Orc Quest; or, A Critical Examination of Agency Through in Interactive Fiction (Warcraft)

[X] Accept the warlocks' aid.

If not from his father, then how would they know of him? In Alterac news travel very slowly, especially for Syndicate who has no network outside it. So how would the know who is leading this force and who's the father of the leader? If not grom him, if they somehow scryed MC. Then MC will find out soon, besides he already has followers with questionable allegiance. It's not like it will do worse, is it?

Besides, it's the matter of survival. If MC deny them, then he must destroy them for they will sides with the enemy. With denying them we essentially are cornering the animal and it will lash out.

Little Timmy:It was a Dreadlord what tol' 'em good sir.
 
I do recall you have some a warlock or two.
You've got Zaruk the Twilight's Hammer guy and Keldran who's a necrolyte but cross trained as a warlock. You'll probably also have a few low level warlocks from the penal groups or others who've joined you.
No sign of the black dragons though.
I mean there very much is lol
If we can get WOG that we can keep them secret then I'll change my vote, but until then I don't want to risk it on an assumption since that hasn't worked out for us historically speaking.
This would depend what you want WOG on. I'm perfectly happy to answer things in or out of character. For example, you're still in command, you can just forbid them from doing high level demon stuff and limit them to throwing fire at people and that would be reasonably able to keep them 'secret'.
I had actually forgotten this I need to put a couple of lines in about it

(did they even ~try~ to come up with better verifiable lies???),
Problem is they're sensibly relying on Grok's relative ignorance in terms of Burning Legion Blade ops.

If not from his father, then how would they know of him? In Alterac news travel very slowly, especially for Syndicate who has no network outside it. So how would the know who is leading this force and who's the father of the leader? If not grom him, if they somehow scryed MC.
Keep in mind you've been wandering about doing stuff in the Eastern Kingdoms for some time now. There's been a reaonable amount of time to do stuff. Hammerfell hadn't heard of you or gotten news because they're very isolated, whereas people like Nagaz and co may not be.
 
Wait, was that a lie?

I was assuming that was Grok's ignorance talking!
Fundamentally this is a question of Grok's (or the players') assessment of Feldad's policies. Grok knows Feldad lies a lot or at least conceals things habitually, he knows that the clan are involved in extensive intrigues. It might not be that surprising that Feldad has other agents he's not mentioned, indeed Grok sort of knows this given the whole mystery of what's going on in Desolace. Grok also knows Feldad has given secret instructions to people like Sesk before, and as such again it might not be impossible that he just wouldn't mention Nagaz etc. However, Grok believes that Feldad would have told him this sort of thing, which is why he thinks Nagaz is lying.
 
It was a habit you'd taken to recently, to better feel the roll and coil of Myzrael, barely restrained in her bonds of hatred, ready to leap forth to slaughter.

I really hope we can cure her from the madness someday.

Alas, Haomarush, the Blademaster who commands the Blackrock of the north, was always suspicious of us and has finally turned to madness, and now seeks to destroy you.

Ah yes, of course the Blademaster that's our enemy has gone crazy, how convenient!

Yeah I don't trust this guys at all, not to mention, didn't we already have some Orcs talking in demon tongue towards us as if we would like it?

I already feel like we have some trouble in our ranks that this will just make things even worse.

And even if we tell them not to do strong demonic things, who is to say they would obey if we aren't near? That just feels like a bad roll away from a bomb exploding in our ranks.

[X] Deny the warlocks' aid.
 
Alright then, let's see...

wowpedia.fandom.com

Argus Wake

The Argus Wake are a mysterious group allied to the Syndicate in Alterac. According to Thrall, they are members of the Shadow Council.[2]

...

In addition, we have urged the Syndicate to aim for the city of Stromgarde in the nearby Arathi Highlands. The city is a battlefield between our forces, ogres and the humans of Stromgarde, but we feel that with careful tactics we will own this once great city.

And when this is done, the next stage of our plan may begin. With a nation of our own and a base of power in this region, we may then prepare the way for the Third Host.

Soon, the Legion Lords will reward our works by raining fire from the skies once again!

