Changing Destiny (Kancolle)

except that would change nothing. MSSB can do a lot of things, but turning a human rifle into an AT gun isn't one of them, and the girls would likely make piss poor infantry given their complete lack of training.

Wait, do the girls have their riggings with them? I was assuming that they did and could rain down death while dug in in a bunker.
 
Wait, do the girls have their riggings with them? I was assuming that they did and could rain down death while dug in in a bunker.
except the distance is effectively to short for their guns to work, and if you notice most of the Artillery batteries in Normandy you'll realize that their both far from the front lines and were either primary targets for the big guns or airborne units.
 
except the distance is effectively to short for their guns to work, and if you notice most of the Artillery batteries in Normandy you'll realize that their both far from the front lines and were either primary targets for the big guns or airborne units.

I doubt that artillery could hit them very well, airborne attack on the other hand... you know, the image of a shipgirl defeated by a person that is lighter than them by a magnitude is an amusing thought
 
And you are making the assumption that KM shipgirls will fight on the Nazi side... based on what we've seen so far that is *not* a good assumption to make.
 
You know what that comment meant ;) . But sure the girls can't do anything on the sea... but what if they are on the beaches themselves. That would be a bloodbath...

Honestly, probably they would have a limited impact. You are assuming that they would know where the Allies are invading, the Allies wouldn't figure out that Schreiber is a time traveler so knows and changes the plan to a different area, the girls are on land and can summon their rigging to fight effectively there, the girls WANT to fight (a fact very much not in evidence) and even then there are obvious countermeasures. Like the fact that the USN/RN will have a lot more naval firepower available being directed by their own MSSB, plus the issue of airpower. While an Admiral Hipper can wreck a tank, the USS Nevada or HMS Queen Elizabeth for two can absolutely wreck the Hipper.

I doubt that artillery could hit them very well, airborne attack on the other hand... you know, the image of a shipgirl defeated by a person that is lighter than them by a magnitude is an amusing thought

If it's the 'girl'...sure. If it's the 'ship'...well that's a big and immobile target for the USN and RN BBs to pulverize.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, probably they would have a limited impact. You are assuming that they would know where the Allies are invading, the Allies wouldn't figure out that Schreiber is a time traveler so knows and changes the plan to a different area, the girls are on land and can summon their rigging to fight effectively there, the girls WANT to fight (a fact very much not in evidence) and even then there are obvious countermeasures.
If it's the 'girl'...sure. If it's the 'ship'...well that's a big and immobile target for the USN and RN BBs to pulverize.

Wait a sec, I thought we were just talking about a what if scenario, not a will it actually happen discussion. Well, now we got that cleared up.

Actually I just got a thought, if a film producer needed a quick stand in for a shipgirl, lets say oh.... Hood, which USN shipgirl would be the best stand in?
 
Hood, which USN shipgirl would be the best stand in?
I don't know which US shipgirls, but RN could use the Queen Elizabeth battleships, if they have them kitted out before they received their 'castle bridge' refits.

Hood

Queen Elizabeth, circa 1915. (sorry for the small size. It's the only resolution I could find)
 
[X] Italy

Because I really want to know why Andrea Doria would be in Malta.

An early armistice (possibly due to a time-traveler interfering) would probably have been mentioned or foreshadowed. A conquest of Malta in 1941-42... could maybe have been possible if the Germans hadn't launched Barbarossa. And It's too early for Operations Harpoon, Vigorous and Pedestal. Uhm...

Sad thing is, I could quite easily make my own botegirl fandom (ala Sea Queens) if we're actually inclined to do it. I've got enough original stuff scattered in my KC fics.

I would support this. Seriously, one of the things I genuinely dislike about this fandom is the expectation that any fanfic should conform to the same old tropes, clichés and jokes.
 
Last edited:
[X] France

Because I just did a little light reading on french politics during WW2, and wow. That topic is an abyss of intrigue and mistrust that defies summary.

Anyways, I've been rereading this fic for a while now and something just occurred to me: It's practically a guarantee that Admiral Lutgens' and Giesenau's conversations are being monitored by British intelligence. When the bombshell that "Sascha" is a german pocket battleship drops it's going to look like someone kicked an anthill, especially if the people in charge there aren't briefed on the shipgirl situation.
 
When the bombshell that "Sascha" is a german pocket battleship drops it's going to look like someone kicked an anthill, especially if the people in charge there aren't briefed on the shipgirl situation.

I'm pretty sure knowing there's a battleship walking around the base in human size is great incentive to not do anything overly stupid near her lest you discover that she can manifest her whole weight (crush buildings) or any fraction of her armament.
 
I'm pretty sure knowing there's a battleship walking around the base in human size is great incentive to not do anything overly stupid near her lest you discover that she can manifest her whole weight (crush buildings) or any fraction of her armament.

True, but there will also be frantic research on how to get shipgirls of their own...
 
Anyways, I've been rereading this fic for a while now and something just occurred to me: It's practically a guarantee that Admiral Lutgens' and Giesenau's conversations are being monitored by British intelligence. When the bombshell that "Sascha" is a german pocket battleship drops it's going to look like someone kicked an anthill, especially if the people in charge there aren't briefed on the shipgirl situation.

