You talk like villains don't usually have legitimate reasons to do what they do. Like, do you believe that a villain is someone who does bad shit because they are cruel? So, like, apparently Sauron is not a villain. And Jafar. And Darth Vader. And Magneto. And Davy Jones. Well, I disagree. Having reasons doesn't excuse your actions. Doing evil shit for good reasons makes you evil.
Not quite. There is a difference between having a selfish and/ or harmful reason (greed, lashing out to everyone guilty or not because of a tragedy) and a good reason (protecting your friends, acting on necessity or self defense). Sure, there are reasons that are morally grey or inbetween (attacking innocents to make the world better) but in most cases , people argue about whether the person commiting these crimes is villainous or not. Hypocrisy, also plays a part, morality is way way too complicated to make it a simple calculation
The distinction I made, however, was between a person who only hurts in defense, and people who actively go after innocents, combined with the fact one can be overall good even if they commit some evil actions based upon greater context, and vice versa. Meizhen goes hog against enemy combatants, but only if they are actively threatening her or her friends with.
I mean. The same excuses can be used for Liling or Zihao. Liling grew up to fight Bai and Bai are treacherous. How do you beat a machiavellian? Do you play their game? No. You jump the table and smash their head to mush.
of course, Liling swiftly found out what happens when you fail to play the social game. Words are very important in a violent society. Keeps things ordered and understandable. Law of the Jungle is chaos.
Zihao is willing to murder if he can get away with it, because the only kind of war is Total War. Ain't no middle ground with these bad-guys. They'll do whatever it takes to crush you, so you have to be the same.
Of course, this is a totally unnuanced view and understanding. There are no barbs, no human existential threats to Heavenly Peaks, there are only other humans living in this deathworld and how you treat them is going to be how they respond. If you go in with the mindset of Total War they will adapt and commit to the same. It's not a guarantee that these other cultures also believe there is no war but Total War.
Can you say the same, Imperial?
honestly the only character that didn't come across as complex/nuanced was NastyBat. But that was because most of us have collective trauma from people/characters like that we've experienced blindsiding us in life/stories and the RR rewrite is *so* much more correct in terms of tone.
nobody is evil or good in a deathworld per se. I believe it's more helpful to think of it like: There are successful groups, and failing groups. If you don't succeed, the world kills you. If you do succeed, the survivors will tend to agree that your ends justified your means. It's a very unfortunate and relativistic morality but it's necessary to view it in that lens when there are explicit existential threats to humanity lurking about waiting for us to be too weak to fend them off. Everyone entrenches in their traditional Ways even if those "Traditions" have been slowly warped overtime into failing and ailing anachronisms that are actively antagonizing those in the region.
the proof that the traditions have been warped or misinterpreted is that there was a golden era, and now there is mass struggling, and the knowledge base available to pull from is largely the same. It's not the fault of the elders or the traditions themselves, it's the fault of the interpreters that are getting it wrong. That is why I seem to have a bias against tradition/familyhistory. It's because the traditions clearly had a golden age where they worked very well, and are currently falling into mass disrepair. My money is that some non-whites had incomplete understanding when they tried to implement the old traditions, and they slowly became less and less functional.
Golden Fields currently looks like what any given province would look like in a mass-fail-state. Apocalypse, loss of knowledge and ways and traditions, rampant and persistent death.
Liling isn't a villain because she tried to fight Bai in her terms. However, her law of the jungle was not a gambit against Bai, it was against Cai. Cai did nothing but propose not shitting where one eats. She is a villain because she actively tried putting a law of the jungle into effect for no good reason.
Zihao of course is evil not solely because of his mindset, but also because he applies no standards to himself. This kind of action would be wrong but somewhat justifiable if the dude didn't use his guys like pawns and if he didn't view commoners as expendable, but its obvious his morality is self serving.
I also do not believe in relativistic morality. Grey morality yes, but grey morality has shades--some light enough to be good even if not white, some dark enough to be evil even if not black, and some where I cannot say.
She was beating up and torturing laborers, not combatants or saboteurs. Or at least there's no evidence they were; the scene we have is some disciples being ambushed while gathering materials. As far as I can recall, Renshu never seriously employed human combatants.
Her motives do not make her a good person, really. Practically everyone has "good" motives. Granpa Sun led a ruinously self-destructive crusade against the jungle barbarians, genocided a whole bunch of them, and abandoned hundreds of thousands to millions of mortals to die back in Thousand Lakes. He did it all for revenge, for his family, to end what he viewed as an existential threat. None of that frees him from the moral consequences of his actions, and he's solidly in the murky regions of "gray" there, at best. Which is what people are saying about Meizhen.
You do remember that collecting cultivation material means hunting monsters, yes? She beat up the guys that were sent to sabotage Ling Qi's mission, she didn't beat farmers and crafters.
And I never claimed that one is good or evil solely due to motives or backstory. That said, whether granpa Sun is actually a villain is, too, not yet known. And I do not disagree about the consequences, but at the same vein, paragons of justice had committed actions with bad consequences, that does not make them the villains.
In my book, villainy and heroism do not exist in a vacuum. That does not mean that I think background or intent justifies everything. But if you manage to raise yourself above your backround and your world, you are heroic, while if you fall below them, you are villainous. Bai keeps raising herself above it. Zihao and Liling keep sinking below it. Similarly, altruistic intend helps, while hubris (I know best...even when I am proven wrong) or selfishness (in the colloquial "I want it all no matter who I hurt" way, not in the "I actually want good things for myself" way Ling Qi uses it) also factor in.