The Council was wise to appoint you head of the Argus Wake, marshal of their strategies in the land of humans and dwarves. And I am honored to serve as the hand of your will in Alterac.

In Sargeras' Name,

Nagaz, Argus Heirophan

Third Host refers to the third invasion of the Burning Legion, so that's a big NOPE for me.
 
We can either create a prosperous Kingdom of Orcs and Men, that will make Umbar/Harad/Karak Five Peaks/etc. pale in comparison...
or we can be pulled in the intrigues of the demons of the Burninating Legion.
I know what I would choose.
[X] Deny the warlocks' aid.

The only reason to hesitate is "can we order them not to do stuff if they are with us? Maybe better than leaving them to their own devices". But if they summon a demon we can declare it a crime and still arrest them.
 
Would love to keep them around, if only to keep an eye on them cause they're total dicks but...
[X] Deny the warlocks' aid.

something something go get new orders from dad we don't want his assets.
 
Let me guess they infiltrated those assassins and shape shifted as humans.
Well yes, Fahrad, the named assassin, is indeed a dragon. I do sometimes have original characters for particular reasons, for example Vark, Angrais (who was actually @Doomed Wombat's character not mine), but otherwise I think everyone's been canonical. Obviously I tend to adapt people but still.

Would also say I suppose that I don't necessarily expect people to be constantly looking things up. That Dathrohan is a dreadlord is farily well understood by most people familiar with WoW, but for example Fahrad turns up in a rogue questline from several expansions ago so fewer people would know who he was.

Comparably, there's stuff that's in story, which I do expect people to be considering, for example the ambiguity with the Burning Blade in this story is essential to a player's understnading of what's going on. If I revealed that Feldad was doing something susicious I don't want anyone being surprised because they've just not been paying attentoin etc.
 
To note that a vote to deny them would require a diplo roll to see if Grok offends them etc, and would subsequently have a roll for their reaction, whereas they wouldn't have such rolls if you accepted them
 
To note that a vote to deny them would require a diplo roll to see if Grok offends them etc, and would subsequently have a roll for their reaction, whereas they wouldn't have such rolls if you accepted them
I'm cool with that personally.

If they take too much offense they may go hostile. Then there is a chance Grok can kill them.

I'm a bit less okay with that, I worry as to what a dedicated shadow organization may do to us if they should ever find that they want to harm us. Considering that and our penchant for low rolls at the worst of times, I'm reconsidering my vote.
@FractiousDay to be clear, we can take them on without taking them in, right? Can we work with them without having them in our warband and corrupting our people from within?
 
I think the black dragons like Grok well enough to keep him safe besides the remaining blademaster bodyguard who's meant to keep Grok safe per the orders of da chief.
 
To note that a vote to deny them would require a diplo roll to see if Grok offends them etc, and would subsequently have a roll for their reaction, whereas they wouldn't have such rolls if you accepted them

Meh, we're always at the mercy of rolls anyway.

When our options are:

A) Rolls that may fuck us over now

B) Rolls that may fuck us over later

Then may as well just focus on what direction we would like the narrative to go.
 
@FractiousDay to be clear, we can take them on without taking them in, right? Can we work with them without having them in our warband and corrupting our people from within?
At the moment, you're quite busy fighting a military campaign. There's a lot of shouting and marching going on, so for example while Grok is concerned that demon worshippers have already infiltrated his warband, he's occupied. After that's done when Grok is ruling Alterac (or whatever else he decides to do), that would be the time to establish cultural factors for example.

If you chose to accept them, you obviously would have significantly more control over what they're doing than if you refused them. Similarly, if they're near you they're not going to be able to do anything overt without you noticing. Whether they'd go about whispering stuff is a separate matter, but yes you could have them watched etc.

Don't think I'd allow what I think you're suggesting, which would be to accept them but deploy them separately somehow. I don't like splitting the difference like that as the binary choices are designed to be binary.
 
[X] Deny the warlocks' aid.

Grok may not know it but he does need to cut his strings with the Leigon lest his blade be wasted on allies, I think.
 
Back
Top