Attempting to Fulfill the Plan MNKh Edition

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
The amount of qualifiers packed into the description of our tanks are concerning. On the other hand the whole of our European subject states did not burn down so we got a win there.
 
Caspian Sea Petrochemical Extraction(Stage 1/2):
Samotor Field Development(Stage 1/3):
Consumer Goods Production Grants(Stage 1/3):

In past turns projects marked as having at least High Profitability gave increased Resources, so why not during these results?

EDIT: This has been fixed.
 
Last edited:
So it's time for more military news.

Next-generation rifle trials have been started to in one part lower the average load of the soldier while carrying an adequate number of rounds and to increase the precision of fire when conducting assault action. A move to a lighter cartridge has been universally agreed upon by every bureau as it is expected that the AKM and its ammunition will be retired before 1980. Actual geometries of the new round are still a partially open question with efforts centered around significantly extending base zero ballistics, effectively extending the range of engagement. Further work on the modernization of the Makarov has proceeded with the integration of an advanced polymer body and a wider magazine allowing for the feed of twelve rounds without a significant gain in weight.
Work on new rifle continue. Nothing really interesting outside of potentiallly phasing out AKM and not doing development for it.

The need for a new Uniform has been pressing due to considerable global advancements in polymers and fibers. Incorporating some synthetic elements and ensuring a far more durable base outfit a new series of uniforms is expected to be issued. The summer uniform comprises a basic buttoned jacket and pants, lightened slightly from the previous issue and incorporating a new splotched pattern with better resistance to light amplification. The winter uniform has effectively been issued as a two-layer system of clothes, with a heavy outer jacket matched with a heavier set of pants to be put directly over a non-camouflaged inner layer. This has been combined with a new issuance of carrying equipment incorporating aluminum lightning and the latest fabrics, providing troops with a significant improvement in capability on the march.

To augment carrying capacities and take the examples of Chinese work towards improving soldier equipment distribution a new frontal carrying system has been issued. Inspired by the type 56 and extending it the new rig incorporates four double magazine pouches for standard AKM magazines along with four smaller auxiliary pockets for alternative equipment. Issuances have been prioritized for assault, airborne, and marine units as they are expected to receive the most benefits from such a setup. The general armed forces themselves are only expected to receive it by 1970 as production increases but it alone offers a significant improvement in load distribution. Some have proposed variations for alternative squad roles, but the limitations of frontal carrying capacity strongly limit what additional equipment can be packed on.
New uniforms and other items related to carrying stuff. As important as they are unexciting and will make our army better.

