of Maretonia as a military threat.
3. Expansion of territory if possible.
4. Avoidance of a costly war and occupation.
 
I feel like we could probably try some non-violent protests first. Get enough people in the streets in protest, grind their economy to a halt, force the nobility to sign off on a document that would finally ban slavery and make labor unions to protect workers, as well as make some laws to protect from making the equivalent of slavery somewhere down the line... it would take a lot longer, but it would also probably wind up being the most stable option, since theres outside pressure from us and our allies to consider, so it's not like theres no backing at all to it, and itd be an internal change, rather than a force from outside. Also, less bloodshed. They are still living beings after all. Not forces of evil like sombra was where the only choice was war or death. People can have their opinions swayed.

i don't think non-violent protests would work in this situation. Not right now at least.

for them to work it's necessary for people to somewhat care, and they need to be unwilling to escalate to violence.

Most slave-owners (there will certainly be at least some who actually care about their slaves), ESPECIALLY the nobles who own A LOT of them for heavy work (mining, agriculture) won't care enough to avoid escalating. After all property doesn't have a right to complain.

the abolitionists are still a minority, and most sympathizers won't want to risk being imprisoned and possibly enslaved as well.

Actually, with most abolitionists being unidentified by the authorities non violent protests would simply give them a way to identify potentially dangerous elements, to use as scapegoats or example. Worst case, they might simply capture and enslave her for "attempting to subvert the social order" or something like it.

Right now our best course of action is covert support of the abolitionist factions, and maybe some diplomatic/economic pressure if we can (offer to trade/access to some of our tech if/when they remove their "uncivilized custom", access to foreign markets, exchanges of knowledge..)and decide we can trust them to keep their word (or we have enough abolitionists in high positions to KNOW they'll keep their word, and that those who try not to will be punished).

If it ever comes to open civil war THEN we'll decide if we want to keep ourselves to covert support, or if it would be worth it to proclaim open support for our favorite faction and possibly offer military support/invade


Maybe we all take some strategic territory that we want and leave a free state that is too weak to be a threat or maybe we just partition the country in its entirety. Obviously there is no point determining which until we reach that point since you never count your chickens before they hatch but that is the general idea.

I think it's unlikely we'll manage to actually conquer the entire country.

Or, to be more precise, we COULD, but we'd probably have quite a lot of trouble actually managing it unless we really play it perfectly. A conquered people can make our life hell, and if we want to mantain our "moral high ground" we can't really resort to the methods dictatorships use to mantain control.

We can't even be certain we'd have the support of the abolitionists. They want to remove slavery from their country, but we have no idea how they would feel about having a foreign overlord, even a benevolent one. They might even support us for a bit, but once slavery has been banned some of them might form some other clandestine group who's aim is "freedom from the conqueror!"

tl;dr: if we conquer Maretonia and don't have enough popular support from the conquered, we risk terrorists.

Even worse, magical capable terrorists with access to much of our tech!
 
i don't think non-violent protests would work in this situation. Not right now at least.

for them to work it's necessary for people to somewhat care, and they need to be unwilling to escalate to violence.

Most slave-owners (there will certainly be at least some who actually care about their slaves), ESPECIALLY the nobles who own A LOT of them for heavy work (mining, agriculture) won't care enough to avoid escalating. After all property doesn't have a right to complain.

the abolitionists are still a minority, and most sympathizers won't want to risk being imprisoned and possibly enslaved as well.

Actually, with most abolitionists being unidentified by the authorities non violent protests would simply give them a way to identify potentially dangerous elements, to use as scapegoats or example. Worst case, they might simply capture and enslave her for "attempting to subvert the social order" or something like it.

Right now our best course of action is covert support of the abolitionist factions, and maybe some diplomatic/economic pressure if we can (offer to trade/access to some of our tech if/when they remove their "uncivilized custom", access to foreign markets, exchanges of knowledge..)and decide we can trust them to keep their word (or we have enough abolitionists in high positions to KNOW they'll keep their word, and that those who try not to will be punished).

If it ever comes to open civil war THEN we'll decide if we want to keep ourselves to covert support, or if it would be worth it to proclaim open support for our favorite faction and possibly offer military support/invade




I think it's unlikely we'll manage to actually conquer the entire country.

Or, to be more precise, we COULD, but we'd probably have quite a lot of trouble actually managing it unless we really play it perfectly. A conquered people can make our life hell, and if we want to mantain our "moral high ground" we can't really resort to the methods dictatorships use to mantain control.

