So we're just giving up on it?
So we're just giving up on it?
Personally I gave up years ago when Gorky imploded, that was pretty much unrecoverable in time to make the growth target unless we really plowed money and free dice into HI. Which, at the time, would have meant an (even worse) unemployment and/or energy crisis, so, probably was never really feasible then and definitely isn't now.
A fair point.Yeah it's pandering to the political target for CA regional roads, definitely suboptimal economically but this is the price of democracy"". We could put a focus on, but I honestly don't care thaaaat much about a 25% chance of coming up a little short. We'll still have bought off a majority of the politicians in the region, and a whole extra Bureau action on something proactive seems like it has the better marginal value.
The appliance plants are profitable, consume educated labor, and high value enough to definitely secure our consumer goods target. Oil... yeah, it's the last phase for both of them and I'm comfortable with the 2% chance of getting annihilated during an election year oil crisis. It'll probably be fine. Probably.
Is this meetable by throwing dice and money at Sevastapol and other Capital Goods projects?20% Increase in Capital Goods Production Value: Behind Moving Target
Good thing we went for PWR instead of other designs, this could have been an actual disaster.Loss of coolant of the Chita-1 core leads to a short period of element exposure in the realm of conventional operation.
I feel like this would make a dent in the sheer amount of General Labour we get each turn now.
It might be a good idea to take this to finally get Heavy Industry a deputy.
I support this, for what it's worth. It's the end of the plan, I think we should be able to relatively painlessly encourage Glushko to step down/retire together with all the other politicians that are doing so. As time goes and space projects become more and more complex, we'll need a modern system instead of conflicting OKBs lead by primadonnas grabbing everything they can grab - we've all seen the consequences of that during alternative moon proposals debacle.If we're taking advantage of the secure economic targets and the election campaign to clean house and de-Voz some more, maybe this is the turn to fire Glushko?
If we can't double dice it this turn and thus guarrantee it finishing then we put one dice on it with a tiny hope of finishing it. And how can you assume we would have enough resources to do it next turn/plan? We doing a HI heavy plan (most expensive department) + atomash (most expensive project). So putting 1 dice now is a investment regardless and we would only need need to put 0 (hopefully) or 1 die next turn, which is an expensive die we could use next turn in other things. Also note we are running on 1 year turn and a turn without investing on computer is year(maybe not) we are further behind.Considering that one die gives only ~10% chance of completion and that next turn our budget is going to be in a much better position, are we not better served by investing two dice next turn instead of one die for two turns?
Because even leaving aside the possibility of increasing our budget, next turn we won't have the debt to pay off, will probably have finished Sevastopol and our economy will grow from various high profit projects we are finishing this turn, and also just in general. Even accounting for Atommash, we will be in a better position to invest into costly things.And how can you assume we would have enough resources to do it next turn/plan?
As I said, is this really true? It's mainly a production project, and leaving aside the tiny chance of finishing it, I don't think there's much benefit in having it partially completed. Is it worth betting on that tiny chance when there's some hefty opportunity cost?Also note we are running on 1 year turn and a turn without investing on computer is year(maybe not) we are further behind.
Atommash alone eats up both the resources we freed from debt and Sevastapol plus we have 16 dice of HI which are very expensive so I highly doubt we would even be able to use our all our dice.Because even leaving aside the possibility of increasing our budget, next turn we won't have the debt to pay off, will probably have finished Sevastopol and our economy will grow from various high profit projects we are finishing this turn, and also just in general. Even accounting for Atommash, we will be in a better position to invest into costly things.
Lmao NASA doesn't exist. The US doesn't even have a civilian space program, it's all run by I think the Navy, or possibly Air Force. It's utterly hilarious that we are the ones with a highly developed civilian focused space program.So do we know what NASA has been up to recently?
Besides that I will vote for any plan that has this.
[]Domestic Lithographic Equipment:
Gotta keep pumping our computer industry.
Holy shit we reached the Agricultural target ALREADY? Damn. Good for us, means we can put effort into soil preservation and such this turn instead of rushing meat!State of the Eighth Five-Year Plan:
35% Increase in MFPG Production Value: At Moving Target
20% Increase in Capital Goods Production Value: Behind Moving Target
50% Increase in Consumer Goods Production Value: Ahead of Moving Target
30% Increase in Agricultural Sector Production Value: Completed
55% Increase in Service Sector Production Value: Ahead of Moving Target
CMEA prices are only barely below international and the 40 threshold. We DESPERATELY need more oil this turn.Petroleum Fuels: (30/38/39) (Sole Exporter/Modifying CMEA Prices) (20-40 Strong Increase in Economic Growth, Fuel Use, and Chemical Development)
+5 Net Civilian Spending
+1 Fields Depletion
-1 Field Modernization
Could be worth it, but since Klim's foci only get +5 on non service projects their use is limited.To be clear, this is because we have a mandate to do the Central Asian regional roads but not the big highways, right? Also, with seven dice on the same project, spending a Bureaucracy die for focus might actually pay off. Is that something you've considered?
Several papers on both sides of the ideological conflict have been published remarking on a remarkable phenomenon of the modification of terrestrial albedo through the release of carbon dioxide. Current briefings have indicated the effect as mild and strongly beneficial for the Union as increases in temperature are expected to increase arable territory while coming at practically little cost. Further, if arctic temperatures increase significantly the sheer commercial potential of accessible northern ports and mineral reserves cannot in any way be under-estimated. Opening the mines in good conditions with good logistics will significantly improve the economy of the Union faster than almost any other proposed logistical project.
Yeah no. I am not risking this again. I want a safety margin in CMEA fuel prices and I want it soon.The appliance plants are profitable, consume educated labor, and high value enough to definitely secure our consumer goods target. Oil... yeah, it's the last phase for both of them and I'm comfortable with the 2% chance of getting annihilated during an election year oil crisis. It'll probably be fine. Probably.
It's not only a production project, but it's a research into the practicalities of mass production of a theoretical project, which, well, needs to actually reach the stage of mass production to really research it, in my opinion. It's not entirely useless before it's finished, but it doesn't do much as far as I can see.Its not only a production project, Blackstar mentioned that its also involves researching how to make the equipment that we are going to use to mass produce it. So its both a research and a production project, which is why its so expensive.
It's the steel discount I think ,we have a minus 20 to infra but you have to apply it since the projects don't reflect it
Even IRL, Climate change denial only occured after a period of acceptance, when hte fossil fuel industry ran the numbers.Good news: Anthropogenic climate change seem to be accepted in scientific community in both side of the Cold War.
Bad News: They still think global warming is a good thing, so no one is going to care about greenhouse gas emission for a while.
Given we don't particularly benefit from having more steel so long as we keep below 40 price, and that Novouralsk both has High Profitability and helps fix a specific known problem (insufficient haulage for our expanding road network which we make up with imports from the west) along with helping the CapGoods target, I do not see the logic behind building Mangyshlak rather than the trucks.I don't care enough about topsoil preservation to throw more than minimum viable amount of dice at it this turn; That, combined with personal attention on kindergartens and no home appliance factories, allows for both 2 dice on lithography machines and for rolling on Mangyshlak for moar steel - even if Novouralsk would probably be a better investment.
Given we don't particularly benefit from having more steel so long as we keep below 40 price, and that Novouralsk both has High Profitability and helps fix a specific known problem (insufficient haulage for our expanding road network which we make up with imports from the west) along with helping the CapGoods target, I do not see the logic behind building Mangyshlak rather than the trucks.
Sure, it helps develop central asia. But that's pretty low priority compared to everything else.
Thanks for the reminder to feed spare free dice to Glushko though! :3