To improve squad-level anti-tank firepower, a new light anti-tank system has entered service with a 70mm cumulative warhead. The light three kg RPG-18 is expected to enter service in any area where there exists a significant risk of enemy armored vehicles. By distributing out light anti-tank firepower for close-in fighting, urban combat against enemy armor can be made significantly easier. The light launcher effectively only has a use-able range of 150m, but given the availability of other anti-tank firepower that should be adequate. In areas without the strong expectation of armor, the rocket system can be deployed in a far more limited manner to ensure that every squad has at least an option against enemy armor.
Unguided rocket launcher for anti tank duty, as noted wide adoption and deployment will increase unit combat capability and make tank use by our enemies more dangerous for them. Good news but nothing to add.
Lower-level anti-aircraft firepower has been further enhanced by the standard issuance of portable anti-aircraft systems on the battalion level. The new missile system is entirely man-portable and features a significantly improved nitrogen-cooled seeker system. Front-aspect engagements against fast-moving jets are still questionable, with rear-aspect ones problematic due to missile kinetics, but they can now be performed. Further chemistry improvements in the motor itself have extended the range of the next-generation Strela-2 system, allowing it to strike most helicopter targets. Production of the new system also comes right as several examples of the old system have been moved to mass sale, augmenting the capacity of fraternal socialist allies.
Spreading man portable anti air missiles is good for us and good for our allies or clients and represent significant increase of capabilities over limited or no supply of such weapons but it seems to have the same problems as first versions of IRL Strela-2, poor seeker with poor range and potentially weak warhead. Still better for it to be there and wait for improved version like IRL than not to have production going.
The development of heavier anti-armor arms has come two separate parts of a greater armament complex, with lighter systems for more mobile units and a standardized heavy system for mechanized units. Any light and either sea or air mobile unit is expected to carry the 9K111 system with a ten-kilogram missile capable of engaging targets out to one and a half kilometers with a SACLOS guidance system. For mechanized units, the 9K113 has been developed to arm the BMP and provide a massive capacity expansion as an integrated element. The surplus of missiles carried for the vehicles external tubes can be used by the infantry allowing the same munitions to be used for both with a launcher carried in the back. The heavier sixteen-kilogram missile is expected to engage armored targets out to three and a half kilometers.
SACLOS missiles are represent significant improvement in accuracy over their MCLOS predecessors thus offering significant increase in combat power and assuming they are equivalent to IRL missiles they will be very good addition. However 9K111 with 1.5km range is rather shit, this is very bad range for missile in it's weight class offering half the range of IRL 9K14 from early 60s indicating problems with aerodynamics or engine. (I think 2-2,5km range would be more reasonble rising it from bad to okay).
Of another note is development of what looks like container launchers allowing missile to be stored in it's launch tube to be attached to control system be it vehicle mounted or carried by infantry.
Total modernization and mechanization of the ground forces have proven to be a far more complicated task than initially expected. Limited internal volume and testing with the commander dismounted have demonstrated significant limitations in the ability of the turret-mounted gunner to independently spot enemies. Work around the limitations of having two crew on the vehicle that does not dismount is expected to be problematic but should be compensated for by the commander being able to direct fire externally. The ATGM complex itself has had few technical issues and the gun is functional if unexceptional. Protection across the frontal arc has been judged as more than adequate against heavy machine guns while protection on the side is enough to repel armor-piercing rifle fire. Amphibious crossings by the vehicle remain challenging, but can still be done under moderately windy conditions.
Total mechanisation of armed forces is complicated and extremely expensive, even full mechanisation of combat elements is complicated and expensive so issues are expected, especially since our platform is not ideal. MTLB equivalent is required to proceed.
Otherwise better armed BMP-1 continue to be better armed BMP-1 and facing similar problems. It's good, it's useful but it'll need improvements soonish.

Problems with the T64A have been partially resolved as more advanced production techniques and front-line reports have reached the factories. The initially over-complicated engine has been made adequately reliable with the next-generation gearbox mostly not problematic relative to expected lifespans. The suspension of the tank has given several problems but they have been mostly fixed. Improved internals have allowed the gunner to control the suspension, lowering the tank against any target that necessitates further lowering or raising. New production models remain problematic with several parts consistently recalled for factory overhaul, but half a decade of work has made it mostly acceptable. New bids for a further generation of tanks that can unify the two designs and work towards the retirement of the T52 have been placed even if they are not expected to be in production any time soon.
Early production problems are being solved on T-64 as is natural part of tanks life cycle.

Modernization of towed guns started with a decisive push to get rid of older guns made in the immediate aftermath of the war. To replace all heavy artillery pieces with a new standard system a single combined long-range 152mm gun has entered the design phase with continued work on both lightening and range optimization. Consolidation of lighter guns has been planned to work around the 122mm gun with improvements made to the older D-30 design. Both improved guns and work on them are expected to be fit to a tracked chassis once completed, improving the capacity for mobile fires.
New SPGs development and gun unification,first is expected and if it follow IRL development will deliver good vehicle capable of doing it's job, second is needed cost cutting measure that is actually going to make army more capable by simplyfing logistics and going for what should be most capable guns.

The first flights and issuance of the Mig-23 have been pushed forward to combat the mass issuance of the American F4 to several nations along with the growing sophistication of American air-power. Training units have received the plane first with good views of it, the intake AoA issues have yet to be entirely solved but it can easily significantly exceed the turning performance of anything before it. The radar system itself has several limitations due to its rushed nature but future planes are practically expected to receive a full electronics reconfiguration once supplies are adequate. Initial training units equipped with the plane have started to test its performance in radar-exclusive combat, launching ordinance without a direct visual.