Remember that as per WOG, these are from down the road.

To at least make up for that a little, have some snippets from future chapters.

That said, it's pretty much a given that after Hood visibly manifested herself, the news was sent to the Admiralty and Churchill by her captain. Now whether or not it percolated from there down to the intelligence folks watching Gniesenau and Lutjens before she revealed who she really is, is anyone's guess. As well, pre-Pearl, the examples of shipgirls are all stuck to their hull, so there may not be the conceptual leap of 'ship sunk means the spirit is not destroyed, but freed to come on shore and interact with humans' outside our time travelers. Even after Pearl, the information that Utah was able to do so may or may not be shared with the British (it probably will, especially since by November 1941, the Royal Navy has a LOT of sunk ships).

True, but there will also be frantic research on how to get shipgirls of their own...

That's a given once the news about Hood's manifestation reaches London. I suspect more accurately there would be research to perceive the ones wandering around their hulls for the obvious benefits to the captain. Once the bombshell that sunk ships can rise again hits, though....

Yeah, they'll call Churchill, who will tell them "Good, the Kriegsmarine hates Hitler more than it hates us. Be friendly." which will get a bunch of them at MI5 to shit themselves over how the PM already knows.

Well they should know that from Bismark's message to Revenge after she crippled her. Gneisenau getting messages from her sister is just further confirmation of the anti-Nazi conspiracy, and a good way to establish a secret communication channel with Schreiber.
 
Last edited:
I find it appropriate that Queen Elizabeth is the one raising objections, since she was one of three of the Royal Navy's battleships to be in active shape at the end of the war - and she was on her way out at the time. The rest were either sunk, transferred, or out of service with a laundry list of issues.
 
I find it appropriate that Queen Elizabeth is the one raising objections, since she was one of three of the Royal Navy's battleships to be in active shape at the end of the war - and she was on her way out at the time. The rest were either sunk, transferred, or out of service with a laundry list of issues.

...I don't think Churchill was a very good Sea Lord...
 
...I don't think Churchill was a very good Sea Lord...
Well... He did mess up one transportation trip to provide russia with supplies and equipments....

But the main contributer is that it was due to miscommunication and lack of information during the disaster...
 
I find it appropriate that Queen Elizabeth is the one raising objections, since she was one of three of the Royal Navy's battleships to be in active shape at the end of the war - and she was on her way out at the time. The rest were either sunk, transferred, or out of service with a laundry list of issues.

I can imagine the RAN shipgirls would have issues as well. While they weren't there, all Australians have LONG memories of "those damned Dardanelles"
 
Last edited:
...I don't think Churchill was a very good Sea Lord...

Which time?

1911-1915 he was pretty good. Supervised the changeover from oil to coal coal to oil power in capital ships and pushed through the Queen Elizabeths. Admittedly Gallipoli was a disaster and he had to resign over it, since he was the most visible proponent of it. That said, he did well in getting the RN ready for WWI and was instrumental in the development of the tank, so I'd grade him passing personally.

EDIT-Reading comprehension FTW. Good catch everyone.

September 1939-June 1940 he got hamstrung by Chamberlain over protecting Norway and was unable to move the fleet into Norwegian waters to smash the German invasion. Not his fault there. Also when he got back in the office, the war had broken out so his ability to modernize and refurbish the RN was pretty much secondary to the need for warships to be on station rather than in drydock.

I can imagine the RAN shipgirls would have issues as well. While they weren't there, all Australians have LONG memories of "those damned Dardanelles"

True, Gallipoli was one of his biggest failures (along with Singapore falling in 1942). His errors there were more about not getting the right people to spearhead the operation, though.
 
Last edited:
Which time?

1911-1915 he was pretty good. Supervised the changeover from oil to coal power in capital ships and pushed throught he Queen Elizabeths. Admittedly Gallipoli was a disaster and he had to resign over it, since he was the most visible proponent of it. That said, he did well in getting the RN ready for WWI and was instrumental int he development of the tank, so I'd grade him passing personally.

September 1939-June1940 he got hamstrung by Chamberlain over protecting Norway and was unable to move the fleet into Norwegian Waters to smash the German invasion. Not his fault there. also when he got back int he office, the war had broken out so his ability to modernize and refurbish the RN was pretty much secondary to the need for warships to be on station rather than in drydock.

Might want to flip oil and coal.
 
Churchill knew who he wanted to lead the Gallipoli campaign, but he had no say over that because the Army selected operational leaders by seniority. Which led to Sir Francis Stopford getting the job and making an utter hash of a surprise landing. By the time the right general got selected to take over, the trenches had already been dug and it was just a matter of managing the withdrawal.

On the Army side, Churchill's friend and mentor Lord Kitchener was the author of many a disaster nearly as bad as Gallipoli.
 
Would have updated, but less than fun day.

So I'm playing around with new retro controllers (N64 and Gamecube) for my emulators instead. Will work more tomorrow. If I can fend my muse off from wanting to do an ABDA spin-off.
 
Back
Top