We can't even be certain we'd have the support of the abolitionists. They want to remove slavery from their country, but we have no idea how they would feel about having a foreign overlord, even a benevolent one. They might even support us for a bit, but once slavery has been banned some of them might form some other clandestine group who's aim is "freedom from the conqueror!"

tl;dr: if we conquer Maretonia and don't have enough popular support from the conquered, we risk terrorists.

Even worse, magical capable terrorists with access to much of our tech!
For non-violent protests, Id just placed that sort of thing after getting some more open support in the upper echelons of the nobility. Like, at least have it be more an even split between pro- and anti-slavery.

If a lot of the slaves of the major slave holders simply stop working, I'd think thatd be sufficient pressure, but they may also call in military forces/raise retinue to deal with it. Still dont want it to escalate to violence tho. Sure, it would probably turn out better for us if they imploded cause yay land to gobble and the problem may just die, but, as stated, really dont actually want a civil war. Good people on both sides would die. Even if some of those good people are severely misguided.
 
i don't think non-violent protests would work in this situation. Not right now at least.

for them to work it's necessary for people to somewhat care, and they need to be unwilling to escalate to violence.

Most slave-owners (there will certainly be at least some who actually care about their slaves), ESPECIALLY the nobles who own A LOT of them for heavy work (mining, agriculture) won't care enough to avoid escalating. After all property doesn't have a right to complain.

the abolitionists are still a minority, and most sympathizers won't want to risk being imprisoned and possibly enslaved as well.

Actually, with most abolitionists being unidentified by the authorities non violent protests would simply give them a way to identify potentially dangerous elements, to use as scapegoats or example. Worst case, they might simply capture and enslave her for "attempting to subvert the social order" or something like it.

Right now our best course of action is covert support of the abolitionist factions, and maybe some diplomatic/economic pressure if we can (offer to trade/access to some of our tech if/when they remove their "uncivilized custom", access to foreign markets, exchanges of knowledge..)and decide we can trust them to keep their word (or we have enough abolitionists in high positions to KNOW they'll keep their word, and that those who try not to will be punished).

If it ever comes to open civil war THEN we'll decide if we want to keep ourselves to covert support, or if it would be worth it to proclaim open support for our favorite faction and possibly offer military support/invade




I think it's unlikely we'll manage to actually conquer the entire country.

Or, to be more precise, we COULD, but we'd probably have quite a lot of trouble actually managing it unless we really play it perfectly. A conquered people can make our life hell, and if we want to mantain our "moral high ground" we can't really resort to the methods dictatorships use to mantain control.

We can't even be certain we'd have the support of the abolitionists. They want to remove slavery from their country, but we have no idea how they would feel about having a foreign overlord, even a benevolent one. They might even support us for a bit, but once slavery has been banned some of them might form some other clandestine group who's aim is "freedom from the conqueror!"

tl;dr: if we conquer Maretonia and don't have enough popular support from the conquered, we risk terrorists.

Even worse, magical capable terrorists with access to much of our tech!
Not to misrepresent your point but you mentioned 'entire country' I specifically mentioned only taking some strategic territory not all of it.

Moreover, I think people are really overstating the possibility of 'terrorists' which is more modern then what we would get. This is not the modern world which is defined by nationalism it is a largely medieval one where the boundaries are determined by the monarchs possessions and national identity is much more fluid. There is absolutely a risk of internal resistance but that mainly comes from the nobility being threatened by their loss of privilege and way of life to a new more powerful ruler. Basically in Maretonia's case if we invade under the circumstances discussed the common people will largely accept us as long as we treat them the same of better to previous rulership but the Pegasus unicorn nobility will through a fit that will be trouble some unless they are too weakened to fight back. For an example see how we were able to make imperials out of the crystal empire with little resistance since there nobility was gutted despite the difference in species.
 
Not to misrepresent your point but you mentioned 'entire country' I specifically mentioned only taking some strategic territory not all of it.
that's fair, though you actually mentioned BOTH the chance to get some territory, or to actually partition the country.