For close-in maneuvers, IRST systems along with enhanced acquisition modes have been incorporated and synchronized to missile seekers to greatly increase capability in close ranges. The radar display integration with the main display is still simpler than expected but judged as adequate. Counter-tactics for fighting the plane have indicated that an improved warning of radar acquisition is necessary for adequate evasion but the system is only expected to be fit with avionics overhauls. The Mig-23K effectively gains half a ton in weight for a hardier airframe capable of performing carrier launches. Both variations can technically carry the next generation of light anti-shipping missiles on all four inner towers, but it is not expected to be necessary in a fighter or interceptor role.
MiG-23 is finished early but not with all of intended features (radar), otherwise it seem to include all of improvement IRL plane offered, the not really heads up dispaly, IRST system (not present on IRL early production run), integration of IRST with radar and missile systems, and some improvements over IRL version like ability to carry really heavy missiles on inner pylons. Intake issues are likely to be solved soon for new production model of papered over by limiting AoA in normal operations.
Naval version is notable by existing, it was proposed IRL and not made.

Every Mig-25 is almost double the price of the Mig-23 with an even greater cost coming from its missile system. Despite being developed on an older electronics basis its radar system is the most powerful ever flown, capable of tracking sixteen targets and guiding four separate missiles simultaneously. The capability to operate in a pulse doppler mode against low-altitude bombers has also been pushed forward, significantly improving capabilities. The radar itself is likely to be replaced once better electronics are available, but current models are considered more than adequate. Test pilots have further flown the plane with far heavier than designed loads showing some promise for use as a tactical missile carrier on the inner pylons. Despite starting production, technical improvements are still expected as the temperamental AL-21 engines are fuel-hungry and maintenance-heavy.
To the best of my knowledge that is very good radar, like very good radar especially for something that see service in 1968. PD mode (that alone means our aerial radars are better than what IRL USSR fielded at the time), Track While Scan that can keep information on significant number of targets alone would make it extremely good radar, potentially offering us limited technological advantage over US systems but then it goes above expectation and is able to guide 4 separate Semi Active Radar missile to target, seems to be equivalent (a bit better) to Zaslon radar that USSR developed in late 70s. This should be better than any radar US is fielding on their interceptors and should remain so for few more years until F-14 see deployment around '72.

With the general success and good reception of the Mig-25, its less revolutionary backup in the form of the Tu-148 has been canceled. This has come with the transfer of focus of the Tupolev bureau to the new Tu-26. The swing wing modification of the Tu-22 has technically been designed as a stopgap system while work on the far more ambitious next-generation bomber is underway. Current capabilities expect the mounting of three Kh-22 missiles with one carried internally in strike configurations, allowing the bomber to easily engage enemy fleet elements and act as a tactical platform. Technical development of the next generation of the ordinance has already been started to replace the Kh-22 in all roles by improving guidance and significantly accelerating diving-approach speed.
Low tech plane canceled since high tech project paid off and spread of AShM to bombers. Good thinhs in general.
The just entering-into-service Su-17 program has produced mixed results as even with the swung wing subsonic performance is far from expectations while compatibility with precision ordinance is limited. The airframe is still a significant improvement over the Su-7 and it is expected that enough will be produced to fully utilize leftover production capacity for the Al-7 engine, with production retired afterward. The much more ambitious Su-24 program has received the majority of attention with improvements in wing geometry borrowed from both the Tu-144 and Mig-23. Further improvements in the design have moved towards a single-cranked delta without either a tail or canards. This has allowed for a reduction of drag in low-altitude penetration missions, improving performance. The nose system is expected to mount an integrated electro-optical laser device to allow for the independent guidance of ordinance by the copilot, massively extending ordinance efficiency.
Su-17 is as it was, swing wing Su-7. Depending on how well modernisation go it may keep going for long time, at the same time assuming our Su-7 is like IRL Su-7, Su-17 may see quite a success in export, there are many people who would be interested in relatively capable and reliable plane with some modernisation potential.

