On the left end, Kleschev did the world and the members of the Supreme Soviet a favor by dying of a heart attack early in the year, with large portions of his faction splintering and the largest part taken over by Mikhail Zimyanin, effectively an over-ambitious Pravda editor.
Aw, I'll miss Kleschev a bit.
All the insistence that Dzhussoev and Gulyam had that the reforms were the only way to go for the Austrian economy became effective attacks on their positions, ensuring that their strange deviations could be decisively expunged from the economic norm. Some of their supporters are still expected to stay and those who are convinced that capitalist methods of accumulation and development are the only way forward will keep to their perspectives no matter the reality, but an effective discreditation of the right wing has been achieved.
Well! This is a very good prize for going hands-off on Austria. If our loony wing had actually gotten any political influence, things would have been bad.
continuing the drive to triple-lap American steel production
Oh my...
This is US steel and pig iron production in OTL. Assuming the US of TTL are in the same ballpark (I could see US steel output being even higher in TTL since the US will have had more consistent economic intervention, the steel unions are probably an important group for the Democrats to curry favour with, lower military spending will mean that the US will have had more resources to invest domestically and there's been no oil crunch yet) our steel output is probably in the range of 350-450 million tonnes per annum. That's between 1/third and 1/half what China produces today and at least double what the OTL Soviet Union was producing in 1971 (in 1980 the Soviet Union produced 147.9 million tonnes a year, much of it low quality).
We are producing a STAGGERING amount of steel. I wonder what the heck we are actually using it on? Are we really building that much infrastructure compared to the OTL Soviet Union?
[]Inflatable Section Experiments: Launching an FGB-VA with the VA vehicle carrying an inflatable habitable section on its adaptor can prove the concept for future orbital work. The effective section itself will be a balloon designed to provide expansive living space for a theoretical crew with the conditions inside measured and monitored. If the test system works it can form a basis for the development of more advanced habitats, saving launch weight for a station program and enabling the construction of far larger experimental setups. Further, if the concept proves viable larger structures along the lines of centrifuges can be built to allow for more permanent orbital habitation in a decade. (-5 RpY Expected) (1 Dice)
I want. 'Nuff said.
[]Reusable Launchers: The initial MKAS program following the PKA was dismissed by Glushko as an impossible engineering nightmare but it can still be resumed for the sake of providing a lighter launch vehicle. Using long-burning hydrogen engines along with a reusable launcher attached to a drop tank will improve launch capacity and especially if paired with a carrier aircraft reduce costs. The technologies for the project itself are available today with the only issue being the degree of complicated engineering work. It is believed to be possible that some form of the MKAS concept could be launched in the decade allowing space to be opened to low-cost space launch. (-10 RpY Expected) (1 Dice)
A light air-launched rocket could be useful, especially for the military (the airplane mothership would allow access to a wide variety of orbits at short notice) but designing an airplane suitable to be the mothership has proven to be challenging in OTL (though it would push forward our aerospace engineering, and yield some very big planes which could be used for other things potentially, much as the Antonov An-225 found a niche as a specialist logistics vehicle). But this wouldn't really be a path to a reuseable vehicle that could operate on the sort of scale that could make it cost competitive with our current expendable RLA vehicles and we in no way need any of the things this sort of platform would give us. We can make do with what we currently have.
This is a glorified science project that could yield mildly useful hardware.
[]Bulk Launch Methods: The rocket has historically been the only way that payloads and humans have gotten into space, but several other concepts deserve exploration. Everything from structural and design elevations on orbital cable elevators to rocket sleds must be considered. This program itself is only expected to be theoretical and focused on making designs for the possibility along with several small-scale models for scientific viability. Some plans have already been dismissed but investing in the future potential of orbit and easy delivery to space has always been a cornerstone of the program. (-5 RpY Expected) (1 Dice)
Could be interesting to poke this.
My personal view is that bulk launch methods like launch loops, rocket sleds or space elevators require such high demand for getting lots of stuff off of the Earth that we are unlikely to see enough demand for these to be viable in the next century, if ever.
There comes a point where if you need that much crud in space it is cheaper to make the babies who'll grow up to be new workers up there and build moon bases and factories to make all the stuff that doesn't absolutely have to come from Earth.
In other words, this is a science project that will probably never yield useful hardware.
[]Mars Sample Return: The Mars program has demonstrated that a lander can be launched and landed on the surface but further steps are needed to develop the techniques necessary for landing a larger craft. The RLA-3 has the throw weight necessary for providing a heavy enough lander and the capacity for a sample return but the technologies involved are still purely theoretical. A series of heavier landers with accompanying rovers can be developed to test landing systems. Assuming an ideal timeframe would allow a sample return before the end of the decade along with the development of hardware capable of a partially propulsive landing. (-10 RpY Expected) (1 Dice)
I want to complete nuclear engines before we go for this one.
