Should I say anything about the PRT's pre-Ellisburg success rate? Or is that going to get ignored too?
First, I want to make it clear that I'm not trying to start or continue an argument. From the tone of your last response to me, I got the impression that's what you were thinking. I'm just stating my opinions. Whether you or anyone else agrees or not is your decision, and I don't have a problem either way.
If the PRT had few successes early on, I don't have a problem with that. Hell, I
expect it. You have a new kind of threat that requires new tactics and new training. Would it take some time before the PRT worked out all the kinks? Sure. What I have a problem with is what at the very least seems like a general attitude throughout the story that it doesn't matter what regular humans do or what they try, they have no influence whatsoever and that the only people whose actions really matter are parahumans'. I literally
cheered when the Dragon's Teeth showed up on screen, and was then disappointed when the one thing they actually did was, IIRC, kill Jack. Which, admittedly, was immensely satisfying, but still does little to change the prevailing attitude of the story.
So yes, like Firedon said, it wasn't that the PRT failed in Ellisburg I had an issue with. It was that the response, both in character and out, was not "Well, that didn't work. Let's figure out what went wrong so this doesn't happen again" and instead was "Well, that didn't work. Clearly we are worthless dogs who will be sacrificed on the altar of parahuman greatness". And I'm exaggerating that to make a point, but looking back on the story as a whole, that kind of attitude is one of the big things I wasn't fond of.
The fact that Wildbow later went on to talk about how single capes would wipe out entire teams when forced in a corner, despite the fact many of the powers that were actually demonstrated don't seem to have that kind of lethality, is another but related topic. Are there capes who are that dangerous? Sure, I'm not arguing that at all. We see some on-screen, in fact. It's the idea that it seems, at least to me, to be something that is meant to be generalized to
all capes when that doesn't fit what we see of the characters in the story itself that I disagree with. I don't see how most of the capes in Brockton Bay would be able to slaughter whole teams of prepared soldiers, for instance, and definitely not without getting killed in the crossfire. That might be one of those "your mileage may vary" things, I don't know, but it's still something that got under my skin. Clearly.
So, to sum up, what I disliked was what I saw as a general theme that if a character didn't have powers, they were worthless and hopeless. That's what irked me about the "cops and robbers" thing when applied to basically any of the gangs in BB, whose actions were said and implied to hurt probably hundreds or thousands of people. The idea that hurting or even killing ordinary people was treated like a game was just…. Yeah. It pissed me off.
Right, sorry. Katsuragi's post a short ways above sums up how I feel about the whole 'No Wildbow WOG' attitude.
Like I said before, Wildbow's philosophy, or at least what he put in Worm, and my personal beliefs are pretty diametrically opposed. If I accepted every WoG he put out, I would rapidly lose my enjoyment of what I did like about Worm and, more importantly to me, my enjoyment of the Worm fandom. So yes, I do ignore a lot of what he says for my own peace of mind.
I probably phrased that more flippantly or aggressively than was necessary, though. It wouldn't be the first time.
Of course, I also stand by what I said about treating the source material as canon and any WoG as a way distant secondary supplement that can be ignored. That isn't specific to Worm, mind; I have that attitude towards
any story with lots of WoG. Part of that is because I feel that a book or show should be able to stand on its own, part of it is that it gives me as a fanfic writer more latitude to come up with new ideas, and part of it is laziness so I don't have to track down and integrate the actual author's statements.
Now, onto lighter subjects….
That's kind of where I was going with my "Delay the damage" idea above, but that's mostly because... well, what happens to all that damage that occurred in the past? It sounds like either the Bounded Field is left floating there forever, like something from Grey Boy that got shunted side-ways spatially, or that the damage should have been retconned into existence... which kind of fits with the canon explanation as well come to think of it.
Main question is what happens to that damage?
I think that pocket of "past" would snap back to the past or, probably more likely, would collapse into Imaginary Space. It might also help to realize that I'm not thinking of "damage" as a measurable quantity that needs to be accounted for; it's just the rearrangement of matter, so what does it matter (
) if a wall is in one piece over here or in lots of pieces there and there and there and there and… you get the idea. I guess it's the idea that "damage" has to be transferred somewhere else at all that I find so strange.
if that's true then where are the Langoliers
Or what's in the barrier goes to feed them when mages are done with it. Seriously, kitsune, you get a like just for the Stephen King reference.