With the sheer expense and technical nature of the Mig-25, there has been some debate on its role as an interceptor. The continuation of development on the already mature Su-15 airframe has enabled a significant capacity extension on the new Su-15Bis platform, with new engines, missiles, and avionics. Newly developed R-25 engines are expected to be paired with a radar system directly derived from the Mig-25. Furthermore, cockpit electronics have been updated to newer versions, capable of working as either a directed system or independently in interception work. The improved wing is expected to improve the plane's range while cruising significantly while also enabling a far higher emergency after-burn in case of emergency. Further, the increased carrying capacity will allow for the mounting of four R40s along with a drop tank in standard configuration extending operational and intercept ranges.
Attempts at cost cutting by modernising older airframe to do the job or attempt to cheaply expand capabilities. It's not bad program.

The actual R-40 system has proven problematic as initial assessments and evaluations for the use of a dual seeker have proven to be beyond technical capabilities. This has effectively produced two variations on the missile itself, one with a thermal seeker and one with a radar seeker. The former is thoroughly disappointing, as the engagement ranges practically require a rear profile launch at closer ranges than the missile would be capable of. The radar seeker itself paired with modern radar systems works far better, with mixed modes significantly narrowing the ability for enemy evasion. On a lighter scale, the R-13 missile has also benefited from similar improvements in development with a model made with a thermal seeker and one with a radar seeker. Limitations in thermal seeker design still significantly limit shots outside the rear aspect for both systems, but unlike with lighter ordinances, they can be done.
So no dual seeker for R-40, that was expected.
Still it seems that we have rolled really bad for IR seekers for both R-40 and R-13 (equivalent to IRL R-40 and R-23s, both are ready early though R-40 by ~2-3 years and R-23 by over 5) but that may just be because both are early or because our radars and radar seekers are much better than IRL. IRL R-40T had good enough IR seeker to be used at long range in front aspect engagement and augment R-40R when launched in pair (T version first to avoid it locking on the R version), similarly IRL R-23T had good enough seeker to be useful in medium range engagement even from frontal hemisphere.
Continued improvement in the R3M has forced the development of a new missile system, both to fit into lighter wingtip mounts on modernized air-frames and to provide additional maneuver capability to better complement heavier systems. A new generation light sixty-kilogram system has been designed with a more consistent nitrogen-cooled seeker along with a massive increase in maneuverability. Some range tradeoffs have been made, but those ranges are expected to be covered by lighter the R13 for front-line combat aircraft. The low weight of the system itself has not allowed for a heavier seeker capable of combat-relevant front aspect shots to be mounted, but the seeker itself promises to massively improve the accuracy of side-aspect shots conducted from close ranges. Further work on the missile system is still expected as once more advanced seekers can be miniaturized true front aspect capability can be achieved.
New light missile development was expected if not yet, the new missile seem to be going towards being R-60 equivalent, light, highly maneauverable dogfighting missile. The cooled seeker should be better than uncooled one on early R-60.
Now if it's already deployed then it's a bit early which is always nice and if it's not it still have chance to arrive on time. There also seem to be no lower tech missile in development to provide low cost alternative.
To pair with the new bid a new complex of anti-shipping missiles has started development to massively extend the capabilities of the Kh-22. Improved radar guidance, stronger systems, and significantly increased speed on both the attack and cruise can be developed as an essential part of new strike packages. The liquid-fueled stage will have to be maintained but a far more advanced engine can be taken from developments in the space program. Tentative synchronization of the missile to commands over-satellite has been proposed but is considered technically challenging for now. The missile itself is expected to be more compact in bays and come in at a lighter five tons, providing a target for the bomber program to meet. Tupolev is likely to be the winner in the bid due to their greater experience in bomber airframes, but the question is technically an open one.
Further development of AShM will let us better protect our coasts and put further limitations on US power projection ability, we also see benefits from space program influencing weapon development.
 
