I know it's unrealistic and will probably not happen, but the idea of us continuing to improve our electronic's durability to the point that they outstrip our armor amuses me. Smart Armor.
need help coming up with stories, both old and new?
Like the idea of a serpant that changes gender each time they shedding their skin in ancient mythology on the island.
Maybe intertwined with the story of a dragon prince from under the sea?
But either way, I am enjoying this quest a lot.
I know it's unrealistic and will probably not happen, but the idea of us continuing to improve our electronic's durability to the point that they outstrip our armor amuses me. Smart Armor.
Now imagine if we did it with lasers or electromagnetic fields instead of normal projectiles? Boom, energy shields , a future goal perhaps? Anyways, yeah, I concur about active protection systems, and with our electronics durability adding them shouldn't decrease the overall durability of an Iron Tiger by much.I mean, if you're willing to go metaphorical, that's just Drozd.
We have better electronics, so we could probably improve on the original Soviet design. Frnakly active protection systems woudl be particularly usefull for protecting mechs that can't afford to carry as much armor as a tank.
If you have a positive CO, you'll get the information, mainly due to you being the main navy port of the Chinese, and them wanting you to have the data so you won't freak out when the Chinese Navy does tests, thinking the Americans are firing torpedos.@HeroCooky, apparently the PRC recovered an American ADCAP topredo sometime between 1975 and 1985 and reverse engineered some of it's key components like Otto Fuel II, would this info be shared with Guangchou when we go to develop our own torpedo?
And is it a roll to determine if it's been butterflied?
Hey, due to divergent tech, should we roll to see if projects like the Lockheed C-1201? Or would someone need to write an omake about the subject in order for a roll to be made? I'm mostly asking because if it does end up existing we could see the US fielding mechs from giant nuclear powered flying fortresses, and that appeals to me on a visceral level.
Bit smaller then the ones we built. I think it would be a 3 or 4 meter model.It would really require some sort of unobtainium for radiation shielding/neutron reflection. Like, meta-stable metallic hydrogen would do it... if it existed.
I made a Guangchou Pintrest Board. It has pretty pictures of heavy machinery, for all your otaku needs.
edit: This is what I envision our Iron Tigers look like. THe baby-carrier cockpit seems like the most practical for leaving the pilots legs free enough to move.
Bit smaller then the ones we built. I think it would be a 3 or 4 meter model.
Aren't the cockpits sealed though? I though @HeroCooky had posted some images of them earlier in the thread.edit: This is what I envision our Iron Tigers look like. THe baby-carrier cockpit seems like the most practical for leaving the pilots legs free enough to move.
Aren't the cockpits sealed though? I though @HeroCooky had posted some images of them earlier in the thread.
Edit: Yeah, they posted photos back here.
*looks closer*
Huh. I thought the cockpit was just unsealed in the pic but there's no cover for the arms so I guess not.
They're BASED on the pics, they're not exactly like the pics. Plus our first IT has SCARS. It's essentially a sealed environment to safeguard against any outside threats similar to chemical weapons. We got a 14 on d20 on that roll iirc, so it at least meets our minimum requirements.
Oh they'e sealed. We have SCARS for that. Theoretically, they work well. But that's only as far as trials go. We've yet to put them through actual combat, after all.
Mobile Heavy AT/I/A with broadly applicable combat-engineering added, if current modules are applied.What role(s) are the ITs built for?
IFV tend to hover around 20 tonnes, MBTs are 50+ tonnes, 8x8 trucks are probably the closest in terms of vehicle mass/payload ratio but the ITs are too compact to carry a similar degree of bulk.
Mobile Heavy AT/I/A with broadly applicable combat-engineering added, if current modules are applied.
The Iron Tiger "Iron Tiger"-Line is modular, and as such can be used for whatever purpose you need, if you have the modules for such.
Anti-Tank/Infantry/Air. One of your modules is basically a tri-barrel 57mm AZP S-60, while you have a back-mounted auto-cannon capable of (limited, prototypical) automated/pre-planned fire with different ammunition types.
Anti-Tank/Infantry/Air. One of your modules is basically a tri-barrel 57mm AZP S-60, while you have a back-mounted auto-cannon capable of (limited, prototypical) automated/pre-planned fire with different ammunition types.
Yes, thats right. Though, right now may not be the best time to spice things up with new weapon systems.So more of a tank destroyer in the AT role?
And we don't really have a way to compare how good they are in a role without making a traditional vehicle that ALSO uses IT tech and then running some wargames, right?
You are sending observers/volunteers to North Vietnam, though it is already 1974. and most people in the know are seeing the writing on the wall due to butterflies and rolls. Vietnam will win around a month sooner than OTL.Question but are we sending advisors in Vietnam and if so I have a target that could help shift the war in the north's favor a lot faster than IRL.
Yes, thats right. Though, right now may not be the best time to spice things up with new weapon systems.
TBF, we really ought to focus on upgrading our logistics and C4I first. A modular skateboard chassis and a transport aircraft would be good.