- Location
- Canada
One of my former colleagues (now retired) began his career painting the inside of submarine ballast tanks. Implications spectacularly disturbing.
He's a surfactant-secreting epithelial cell in a submarine girl's lungs.
One of my former colleagues (now retired) began his career painting the inside of submarine ballast tanks. Implications spectacularly disturbing.
To be fair, you'd be painting them for rust prevention, not decoration. But still...While I don't know Halsey that well, how is that different form his usual self? By any account he had little patience for fools.
One of my former colleagues (now retired) began his career painting the inside of submarine ballast tanks. Implications spectacularly disturbing.
Those tanks are big man, and require regular repainting.You'd hope the inside of ballast tanks isn't a place that's visited often enough to warrant decorating it.
Either way, that guy is understandably not claustrophobic at all.
Yeah really.Those tanks are big man, and require regular repainting.
Salt water is a bitch and a half.
Well, I know where Sink the Shigure got its party trick from, if that's true.Didn't the IJN try to drag a fleetboat to the surface once with a chain?
The price tag actually wouldn't be too bad, The tanks are meant to handle depth of upwards of 1000 meters down, so outside of needing some buffing and repainting, its mostly man hours and dock use for cost.Yeah really.
There is a very well known incident from around '93 - '94, out at the Bangor sub base, where after a refit/maintenance cycle, one of the Ohios went for its submerged test run, and had to call it off ASAP on the very first dive when they blew the ballast out with compressed air. Due to an extremely loud metallic scraping/crushing sound on her port side bow tanks that freaked the crew into a going from a normal ascent-to-surface, into a near emergency ascent.
Got back in and checked out, and some really poor bastard of a maintenance enlisted had left a ladder in the tank. When they submerged and filled the tank, they didn't hear it shifting from the inflow of watet. But when they re-pressurized it with air, it made one hell of a mess to the inside of the tank, while getting twisted up like a petzel. IIRC the remains of the ladder (whatever is left that is) are kept at the engineering offices as a none-to-subtle reminder of fucking up is NOT an option if you want to keep your stripes. As they were quite easily able to see the number on the ladder, and compare it to which maintenance shift was last using it (signing out everything, yo) and who hadn't signed it back in, but fudged and 'replaced with new', without checking WHERE the old one might have gone.
Personally, I really REALLY don't want to know the damage bill to the tank for that incident. Because six figures is probably lowballing it badly.
Yes, its the same incident that Down Periscope referenced.
-=-
The other Bangor 'incident', about the illegal seine-fishing/drag-net trawler out in the Strait of Juan de Fuca dropping it net and a Los Angeles getting it tangled around its mast, where it then dragging the trawler for miles before figuring out what happened? That one has been repeatedly confirmed as utter bullshit, spread as a base joke to troll civvies.
Don't be so certain about that. Ohios are well known for having their 'silent running' gear on damn near everything inside the hull, and outside it too. I wouldn't doubt for a moment if the ladder didn't rip something up internally that could have negatively impacted her 'hole in the water' status.The price tag actually wouldn't be too bad, The tanks are meant to handle depth of upwards of 1000 meters down, so outside of needing some buffing and repainting, its mostly man hours and dock use for cost.
Yeah really.
There is a very well known incident from around '93 - '94, out at the Bangor sub base, where after a refit/maintenance cycle, one of the Ohios went for its submerged test run, and had to call it off ASAP on the very first dive when they blew the ballast out with compressed air. Due to an extremely loud metallic scraping/crushing sound on her port side bow tanks that freaked the crew into a going from a normal ascent-to-surface, into a near emergency ascent.
Got back in and checked out, and some really poor bastard of a maintenance enlisted had left a ladder in the tank. When they submerged and filled the tank, they didn't hear it shifting from the inflow of watet. But when they re-pressurized it with air, it made one hell of a mess to the inside of the tank, while getting twisted up like a petzel. IIRC the remains of the ladder (whatever is left that is) are kept at the engineering offices as a none-to-subtle reminder of fucking up is NOT an option if you want to keep your stripes. As they were quite easily able to see the number on the ladder, and compare it to which maintenance shift was last using it (signing out everything, yo) and who hadn't signed it back in, but fudged and 'replaced with new', without checking WHERE the old one might have gone.