The last year has seen unrest flare across Poland, Germany, and Austria as fuel prices fluctuated leading to significant drives in inflationary indices across the countries. Misguided worker protests in Poland were rapidly dealt with by local security forces with few issues as the peaceful marches could be safely ignored with the loudest agitators removed. Austrian instability was comparatively harder to contain as the movement started with a degree of violence from the outset, leaving it easy to discredit but problematic to contain in the immediate phase. Security advisors and a surplus of policing forces managed to contain and draw it out but it represents a concerning source of instability. Germany for its part effectively ignored the few complaints and allowed them to pass, with the government now taking credit for reducing fuel prices.
Glad things didn't escalate to complete violence and most protesting was peaceful.
The program itself is expected to continue as a large jobs program, increasing employment while building yet more useless roads.
Hadn't realized the train-viet had infected America LOL
BAZ-4280 A Revolution in Transportation: A new medium van and pickup have been released from the new Bryansk plant, bringing in the best features from all previous automotive designs. A lightweight 2.4L engine lets the vehicle reach more than one hundred and fifty kilometers per hour using the most advanced gearbox yet developed with both a four and five-gear version for sale. Cargo loadings have significantly increased from all previous light truck designs with the suspension of both models capable of transporting two tons on a reasonable paved surface. Handling is good even fully loaded, owing to the 4x4 transmission and the newest tires. -Pionerskaya Pravda
I wanna know what it looks like :cry: :cry: :cry:

I wanna see quirky soviet cars and their weirdnesses
I want Gorby, because he's Gorby.
Big Fat Mood. Bro got handed a empire that hadn't realized it had died yet. Whether the USSR was truly salvageable by the time he become the head honcho is debatable (a smaller union of mostly central asian and Russia could have continued perhaps), Gorby certainly gave it a good old college try.
 
[]Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev: An MSU graduate who rose in the legal service with the massive expansion of public trials, presiding over several cases in the Saratov legal circuit. He has a degree of experience in working for general legal programs involved with case law along with a sufficient degree of party backing. Moving Gorbachev will involve necessary movements towards reforming the legal system as he is convinced that it has areas of unfairness towards those without the ability to hire good representation. The previous expansion of the legal program has proven popular and a judge of a regional circuit should have the base managerial experience to ease into a ministry post.
The only way we can make up for our sins for promoting Romanov into being head of the conservative faction is by promoting Gorby also
 
[]Alexander Fedorovich Kamenev: Rising in prominence from being tracked with directing a wide stretch of road projects in unconventional areas, Kamenev has proven himself adept at the task. He represents one of the few outspoken advocates for the modernization of construction techniques along with increased deployments of heavy machinery to aid in construction. He has proven at least capable of directing large-scale distributed construction projects and can effectively be used towards whatever enlarged housing or roads project is undertaken by the ministry. His excessive youth is going to pose a problem towards an actual succession, but given time and experience that should be overcome. (+2 Infra Actions)

[]Stepan Ivanovich Chistoplyasov: Graduating and defending his candidature in agriculture before large-scale expansions he was immediately tasked with raising grain production in the Altai. Continued work and pioneering improvements through the cultivation of dwarf wheat along with taking advantage of the shorter growing seasons have already yielded considerable results. Chistoplyasov is frankly an over-promoted youth well in over his head but he has managed good results on projects of moderate scale and has a knack for leadership. It's almost guaranteed that he will conflict with the agricultural department, but getting involved in lower-risk politics will provide some experience. (+2 Agricultural Dice)

[]Yuri Nikiforovich Elchenko: A committed politician who was to defend his dissertation in mechanical engineering but was transferred towards the production of more important projects. One of the personnel involved in the automotive industry he has pushed for further improvements in manufacturing and line integration. As his policies have improved production and found some basis in reality this has led to his rapid promotion up the chain. He remains one of the younger candidates for consideration and without much of a technical base, but he can at least be trusted for the construction of new factories. (+2 Heavy Industry Dice)