Magic items trading deals and magical knowledge might actually be of more worth to us than more territory though. It would depend.
Moreover, I think people are really overstating the possibility of 'terrorists' which is more modern then what we would get. This is not the modern world which is defined by nationalism it is a largely medieval one where the boundaries are determined by the monarchs possessions and national identity is much more fluid. There is absolutely a risk of internal resistance but that mainly comes from the nobility being threatened by their loss of privilege and way of life to a new more powerful ruler. Basically in Maretonia's case if we invade under the circumstances discussed the common people will largely accept us as long as we treat them the same of better to previous rulership but the Pegasus unicorn nobility will through a fit that will be trouble some unless they are too weakened to fight back. For an example see how we were able to make imperials out of the crystal empire with little resistance since there nobility was gutted despite the difference in species.
You're right, i'm probably overstating the chance of "terrorists". There's also the fact that it's very likely this kingdom is actually very young.

I doubt Maretonia could have prospered while Discord was around.

Of course we could probably win a LOT of support by simply being a good ruler and introducing some of our tech.

Still, while having the support of "the common people" is good and usefull, that by itself won't be enough. We'll need the support of the merchants (doable, giving them access to many new goods and foreign markets will certainly help) and at least part of the nobility.

The last part will be the hardest. We could reasonably find some pegasi simpathizers (we do share a somewhat similar military culture/past), but the unicorn nobility will be the hardest to get on our side. Killing them all has its possible consequences, as does leaving them alive. I doubt we can get more than a small minority on them to voluntarily collaborate with us, at least in the beginning
 
that's fair, though you actually mentioned BOTH the chance to get some territory, or to actually partition the country.

Magic items trading deals and magical knowledge might actually be of more worth to us than more territory though. It would depend.

You're right, i'm probably overstating the chance of "terrorists". There's also the fact that it's very likely this kingdom is actually very young.

I doubt Maretonia could have prospered while Discord was around.

Of course we could probably win a LOT of support by simply being a good ruler and introducing some of our tech.

Still, while having the support of "the common people" is good and usefull, that by itself won't be enough. We'll need the support of the merchants (doable, giving them access to many new goods and foreign markets will certainly help) and at least part of the nobility.

The last part will be the hardest. We could reasonably find some pegasi simpathizers (we do share a somewhat similar military culture/past), but the unicorn nobility will be the hardest to get on our side. Killing them all has its possible consequences, as does leaving them alive. I doubt we can get more than a small minority on them to voluntarily collaborate with us, at least in the beginning
Usually, the 'merchant's method of solving problems is a decent way to do things. Give them what they want. Or, sell them something they didnt know they wanted.

So, why slavery? I can see 3 pillars supporting it. Tradition, power, and economic potential.

Economic potential we replace with our technology pretty easily. That, and we can prove, well enough, that circulating money is WAAAAY better economically than it is lying stagnant in vaults. Give your workers money, they use it to acquire goods that you help produce, thus going back in your own pocket, etc.

Power wise... well, nothing quite will beat straight up owning someone, as much as I hate to say it. Best one could do is try to sell them on the idea that mercantilism is the way of the future, and the nobility has all the money atm. Slavery cannot and will not last, but they can retain their status and vast wealth, and even increase said wealth if they shift that wealth into enterprises.

Tradition is by far the most difficult. Some are just stuck in their ways and will refuse to budge. Some may be swayed by the idea of 'become a member of the new founding traditions,' but most will probably be set on slave owning. Only thing I can really think will help there is time and hope with their deaths the sentiment will die off, or if the incentives are great enough to overpower the need for slavery.
 
Not to misrepresent your point but you mentioned 'entire country' I specifically mentioned only taking some strategic territory not all of it.

Moreover, I think people are really overstating the possibility of 'terrorists' which is more modern then what we would get. This is not the modern world which is defined by nationalism it is a largely medieval one where the boundaries are determined by the monarchs possessions and national identity is much more fluid. There is absolutely a risk of internal resistance but that mainly comes from the nobility being threatened by their loss of privilege and way of life to a new more powerful ruler. Basically in Maretonia's case if we invade under the circumstances discussed the common people will largely accept us as long as we treat them the same of better to previous rulership but the Pegasus unicorn nobility will through a fit that will be trouble some unless they are too weakened to fight back. For an example see how we were able to make imperials out of the crystal empire with little resistance since there nobility was gutted despite the difference in species.
Not necessarily true. See the Hundred Year's War, which while a dynastic conflict, actually had nationalism rise throughout it between France and England (though you could possibly blame that on how long it went on and say that they formed those identities because of said war). Also we already had Maretonia mention national sovereignty so they may be further along with that idea, and we ourselves have formed an extremely nationalistic nation explicitly because of how good we are as a Emperor to our people. Heck, we may have completely cemented a sense of nationalism in our people just because of how good we were/are. Nationalism rises because they associate their country with something good, if the common freed people in Maretonia (who outnumber the slaves by the way) associate their country as being awesome for some reason and/or view themselves as a rising power, unless we can be quick enough to show them life under us are better, they may become revolutionaries anyway.