A nuclear drive would ENORMOUSLY increase the size of the sample that could be sent back to Earth as such a mission could have a much larger return stage. Bigger samples mean more science.
[]Station Program: With the availability of the RLA-3 for the launch of very heavy payloads, nothing prevents the development and launch of a forty-ton habitable module to orbit. The module will then be crewed through a conventional launch of the FGB-VA bus along with the transfer of experiments and technologies aboard. The development of a whole new spacecraft will take some time, but starting work towards the sustained habitation of space can enable further projects in low earth orbit and truly long-duration experiments. Current limitations in electrical and thermal systems will be the major limit on the duration of these integrated stations, but if the next decade can replicate the gains of the last ten years those will be blown past. (-25 RpY Expected) (1 Dice)
I want to finish playing with inflatable test articles before we fund a space station.
[]Mercury Exploration Program: Current techniques and probes are sufficient for the flyby of mercury, with the main limitation falling towards the boost stage. Due to the problematic orbit of mercury, an intercept requires a massive degree of velocity to even attempt. Combining an RLA-3 along with a newly developed enlarged interplanetary stage is one proposal for such a mission allowing for an easy capability expansion without new technical developments. The stage will use the same engines and same tankage techniques if significantly scaled up for increased capability. Orbiting mercury is beyond any developed rocket, but a theoretical nuclear engine may be able to fix that. (-5 RpY Expected) (1 Dice)
A Mercury mission could be good right now.
[]CMEA Payloads: Comecon has always wanted to launch more tonnage but at the current rates that has been questionable. Fully bringing the space program into international prominence can help any member nation deliver non-military payloads to space for a nominal cost, further improving scientific return and justifying the massive investments made to the RLA. Most of the payloads have come as a part of the German and Indian programs but those alone are expected to be sufficient to keep the production capacity of RLA's saturated for the near future and ensure a steady increase in orbital development. The capitalist world is currently behind in space program integration and ensuring that CMEA fills the lists of below the US and Union is a practical diplomatic coup. (Expands Maximum Spending) (1 Dice)
Absolutely must do this! We wanna get lots of use out of our RLAs and we don't want our friends thinking that they need to blow their funds making their own rockets. I want all of our allies investing in cool hardware that we can borrow to super charge our manned program in a few years, or into cool hardware producing data they can share with our scientists...
Prison Reform Program: Following the report of the Obukhov Commission on the prison crisis and seeking a way to modernize the industry several changes are expected to be implemented. Previous methods of increasing workforce participation have proven to be questionable in implementation with punishment proving to be a lacking implementation. Rather than focusing on punishment, the system can be shifted towards encouraging work through alternative means. New extended sentencing guidelines will be passed with the expectation that if a prisoner is participating in work programs the sentences will be effectively reduced. For those that do not work, this represents a near doubling of sentences but it will remove the incentives for the excessive punishment of non-working prisoners. (1 Dice) (Supreme Soviet)
Worth doing just to start moving away from the punishment-focused system we inherited from the Tsars.
Domestic Production Program: Balakirev has come to the arguably good political decision that the current struggle with trade balances makes a fertile political environment. Coming on hard to the fiber issue Balakirev has advocated for tariffs on imported fibers to improve the profitability of domestic production and strengthen industry discipline. This is to be accompanied by a strong subsidy for plants that utilize domestic petroleum by allowing them to fast-track several regulations to increase production as rapidly as possible. The full act is unlikely to pass, but some watered-down version is nearly certain to get through the Supreme Soviet, if only as a hanger-on to other legislation. (1 Dice) (Balakirev)
Sheesh. I'm not keen on this. We'd be shooting India in the foot and loosening safety regulations on our synthetic fibre manufacturing for what? If we want to improve our trade balance, we can work on other things.
[]Immigration Reforms: There is a desperate need for more labor primarily in non-university-educated segments of the population. Sourcing it domestically has already posed severe limitations with a lack of supply of new workers graduating from universities despite the post-war population boom. By burning some influence the general immigration laws can be further opened, allowing citizenship to be granted for strategic and technical education on an accelerated basis along with improving the flow of immigration throughout CMEA. Enterprises will further be allowed to sponsor as many applicants as desired, with cross-border applications directly allowed and pre-approved for any work that cannot be filled over three months with a domestic applicant. (Uses Favor) (1 Dice)
This sounds very promising.