[]Vladimir Fedorovich Balakirev: Rising from consulting for the technical development of Sverdlovsk, Balakriev has held a significant technical if not notably political post. He graduated as a chemical engineer and immediately moved toward state advisory bodies, providing some experience in higher-level management. Effectively one of the personnel who has pushed the oil industry and significantly developed the local plastic sector his economic contributions are unquestionable. Continued work will almost certainly focus on the stabilization of the petrochemical industry making him a capable candidate for promotion given that the majority of growth is expected to occur in the same region. (+2 LCI Dice this plan, +2 Chemical Industry dice next plan)

[]Nukh Aslancherievich Berzegov: Rapidly pushed through economic schools and defended a dissertation on the previous economic crisis, Berzegov remains the ostensibly most qualified from a theoretical perspective. His managerial expertise remains almost entirely unknown as he is nearly a pure academic who rose through the educational program rather than a political one. His own achievements and direct relevant publications will provide a good flexible advisory basis for policies along with a better high-level approach. Furthermore, by keeping Berzegov in an advisory role he can more readily incorporate into the center improving the odds he can hold onto the ministry. (+1 Free Dice)
People haven't asked the most important question yet: Which of these guys is Russian and who's not?
 
I think it's not too important (too soon for national issues yet imo), but Elchenko is Ukrainian, and Berzegov is a Circassian guy. The rest are Russians.
A Circassian? Cool, a good choice if we care about non-Slavic representation in the ministry.

Amyways, just to confirm: Klimenko retires at the end of the next plan (9th plan), not the current one right? If so than I would not be very worried about lack of management experience from our deputy, since they'll have 5 years (assuming we don't blow anything) to learn on the job.

We COULD go Chistoplyasov + Tatarchuk for Max Rural Focus which would be fun, but I'm not sure it's a good idea. The rural situation isn't that pressing, and ultimately we ARE a major urbanized industrialized power that is also carrying most CMEA's conventional and nuclear military forces on it's back. Taking too much attention away from heavy and chemical industries is not good.

Speaking of HI, remember we're already getting two HI dice in 1969 from our hiring drives a few turns back, so two more (for a total of 12 HI dice before focus) is a relatively marginal benefit especially considering how expensive HI dice are to activate.

FAKE EDIT: Perhaps Chisty + Gorby could work though. Gorby would be a good team with Sokhan, while Chistoplyasov can continue our "worker-peasant alliance" instead of going "sector fixed, time to ignore for the next decade" as @Kirai says. Thank you for the point by point summary of our options, BTW. Helps to not have to read through the thick paragraphs.

Well, just about anything COULD work, really. Question is what works best.

Just so you know MSH, nobody here is fictional, just obscure.
Fascinating. Just where does Blackstar go to find all these characters? I wonder how long it can last before she has to make actual OCs.
Lol, history buffs swooning over popular canon character in game adaptation. :V
ZOMG IS THAT A [insert dubious HOI4 mod here] REFERENCE?!?1? But seriously. After Stalin's and Mikonyan's death detailed the history of Soviet politics, and Voznesensky and Malenkov got yeeted, we're increasingly leaving the big names of OTL behind us so it's a weird feeling seeing someone as well-know as him show up.
Also to clarify, many years will be the next plan aka 5 years. It's time to grow considering Klim's -10 to management will be removed after this plan, but it's not a lot of time.
That would mean he'd be in the chair for 10 years total, which given the term limit is 15 years is a pretty hefty chunk of time. He'll be useful next plan with his malus gone.
 
OK, reactions to various actions:

I noticed the Central Asia road project includes Chelyabinsk and Omsk. Interesting. We probably cocked up by starting both high capacity and regional at the same time. We'll need to throw 7 infra dice at regional next turn for a 50:50 completion chance, no way to finish high capacity at the same time.

Bakchar is 116/200 stage 2, good. Solid completion chance with just two dice and boy do we need that! Given how serious AND GROWING our truck shortages are, we also should go for the Novouralsk truck plant next turn.

[]Full Surveys is tempting but seems a little ambitious. If we don't do it now, when is the next decade such close surveys of the gas giants become viable?