Also even though we overall have medieval technology, we are also running around with fairly advanced cannons and flamethrowers, so we're not completely medieval all around, not to mention magic can basically take the place of normal technological development, so societies may have more advanced ideas than they seemingly should.
 
Last edited:
I would like to mention that while all this talk about civil war is interesting there is possibility of abolitionists not wanting to cause civil war, also Queen seems like reasonable and somewhat capable person who probably won't let things escalate.

There are quite few historical examples of slavery ending peacefully without civil war in European countries , or while not slavery russian abolition of serfdom.
there are also quite a few example of slavery ending in civil war. The American Civil War is the main one that comes to mind.

I don't actually remember the peaceful cases, care to share? I'm curious to see how the transition worked.

I'm not sure it really matters if the abolitionists want to cause the civil war or not. If they want to press for results quickly, war is inevitable unless they manage a coup, or a covert alliance with the queen (followed by assassinations of the more dangerous nobles).

If they're willing to wait, then it will take years, possibly decades, before they get the results they wish for.

And about the Queen...well, she seem reasonable as in "won't do obviously stupid things likely to end up in threatening her position or gaining her more enemies". So she's smarter than Brochard, whose more generous description would be "hilariously short-sighted"

We don't know anything else about her personality, her morality and her ethics. She might decide a civil war is what she needs to further consolidate power in her hands hooves.

All in all the queen is an enigma to us, beside "she has basic competence, can be somewhat reasoned with, won't pull a Brochard and end up with all her followers hating and betraying her"
Usually, the 'merchant's method of solving problems is a decent way to do things. Give them what they want. Or, sell them something they didnt know they wanted.

So, why slavery? I can see 3 pillars supporting it. Tradition, power, and economic potential.

Economic potential we replace with our technology pretty easily. That, and we can prove, well enough, that circulating money is WAAAAY better economically than it is lying stagnant in vaults. Give your workers money, they use it to acquire goods that you help produce, thus going back in your own pocket, etc.

when i searched for a recettear meme, i didn't expect to find this!
...i kinda want to play it again now...it's been a while...
Power wise... well, nothing quite will beat straight up owning someone, as much as I hate to say it. Best one could do is try to sell them on the idea that mercantilism is the way of the future, and the nobility has all the money atm. Slavery cannot and will not last, but they can retain their status and vast wealth, and even increase said wealth if they shift that wealth into enterprises.

Tradition is by far the most difficult. Some are just stuck in their ways and will refuse to budge. Some may be swayed by the idea of 'become a member of the new founding traditions,' but most will probably be set on slave owning. Only thing I can really think will help there is time and hope with their deaths the sentiment will die off, or if the incentives are great enough to overpower the need for slavery.
power wise i suppose one could remark how money=power, and that paid people will do their job much better if their paid for it. "Wouldn't you like your slaves to actually TRY to do their best work for you? You can't trust a slave to do his best as you can a man pony moved by greed".

not much else that we can do about tradition though (other what you already said)
 
our best bet is to lock down the borders around Maretonia to prevent land raids, have our and the Neighpon navies run anti-priate partols to intradite sea raiding and announce a law that any slave that makes it into imperial (the Crystal protectorate counts for this) is automaticly free and under the protection of the empire.

then we sit on the border, deal with any slaver raids and let the aboluininists run an underground railroad to siphon off Maretonia's slave population. as long as we don't fire the frist shot the queen won't risk war when our forces are postioned to kick the ass of any attempts at attacking. if the nobles throw a hissy fit we simply claim that all the slaver bands were pirates and bandits which will give the queen a fig leaf to tell them to piss off with.
 
Seems like a few people are discussing potentially introducing some of our tech to Maretonia with the intent of making slavery seem less desirable. I would like to point out that in the United States prior to the cotton gin, slavery was on the decline since it was expensive to support slaves compared to the income of cotton. Then the cotton gin came along and all of a sudden demand for slaves skyrocketed. Granted, this is a specific case and unlikely to occur, but it's something I feel worth mentioning and considering.

