Mate, we dropped from Low to Very Low on temp econ------------------(18) drain between 1970 AG and 1990 AG. I consider it very unlikely that we'll drop below Very Low for 2030 AG on a temp econ---------(9) plan.Even if it only gets us to Very Low, that's enough to greatly restrict our options next turn. We don't know how much we'll need next turn and that could bite us very hard. We should get enough temp econ so that no matter what happens, we can afford the solutions without any worries. Best case scenario, nothing happens and we can freely spend as much temp econ as we want without any fear of crippling our ability to respond to crises.
As for the great restrictions? It basically means we can't afford to Megaproject or Settle without taking Expand Economy to support the action. And the combination of MAIN aqueducts, SEC wall, two trade expeditions and our x6 infrastructure passives should leave us with a lot of happy factions next turn, so I doubt there'd be a lot of issues on that front.
Swapping MAIN Aqueducts to MAIN Farming would be a +5 temp econ swing, but that will probably leave us with the Theocrat and Centralist quests uncompleted at 1 remaining piece of infrastructure next turn, which could lock up two SEC actions on subsequent turns if the other factions continue asking for Walls, Mines and/or Aqueducts.
While true, 1.2 faction power isn't particularly concerning either.The Purists currently don't have the power to make trouble, and giving them what they want when the don't have the ability gives them it. They are not a faction we want to have power.
If we want to worry about the smaller factions? I'd be more concerned about the Isolationists quietly pushing for us to avoid further interaction with the Caradysh Empire. Because we don't particularly like the Caradysh or their vassals anyway.