Samotor completed stage 2, giving us an extra - 23 electricity, - 6 petroleum, and +1 general labor. That makes new estimates:
General Labor: 39
Electricity: 324
Petroleum Fuels: 31 (That's a good safety margin, but we need to do more right next turn to ensure prices stay low)
Stage 1 gave -7, stage 2 only -6. I hope such declining rates of return won't be persistent issues.

We're done "solving" the garbage problem and already getting told more work will soon be needed. I'm not surprised but I am frustrated. I wonder if we can just lock in a single services die on auto-landfills for the next decade.

Direct transfers of funding have followed programs for enterprises and businesses to relocate high-employment manufacturing to republics with different wage systems. The lowered expectations for payment and generally lower cost of living have led to a massive degree of internal relocation of enterprises as new plants have preferentially been constructed there.
While relocating manufacturing to low-wage areas is reasonable in theory, when Vozenesensky did that is was a set up for massive exploitation of the workers and I fear the managers will try to do the same thing again here.

Plans have been put forward for the electrification of rail systems and the conversion of several industries towards the utilization of electric power for direct heating. The process itself has been driven by a steady increase in the price of combustibles as even with modernizations in the coal process prices are still expected to increase by almost thirty percent once Western deposits are depleted. The primary goal of the program is a focus on increasing the electrification of industry as it is broadly seen as the lowest bar for significant modernization. Politically the project has become a focused program of improving national sovereignty and control of energy supplies to prevent anything approaching a new energy crisis, setting a near mandate towards energy independence.
This seems like reasonable proposals, I wonder what we're missing out on for the low roll. Just it being rolled out slow with limited enthusiasm? And just how far away is the depletion of the 'western reserves' expected?
 
MNKh Deputies:
- Alexander Fedorovich Kamenev (infra): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Каменев,_Александр_Фёдорович
- Stepan Ivanovich Chistoplyasov (agri): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Чистоплясов,_Степан_Иванович (image included), Perm State Archives
- Yuri Nikiforovich Elchenko (HI): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ельченко,_Юрий_Никифорович
- Vladimir Fedorovich Balakirev (LCI / CI): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Балакирев,_Владимир_Фёдорович (image included)(and yeah I also found that sketchy cold fusion website while digging this guy up)
- Nukh Aslancherievich Berzegov (free dice): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Берзегов,_Нух_Асланчериевич (image included), knowbysight

Services Deputies:
- Alexey Ivanovich Krylov: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Крылов,_Алексей_Иванович (this guy is a goddamn ghost, finding him was a giant pain in the ass)
- Nikolay Fedorovich Tatarchuk: Krasnoyarsk City Portal, http://www.kgau.ru/social/2023/3/content/22.pdf (2nd link is the source for him being a good organizer)
- Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev: we all know who this is lmao
 
Last edited:
I know Gorbachev is famous, obviously, but after sleeping on it I'm not actually sure that legal reform is what the USSR really needs right now. It certainly wouldn't hurt and I'm not like anti-Gorby, maybe if he makes it to full Services secretary he can get us Soviet Pizza Hut, but treating rurals like they're real citizens is probably overall more impactful for more people than legal reform?
 
As for Gorbachev, I highly didn't recommend it. The fact is that during the years when he was the party secretary of the Stavropol Territory, he screwed up. In particular, the number of sheep decreased by 2.5 million heads, which undermined local sheep farming (the reason is the expense of constructing complexes unsuitable for keeping livestock). He survived due to notes and bribes. He also opened the Bolshoi Stavropol Canal ahead of schedule, but due to haste, there was an overconsumption of water, which led to increased costs of canal maintenance, rising groundwater, salinization of soils and their removal from land use.
 