Edit because my brain is slow: I just now realize that this point could be moot since they could have a magical equivalent. And if they don't, some genius might try to make a magical equivalent. Yay.
 
Last edited:
Seems like a few people are discussing potentially introducing some of our tech to Maretonia with the intent of making slavery seem less desirable. I would like to point out that in the United States prior to the cotton gin, slavery was on the decline since it was expensive to support slaves compared to the income of cotton. Then the cotton gin came along and all of a sudden demand for slaves skyrocketed. Granted, this is a specific case and unlikely to occur, but it's something I feel worth mentioning and considering.
Oh, I know. Presented it ad an option if they abandoned slavery, rather than as something to do while they still have it. And definitely not quite immediately.
 
that's fair, though you actually mentioned BOTH the chance to get some territory, or to actually partition the country.

Magic items trading deals and magical knowledge might actually be of more worth to us than more territory though. It would depend.

You're right, i'm probably overstating the chance of "terrorists". There's also the fact that it's very likely this kingdom is actually very young.

I doubt Maretonia could have prospered while Discord was around.

Of course we could probably win a LOT of support by simply being a good ruler and introducing some of our tech.

Still, while having the support of "the common people" is good and usefull, that by itself won't be enough. We'll need the support of the merchants (doable, giving them access to many new goods and foreign markets will certainly help) and at least part of the nobility.

The last part will be the hardest. We could reasonably find some pegasi simpathizers (we do share a somewhat similar military culture/past), but the unicorn nobility will be the hardest to get on our side. Killing them all has its possible consequences, as does leaving them alive. I doubt we can get more than a small minority on them to voluntarily collaborate with us, at least in the beginning
Thank you for your considerate response, that is so sadly rare on the internet. I forgot about the fact I put both on their so I apologize for that my mistake. I do agree about the nobility being the hard part and as much as a part of me would enjoy killing them all it is probably counter productive. My initial thought is to confiscate their property and give it to our supporters or former slaves, the rich might hate it but they won't matter if they are no longer rich. Though that also runs into the problem of alienation them as much has killing them might when they still have social clout and connection to stir up trouble, no perfect solutions it is a matter of effort.

Not necessarily true. See the Hundred Year's War, which while a dynastic conflict, actually had nationalism rise throughout it between France and England (though you could possibly blame that on how long it went on and say that they formed those identities because of said war). Also we already had Maretonia mention national sovereignty so they may be further along with that idea, and we ourselves have formed an extremely nationalistic nation explicitly because of how good we are as a Emperor to our people. Heck, we may have completely cemented a sense of nationalism in our people just because of how good we were/are. Nationalism rises because they associate their country with something good, if the common freed people in Maretonia (who outnumber the slaves by the way) associate their country as being awesome for some reason and/or view themselves as a rising power, unless we can be quick enough to show them life under us are better, they may become revolutionaries anyway.

Also even though we overall have medieval technology, we are also running around with fairly advanced cannons and flamethrowers, so we're not completely medieval all around, not to mention magic can basically take the place of normal technological development, so societies may have more advanced ideas than they seemingly should.
As much as I like arguments about history and would love to talk about the thirties year war (Have you read the 1632 series? it is great if a little bloated lately.), I am going to try to avoid that hear since it really isn't the time or place.

Overall, I am just going to say even though the direct definition and therefore timing of nationalism is debatable, I don't think it applies to Maretonia.

Even though we have some forms of more advanced technology then medieval or early modern tech as far as we have seen Maretonia is lacking in the presence of mass media that usually can be considered necessary for the kind of we have now even with magic. Maretonia and most nations right now are relatively young due to discord so likely hasn't really made a national identity like we have since their haven't even gotten control of their nobility yet. They don't have a unifying myth like we have made of the Emperor reuniting the broken kingdom and bravely fighting the dark wizard Sombra and all his horrors, we could possible give them that via invasion as a foreign invader but as you said a part of that is often that the conflict is long, protracted and brutal which we are trying to avoid. Based on what we see of Maretonia, where everything is run by a de-facto racial caste system with powerful nobles I don't think the free population get much benefit from it or see it as worth much as compared to the nobility who really benefit from it.

So yer while you are right about something close to nationalism being possible before the usual advent of it with the rise of mass media later on I don't think it will apply here unless things go very wrong with our approach.
 
