Springtime of Nations II: A European Republic Quest

[X] Refuse to negotiate.

I understand that we can torpedo negotiations to resume the war. I'm however fearful that they might accept our demands. There's also the risk of us losing more unreasonable by piling on demands onto Austria and Russia to the point were us getting a positive view for being diplomatic may be rendered moot.

Therefore I see no need to pretend to make peace with them. Why waste time when Russia's reeling and our allies are in Austria? Modest gains over the winter would be very nice.
I'd like to encourage everyone to read this take, because I think it's important.
 
Hm I've been wondering...

@Etranger is it possible for us to get Russia to exit the war separately, shrinking the scope of the war to Allies vs Austria?
 
Wasn't the entire reason we pandered to the Entente with the Scandinavian negotiations to allow us to ignore things like this? We're now surrendering the initiative after Russia just massively fucked up for, what, a negotiation we plan to torpedo anyways under the assumption it'll make us look "reasonable"? I could stomach it when it wasn't impacting the war effort, but come on now! Handing Russia another million men on the Polish Front for, what, a little more entente goodwill, after we already handed them a massive appeasement with Scandinavia?

Vote no negotiations! We must keep the initative to avoid more German lives being lost unnecessarily in the name of "appearing peaceful!"
 
@monty
The actual exchange was this:


"Making unacceptable demands could be less bad, Entente-opinion-wise, than refusing to negotiate" is not the same as "making unacceptable demands will be less bad than refusing to negotiate," and moreover doesn't foreclose the possibility that making unacceptable demands could be worse than refusing to negotiate.
 
[X] Refuse to negotiate.

It is true that this war has been expensive and that a pause for a ceasefire might be beneficial in strengthening our forces. However…



Specifically, a message to everyone still oppressed by the Habsburg and Romanov monarchies (not to mention the empires of the Entente) that our goal is not just claiming territory for our nation but the complete destruction of the tyranny under which they're living.
 
Wasn't the entire reason we pandered to the Entente with the Scandinavian negotiations to allow us to ignore things like this? We're now surrendering the initiative after Russia just massively fucked up for, what, a negotiation we plan to torpedo anyways under the assumption it'll make us look "reasonable"? I could stomach it when it wasn't impacting the war effort, but come on now! Handing Russia another million men on the Polish Front for, what, a little more entente goodwill, after we already handed them a massive appeasement with Scandinavia?
Goodwill which we've burned by annexing Bohemia. Sure, it was a free and fair election, but the rest of the world outside the Alliance disagrees. We and Italy can amass millions more of reasonably-trained men still, and we could also reenlarge our ammo & armaments stockpile. Either refuse this deal and end the war sooner than we would prefer, or try to find a way to delay that inevitable Entente-enforced end.

"Making unacceptable demands could be less bad, Entente-opinion-wise, than refusing to negotiate" is not the same as "making unacceptable demands will be less bad than refusing to negotiate," and moreover doesn't foreclose the possibility that making unacceptable demands could be worse than refusing to negotiate.
Which is why we should design the "peace deal package" in such a way as to still curb the diplomatic hit - and accordingly, subsequent acceleration of Entente involvement & an earlier end to the war than we prefer - that refusing a peace deal outright would have caused, while still allowing us to continue the war. Especially if we could leverage a Russian exit while still achieving liberation of Poland.
 
Which is why we should design the "peace deal package" in such a way as to still curb the diplomatic hit - and accordingly, subsequent acceleration of Entente involvement & an earlier end to the war than we prefer - that refusing a peace deal outright would have caused, while still allowing us to continue the war. Especially if we could leverage a Russian exit while still achieving liberation of Poland.
If it's using the leverage system used last time, anything below 0 will cause an international relations hit, and only things below a certain threshold of negative numbers will cause auto-refusal, so, this is nowhere near guaranteed to happen.
 
If it's using the leverage system used last time, anything below 0 will cause an international relations hit, and only things below a certain threshold of negative numbers will cause auto-refusal, so, this is nowhere near guaranteed to happen.
Etranger has also made it clear that certain options are more or less palatable to certain powers. It should be perfectly feasible to design a peace package that favors the Entente while being unacceptable to the league.
 
If it's using the leverage system used last time, anything below 0 will cause an international relations hit, and only things below a certain threshold of negative numbers will cause auto-refusal, so, this is nowhere near guaranteed to happen.
Refusing outright after our CB (a ship that's questionable if Austria is involved at all) is, I figured, worse than anything above -3 (auto-rejected proposal). And the lower the leverage differential gets before that point, the less likely they'll accept our counter-offer - opting to either reject or propose their own counter-offer.

We could aim for the -2 level in negotiations for that possibility. Of course if making Russia exit is also a great advantage - provided they concede to liberated Poland. IMO not improbable if the alternative is continuing to bleed for our imminent dissolution of the Quaruple Monarchy
 
[X] Refuse to negotiate.

I think the diplomatic arguments for negotiating are strong but I really don't understand the operational pause ones. On their side, one belligerents army is in near complete collapse and the other is functional but running low on reserves. On the other, the German army is battered but standing strong and the Italian army is only just getting in on the action. Sure, our army could use the break - but they need it much much much more.
 
@monty
The actual exchange was this:


"Making unacceptable demands could be less bad, Entente-opinion-wise, than refusing to negotiate" is not the same as "making unacceptable demands will be less bad than refusing to negotiate," and moreover doesn't foreclose the possibility that making unacceptable demands could be worse than refusing to negotiate.
oh, i see. that is quite different.
 
[X] Refuse to negotiate.
I won't settle for less than the total dissolution of Austria and the dethroning of the Hapsburgs and what is on the table is a deal to preserve that throne.
 
[X] Refuse to negotiate.

It is true that this war has been expensive and that a pause for a ceasefire might be beneficial in strengthening our forces. However…



Specifically, a message to everyone still oppressed by the Habsburg and Romanov monarchies (not to mention the empires of the Entente) that our goal is not just claiming territory for our nation but the complete destruction of the tyranny under which they're living.

This is an excellent point actually. The Imperial League likely won't be able to turn the war around in three months, but they could easily use the time to crack down on revolutionary groups with their freed up manpower. They could crack down on Polish partisans in occupied Poland, deport German radicals from Prussia to Siberia, and start executing every socialist they get their hands. Three months gives them time to start hammering every radical group hard while they have the chance.
 
Back
Top