Last edited:
I know Gorbachev is famous, obviously, but after sleeping on it I'm not actually sure that legal reform is what the USSR really needs right now. It certainly wouldn't hurt and I'm not like anti-Gorby, maybe if he makes it to full Services secretary he can get us Soviet Pizza Hut, but treating rurals like they're real citizens is probably overall more impactful for more people than legal reform?
Personally i am more Gorbachev because his focus on hiring service focused university graduates as that is an area where we really need to step up if we want to continue max funding education expansions next plan as we clearly are already struggling with hiring enough this plan and i only think it is going to get worse next as the education expansion is going to increase the amount of workforce that is educated.
 
The rural reconciliation project has been going on since the start of the quest, with...mixed results. By comparison, we've had very little opportunity to improve the civil rights situation, though I think it has somewhat improved just due to conditions no longer being apocalyptic.

All three candidates have some merit, but I think Gorbachev provides the rarest benefit, despite his obvious shortcomings. If we do pick him, we need to make sure he never becomes the full head of services.
 
If I can't have Soviet moon landing, I'm damn sure going to want heavy Soviet probe program.
Yeah I think we should go for the Full Surveys with the big heavy orbiters, they're a genuinely impressive technical feat that's much better suited to our budget and hardware/recent luck with the Luna and Mars probes. We decided to pivot to an unmanned probe focus when killing the moonshot, might as well actually do that now that it's come up.

It will mean no space station until the later 70s, probably, but that's an acceptable tradeoff to make Voyager look like a digital camera strapped to a car battery IMO. If even half the probes work it would put us decades ahead of the curve. First Jupiter/Saturn/Neptune/Uranus orbiters were 1995/2004/never/never OTL, and we could have all 4 by the 1980s TTL. It probably won't be 100% successful but even partial successes would still be very scientifically and technically impressive, while the difficulty should help push electronics technology.
 
Last edited:
I think I'm going to vote for Nikolay Fedorovich Tatarchuk instead of Gorbachev. I think Gorbachev is (unfortunately) still a really good option, but I'm interested in what Tatarchuk brings to the table. What I think is unconventional about him is that he's rising from the food program, and so agricultural department, instead of the services ministry. He's like Krylov in that's attempting to help people underserved by the current ministry, but he focuses primarily on the rural/urban gap with the experience to do it properly.

I think he'd be really good for getting rural populations to be more invested in the current system through providing services to them properly. This rural/urban gap is important to address now that we have the political ability to do so.

Various projects have pointed out the importance of this, but the one that stands out to me is Water and Waste Grants. The fact that this comes out of our agricultural department says a lot. I'm not sure exactly who's pushing for it, whether Klim, Smolin, or Skachkov, but using agricultural money for something infrastructure would normally do says a lot. It says extending proper water and sewage is essential for maintaining useful (i.e. educated) labor in these areas, and politically popular (which has already been stated by some progress on Water Distribution Systems. It's essential enough that we're putting this forward despite that it won't directly impact yields or sector growth.
 
As for Gorbachev, I highly recommend it. The fact is that during the years when he was the party secretary of the Stavropol Territory, he screwed up. In particular, the number of sheep decreased by 2.5 million heads, which undermined local sheep farming (the reason is the expense of constructing complexes unsuitable for keeping livestock). He survived due to notes and bribes. He also opened the Bolshoi Stavropol Canal ahead of schedule, but due to haste, there was an overconsumption of water, which led to increased costs of canal maintenance, rising groundwater, salinization of soils and their removal from land use.
That sounds like the opposite of a recommendation.

But even without this sketchy record, I'm feeling very strongly in favor of Tatarchuk. Expanding services to the countryside instead of just cities is a project that desperately needs to be done. Speaking of which, we really should []Authorize Farmer-Programs next turn.

I'm much more flexible on Klimenko's deputy, but I like the idea of Nukh Berzegov. Putting a Circassian in the ministry will lead to interesting new perspective and hopefully look good to our minorities. He also has economic experience which I expect will mean a global +5 or more modifier. An extra free dice is not bad after we lost some under The Voz, and 6 years as deputy should get him acceptable management experience by the time he takes the throne.

Crazy is convincing on the probes, but that does mean we'll need to really hope we don't get cost overruns on the Light Launcher and Nuclear Engine projects.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top