Attempting to Fulfill the Plan MNKh Edition

Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
[]Kliment Voroshilov: An old guard general focused on the continuation and modernization of the red army's current equipment. While unglamorous, the buildup would be along old lines and cost a relatively low amount of money. Some effort would be dedicated to new experimental programs, but the bulk of the cost would rapidly increase the army's size. As another side benefit, Voroshilov's political connections could be exploited to ensure a steady stream of support from up above. (+10 Party Influence)


[] 35% GNP: Through the re-direction of additional party funds towards the plan of industrialization and military production, it may be possible to far accelerate the pace of acceleration. This quantity is the maximum VSNKh economists believe can be utilized before major problems occur. (435 Resources per turn) (-15 Party Influence)

I think this combo is what we want if we still plan to go ham on super development growth rate as the first FYP. Party support and money are still our bottleneck.
 
A one-time cost of 15 PI to get an additional +50 resources/turn across the entire Plan will pay for itself in 2-3 turns by funding +PI options we've been consistently ignoring for budget reasons like the agricultural cooperativization projects, and then more than pay for itself by continuing to do so for the other 7 turns. We really need to take the 35% GNP option imo.
 
A one-time cost of 15 PI to get an additional +50 resources/turn across the entire Plan will pay for itself in 2-3 turns by funding +PI options we've been consistently ignoring for budget reasons like the agricultural cooperativization projects, and then more than pay for itself by continuing to do so for the other 7 turns. We really need to take the 35% GNP option imo.

Fair. You right.
 
Tukhachevsky seems good, though I worry he'll also get purged as historical and render these efforts moot.
He likely will get purged. Stalin is super paranoid about the guy, and it doesn't help that a lot of higher up Red Army officers hate his guts too.

I prefer Shaposhnikov since he's the middle of the road option that doesn't veer off in any particular direction. He's adaptable.

We can stick Tukhachevsky in a closed city.

EDIT: I've just been informed that Tukhachevsky will die no matter what unless the conservative old guard is chosen. Tuk will have to die, Klim is total garbage and must not become the head of the Red Army.
 
Last edited:
[]Aleksandr Vasilevsky
[] 35% GNP


Anything we build now is going to be obsolete by the time WW2 starts. So let's unfuck the leadership and build more industry. Build the tools to build the tools and all that.
 
We need M O R E R E S O U R C E S for sure if we are to meet another challenging Plan goal.
 
I like Shaposhnikov because the giant foundries you need to make artillery and the trucks you need to motorize logistics all have civilian uses on top of their military ones, but Vasilevsky's focus on leadership over equipment makes a lot of sense too. I worry he focuses a bit too much on infantry, but I can be convinced.
 
Some discord information for your consumption.

BlackstarToday at 19:36 said:
Quick bullet point overview - Military advisor options
-Total focus on the mechanization of the army
-Wants a massive armor arm
-Focus on an all mobile force
-The most expensive
-Equipment may be rendered obsolete
-Deep Battle Faction
-Buildup of the airforce
-Buildup of the mechanized arm
-Focus on the mobile force but not exclusively
-Expensive force
-Equipment may be rendered obsolete
-Focus on improving the logistics arm
-Focus on improving the artillery arm
-Large gun concentrations
-Motorization of logistics
-Buildup of sizable mobile force
-Moderately expensive
-Equipment may be rendered obsolete
-Focus on improving the Infantry arm
-Focus on improving the artillery arm
-Combined large scale infantry units
-Small Mobile force for exploitation
-Improvements in training and operational methodology
-Well connected
-Focus on infantry units
-Modernization of the infantry arm
-Creation of a light tank exploitation force
-Massive recruitment -Cheap

On topic of purge said:
VoidZeroToday at 19:45
if they don't get purged ?
or immune?

BlackstarToday at 19:45
None are immune
 
I like the radio and leadership focus route. With the recent introduction of basic education, we should have the beginnings of a army capable of being adaptable on the field.
 
Hum, only one airforce option...I guess I'll go for Vasilevsky, since it's - aside from the old schooler - the only not-equipment-dependent option...

Also, @Blackstar can we have something like a "rumormill"? Like, what's the situation in the rest of the world, right now? At least in Germany, since there we did change things, compared to OTL. So, it would be nice to be able to take stuff like that into account...
 
Given the size of Russia I think Logistics and Localized Leadership would decide matters, because there's no freaking way you could coordinate and supply anything without both.