It'll cause brain drain issues for our allies, but improving our immigration laws to attract the best of the best will help the people we're importing as cheap labour too. Plus this should generally strengthen the CMEA.
[]Expanding Preparation Schools: Those going into university from a suboptimal educational background or general tracks have only steadily expanded in recent years. With the pressure to improve education, the question of sufficient preparation for entrance exams is pertinent and essential for improving student achievement. Taking over partially from the private sector several programs in mathematics and sciences can be started to allow more motivated students to improve their educations and compensate for poor previous performance in placements. The majority of institutions will run on the weekends and during the summer, providing opportunities and reducing scheduling conflicts. (100 Resources per Dice 0/150) (-8 CI2 Electricity +2 Educated Labor)
We should probably do this at some point in the near future tho. Don't want to make it so we make up too much of our educated labour shortfall by taking other people's graduates.
[]Expanded Education: More students need to go into the education system as the previous lengthening of terms is still working itself through the system. The priority will thus fall towards a comprehensive reform of the middling and lower paths of the education system to improve the performance of non-university-bound students. Technical school graduates will be offered a final year program that directly corresponds to a certification with automatic enrolment assuming a conclusion of the program and following work. To improve labor responses a considerable amount of funding can be pushed towards corrective institutions, compensating for children that would otherwise fall out of the system through an intensive program of boarding schools to re-introduce them to the standard curriculum. (Uses Favor) (1 Dice)
I am not sure that this is such a good education reform though. Especially given the cost.
[]Force a Euro Vote: The current economic crisis in CMEA is the perfect pretext for driving forward decisive reforms to improve integration and local economics. The Euro is still in its prototypical stages but something along the lines of a universal currency of interconvertibility can be implemented now. This would be an effective introduction of standards for national economies including maximum deficits outside emergency circumstances, a normalization of interest rates, and several financial standards otherwise only upheld in the Union and Germany. The new currency itself would serve as a transitional point, taking a basket of currencies across the block to keep its valuation stable while expanding its use for all inter-state banking transactions. (Uses Favor) (1 Dice)
This option is SUPER interesting. We already used a favour to push for accellerated Euro adoption. This... I dunno. That this is an option worries me about what is going on politically. Assuming that the Euro isn't just dead without spending two favours on the project, I worry that pushing it too hard will lead to a sloppy Euro. Plus, there's probably better uses for that favour, like immigration reform.
[]Enterprise Benefits: Allowing enterprises to offer expanded benefits can be a means of reducing direct labor price raises while continuing to expand services. An enterprise partnering with state services at a larger scale can allow some savings to be provided along with ensuring that job offers are not a direct competition of funding. The largest factor of these is likely to be canteen costs being deferred along with partnerships with local businesses to provide services to workers for free. Little reductions are expected from a full passage but even a tiny reduction in labor costs is an improvement to economic efficiency. (1 Dice)
Oh heck no! No way! The OTL Soviet Union did this sort of thing and it made the enterprises more difficult to control, since they not only provided favours, and gave people jobs, they also gave people key services! We absolutely do not want!
[]Scientific Exchange Programs: Formalizing large-scale study and student programs to analyze foreign farming practices can improve domestic experiences and transfer new techniques. Much of what is learned will be more of an academic curiosity than useful information, but any improvement that can be made is an improvement. Borrowing techniques aren't expected to walk over any toes, as even the capitalists have not trademarked any methodologies. Expertise transfer is not expected to remotely work during this plan, but it can help in the next plan. (1 Dice)
Can't go wrong with freedom of information where science is concerned.
[]Restructuring Bonus Allocations: The allocation of bonuses for worker performance has always been done at the managerial level but further efforts to improve allocations can be undertaken. Recentralizing the control of allocation towards lower level management for individual workers along with enforcing performance rating schemes can provide for a more dynamic and efficient environment. This will effectively decentralize the scheme along with implementing a formal rating system for most state enterprises ensuring that the most productive workers are compensated for their work. Bonus pay will further be publicized to ensure that rewards are fair and transparent, improving the worker's view of the system and eliminating any criticism of its allocation. (1 Dice)
More transparent bonuses sound good.
[]Labor Cost Adjustments: Labor cost increases are only expected to increase as the Union continues its drive towards modernization leaving several sectors of the economy growing more expensive. Measures to control costs will have to be taken to provide for low-cost construction labor if development is to continue at the same pace. A full currency revaluation is beyond the scope of ability either politically or economically but several softer measures can be implemented. Reducing same-job cost increase maximums can allow current growth in labor costs to be slowed and improve the dynamism of labor by encouraging varied employment. (1 Dice)
I'm not sure what this reform does. Anyone understand the bureaucratese here?
Regards,
fasquardon