Thank you for your considerate response, that is so sadly rare on the internet. I forgot about the fact I put both on their so I apologize for that my mistake. I do agree about the nobility being the hard part and as much as a part of me would enjoy killing them all it is probably counter productive. My initial thought is to confiscate their property and give it to our supporters or former slaves, the rich might hate it but they won't matter if they are no longer rich. Though that also runs into the problem of alienation them as much has killing them might when they still have social clout and connection to stir up trouble, no perfect solutions it is a matter of effort.
First of all, you're welcome. I always enjoy a good argument, no matter if it shares my position or not. Honestly a good argument against what i say it's even better, as it possibly gives me something to learn, or a point of view i didn't consider. It's also more enjoyable. There is not much discussion to be had if everyone agrees from the start. And nothing kills a discussion like a "why? because i say so!"

Now, killing everyone is always tempting, but it risks gaining us sworn enemies. It's unlikely we'd get everyone, and in a setting with magic and world-ending villains we'd prefer avoiding those. Especially as those enemies would most likely be unicorns. We don't want another Sombra, or a Pony of Shadow, or a Nightmare, or whatever else Questor could come up with. We already have enough coming from canon without adding new ones.

confiscating their riches is a possible option, but we need to be carefull as well, at least in part for the reasons already written above.

Nobles are after all the more likely to possess dangerous magical knowledge in Maretonia. For all we know we might push them in a "deal with the devil" if we're not carefull. No more dangerous beast or person than a cornered one. Give them a way out and they might be willing to negotiate.

There is also the fact that, from a legal standpoint, slavers are not doing anything wrong. Immoral, certainly, but not illegal (according to their laws). And following laws is important if we want to mantain order and legitimacy.

I'm blabbering a bit, what i mean is basically:

1)Once/when we manage to get slavery abolished we should be relatively lenient with ex-slavers who are willing to be reasonable.
2)Once the laws we want are in place we should act (or push whatever Government there is at that point) to act decisively to enforce them. We don't want slavery to simply be pushed to the underground, we want it completely destroyed.

As much as I like arguments about history and would love to talk about the thirties year war (Have you read the 1632 series? it is great if a little bloated lately.), I am going to try to avoid that hear since it really isn't the time or place.

Overall, I am just going to say even though the direct definition and therefore timing of nationalism is debatable, I don't think it applies to Maretonia.

Even though we have some forms of more advanced technology then medieval or early modern tech as far as we have seen Maretonia is lacking in the presence of mass media that usually can be considered necessary for the kind of we have now even with magic. Maretonia and most nations right now are relatively young due to discord so likely hasn't really made a national identity like we have since their haven't even gotten control of their nobility yet. They don't have a unifying myth like we have made of the Emperor reuniting the broken kingdom and bravely fighting the dark wizard Sombra and all his horrors, we could possible give them that via invasion as a foreign invader but as you said a part of that is often that the conflict is long, protracted and brutal which we are trying to avoid. Based on what we see of Maretonia, where everything is run by a de-facto racial caste system with powerful nobles I don't think the free population get much benefit from it or see it as worth much as compared to the nobility who really benefit from it.

So yer while you are right about something close to nationalism being possible before the usual advent of it with the rise of mass media later on I don't think it will apply here unless things go very wrong with our approach.
about the unifying myth, they might have one that we don't know of. They might even have the same one as Equestria, The Fires of Friendships that brought an end to the conflict between the pony tribes (though if they do they're not really following the spirit of it, though they DO claim formal equality between their citizens and slavery IS applied to all three races (though to earth ponies much more than to the pegasi and unicorns))

They ARE (at least formally) beyond the time of conflict between the tribes (though i find likely (or at least possible) the existance of racial segregation laws similar to what the usa had in the past, along the lines of "separate but equal". I'm definitely not an expert though, i don't really know that much about how it really was)



About the mass media...It's unlikely, but they COULD have at least newspapers. Have pegasi carry at least one copy of it to every town, then have local unicorns use some kind of duplicating/book copying spell, or some magical items with that kind of power.

Unlikely, but possible.


...on that note, do WE have printing tech?
 
If we don't happen I expect it to happen VERY soon, with the university. Getting everyone their own book would probably be a high priority.
Yes, you have printing presses. Building a full university would be...not impossible, but extremely difficult without them.

I'd thought about making the development of such a learning action, but that would have just been another "you need to do this to do something else" Action, and I didn't really want to do that.
 
Back
Top