I'm leaning logistics, because it won't matter much if your troops are making the best decisions, if they don't have the guns, food and winterwear they need.
 
Hum, only one airforce option...I guess I'll go for Vasilevsky, since it's - aside from the old schooler - the only not-equipment-dependent option...

Also, @Blackstar can we have something like a "rumormill"? Like, what's the situation in the rest of the world, right now? At least in Germany, since there we did change things, compared to OTL. So, it would be nice to be able to take stuff like that into account...
All will buildup the airforce, again none of these are fully head in the sand. The difference is the priority given at this part of the buildup/funding prioritization for this stage.

Also, I'll make a rumor mill/try to make one and see how it goes for the next turn.
 
Vasilevsky will improve the Red Army's leadership drastically, to the point that the Purge might not have much of an effect on the quality of leadership during the Great Patriotic War.

That said, he will require that we finish radio distribution projects before he gives us other military buildup projects:
HanEmpire
now I want to go for Vasilevsky and then over-commit on military factories so that we have good equipment anyway

Blackstar
Vasilevskiy just would not have the options for a while as he would want academies and massive amounts of radios.

HanEmpire
does that mean we'd have to finish the radio projects first before he presents us with the other projects?

Blackstar
Yep radio projects and expanded military radio projects
But, cheap accademies
Blackstar
Vasilevskiy will massively blunt the effects of the purge from having a lot of NCO/masses of new candidates pushing up

But, that will be at the cost of equipment due to different early focus
 
Last edited:
The more I think about it the more I settle on Shaposhnikov for the logistical focus, even if the artillery pieces he wants go obsolete an obsolete gun still works way better than an obsolete tank, and the steel foundries used to cast the gun plus the trucks to move its shells don't go obsolete (not on a timescale short of decades anyways)
 
Shaposhnikov or Vasilevsky for me. Better logistics and general staff (assuming they don't get purged lol) are critical for an army of our size (especially sans famine) for obvious reasons and we still get a mechanized force to test doctrine. Vasilevsky's new model officer is nice, but the really, really important part is proliferation of radios. Mouli's WW2 France quest showed how powerful it was for the Germans and how much our lack of them was a pain in the ass for us: Radios enable the military to complete the OODA loop far faster than anyone else, act with far greater autonomy and separation than anyone else (opening up world of strategic options), and will help cut off units (say, from a German blitzkreig) remain in contact with command and organize effective resistance. I'd love to see those nazi bastards try their usual tricks only to massively overextend themselves tactically against forces that seemingly won't rout.
 
Last edited:
Hrm good point, radios would be a massive gamechanger. I still worry that Vasilevsky focuses too much on infantry over mobile forces though, there's no reason we can't also build radios along side Shaposhnikov's artillery park we just need to invest the extra resources.
 
Last edited:
Shaposhnikov's key advantage is that he will allow the Soviets to blunt German attacks through the proliferation of artillery and he will also allow us to effectively exploit our strategic depth through the creation of the logistic arm. Vasilevsky is also an acceptable option, but the lagging equipment is also a big concern, we don't want to confront the Germans with obsolete equipment at all. At the very least we should have parity in equipment.
 
Shaposhnikov's key advantage is that he will allow the Soviets to blunt German attacks through the proliferation of artillery and he will also allow us to effectively exploit our strategic depth through the creation of the logistic arm. Vasilevsky is also an acceptable option, but the lagging equipment is also a big concern, we don't want to confront the Germans with obsolete equipment at all. At the very least we should have parity in equipment.
With 35% of the GNP, we'll be able to bull our way through the radio distribution program and get to the armaments projects early.
 
I'm not as technically versed as I'd need to be to answer this question: Will we have radio encryption for our forces in the field? I've got no idea how that works, but considering that the Enigma was such a big deal, I fear that secure communication will be difficult, when in the field...no?

(I'd still go for the option, just wanted to get this out.)

And, yeah, I'd assumed that airforce would be there in any case, but having a focus on it would've been nice...
 
I'm not as technically versed as I'd need to be to answer this question: Will we have radio encryption for our forces in the field? I've got no idea how that works, but considering that the Enigma was such a big deal, I fear that secure communication will be difficult, when in the field...no?

(I'd still go for the option, just wanted to get this out.)

And, yeah, I'd assumed that airforce would be there in any case, but having a focus on it would've been nice...
It's probably below our level of abstraction? And in any case we are building polytechnics in which I assume that encryption will be discussed.
 
Back
Top