Personally, I really REALLY don't want to know the damage bill to the tank for that incident. Because six figures is probably lowballing it badly.
Yes, its the same incident that Down Periscope referenced.
-=-
The other Bangor 'incident', about the illegal seine-fishing/drag-net trawler out in the Strait of Juan de Fuca dropping it net and a Los Angeles getting it tangled around its mast, where it then dragging the trawler for miles before figuring out what happened? That one has been repeatedly confirmed as utter bullshit, spread as a base joke to troll civvies.
Well, if used at sea, they'd be all but unstoppable, as no naval artillery would be likely to hit them. On land, anything cruiser weight and above would be immune to most battlefield weapons.Curiously, has anyone wonder about how the Allies and the Axis powers are going to use their summoned shipgirls in combat? Has Sky made any comments regarding this? Will summoned shipgirls be used on land? If so how would they be used on land?
A little early to speculate on this imo, since Utah just rage-summoned herself after all.Curiously, has anyone wonder about how the Allies and the Axis powers are going to use their summoned shipgirls in combat? Has Sky made any comments regarding this? Will summoned shipgirls be used on land? If so how would they be used on land?
On land, I would imagine it would be almost impossible to harm a shipgirl with regular antitank weapons. Maybe if you have some naval guns as makeshift anti-shipgirl weapons.Well, if used at sea, they'd be all but unstoppable, as no naval artillery would be likely to hit them. On land, anything cruiser weight and above would be immune to most battlefield weapons.
most ship girls not Battleship class have anywhere between 3-5 inches of armor or less, well within the range of most tank gun/ tank guns.On land, I would imagine it would be almost impossible to harm a shipgirl with regular antitank weapons. Maybe if you have some naval guns as makeshift anti-shipgirl weapons.
Perhaps land combat for shipgirls would be like the Mass Effect/Kantai Collection crossover?
Crossover - Sci-Fi - Ad Astra per Aspera (A Kantai Collection/Mass Effect Quest; No Shepard, you are the spaceship)
That is true but ships are much bigger than a tank. If the shipgirls have something like the shipgirl effect, it is going to take more than an antitank gun to bring one down.most ship girls not Battleship class have anywhere between 3-5 inches of armor or less, well within the range of most tank gun/ tank guns.
Most likely all clothing that was not manifested for shipgirls would have to be uniquely tailored for each ship.I think a question that should be asked is if we'll see some of the MSSB effects occur. Like trying to get something tailor made for Utah.
Oh the poor tailor who goes through that. I feel sorry for thee.
Too low. I think they should start as sergeant since it is their ship body that went to war and at least they have experience because of it. Or even a lieutenant. As a matter of fact there shouldn't be a fixed starting rank and instead they should be ranked by their exploits for better cohesion.Be something if the USN decided to give Utah an honorary commission. I created a scale for rank for the shipgirls:
BB/CV/CVL/CVE/CVS/AV - Initial rank is Midshipman
CB/CC/CA/CL - Intial rank is Petty Officer 3rd Class
DD/DE/SS & Auxiliaries - Initial rank is Seaman Recruit
AR - Initial rank is Ensign (Naval Engineer)
AH - Initial rank is Lieutenant (Naval Medical Corps)
Based on this chart, Utah's rank would be backdated to her commission date (31 August 1911). Regular promotions from then on would put her as a Captain with 3 years' seniority at the time of Pearl Harbor. (Not to mention this would negate any problems with her possibly getting involved with her last CO whom - I think we can agree - has a soft spot for her.)
Wrong branch you're thinking of there, that rank doesn't exist in the Navy.
I personally think it is somewhat comparable to sexual slavery.