A Sword Without a Hilt: A Song of Ice and Fire/D&D 3.5 Crossover
- Thread starter DragonParadox
- Start date
-
- Tags
- a song of ice and fire a sword without a hilt d&d 3.5 dungeons & dragons 100% high octane dragon fuel ave corvidae battle action dragon diplomacy best sister bureaucromancy delicious soul-stuff dragon dreams come true dragon ta'veren greatest uncle hubris is a coward's word in defiance of gods and men mammon's folly mutually assured mage's disjunction qm murderhobo top tier coatl
. But it's not like there 
- Location
- Brazil
More like 105, save for half.
Crake
I AM THE STORM THAT IS APPROACHING
- Location
- USA
Wait... backing up. We're dropping a Firebrand first before SotD?
Why?
That seems like overkill.
- Location
- Brazil
I'm going with Firebrand so we could finish the Oracle off with Shadow, but on second thought, let's switch it up.
Crake
I AM THE STORM THAT IS APPROACHING
- Location
- USA
- Location
- Germany
He brought a new 16 lesser devils with him.
That's a pretty heavy reinforcement, including the boss this is worth more than the crew originally on deck.
- Location
- Australia
126. CL18 with Fire Spells, and uncapped dice (to + half Cha mod) with +1 damage per die. Half of that would still wipe a Steel Devil so I'm curios.
- Location
- Brazil
I'm even saying we let the golems be if we can wipe the devils out. Hopefully the Oracle has the control token, but we can.
These devils are most likely advanced by a fighter level or two. Or perhaps simple Advanced template.
It uncapts to 15d6, maximized is 90 damage, plus 15.
These devils are most likely advanced by a fighter level or two. Or perhaps simple Advanced template.
tarrangar
Fat arctic chicken
We absolutely aren't on the wrong side of this situation, the other side is losing, why would you want to be on their side?
- Location
- Brazil
What's that golem control spell again?
- Location
- United States
Capable of being cast through Greater Shadow Enchantment, too.
Even just one of these being captured would increase the loot pile quite a bit and increase what's to be split up.
- Location
- Australia
- Location
- Brazil
If we capture those through apparent master and they have the gall to demand one, I'm just going to vote to stare at them really hard and ask them to repeat that.
- Location
- Brazil
Crake
I AM THE STORM THAT IS APPROACHING
- Location
- USA
Also that.
3.5 Trumps PF. Common mistake. I do it all the time.
- Location
- Australia
No, that's what I was arguing applied, but apparently there's a newer edtion.
My link wasn't PF, just an earlier edition than Spell Compendium.
Crake
I AM THE STORM THAT IS APPROACHING
- Location
- USA
And apparently it wasn't PF?
Less common mistake... why are there so many D&D editions?!
- Location
- being near locations is my passion.
I don't see why A Sword Without a Hilt: A Song of Ice and Fire/D&D 3.5 Crossover | Page 6044 would not apply to 3.5 firebrand, but I am curious how @DragonParadox allocates the die cap increase.
- Location
- Brazil
It does.
Pay attention, Deliste was looking at the wrong version of Firebrand. The one we use, the newest one, caps at 10d6 on the first round, and half that on the second one if they were hit.
- Location
- being near locations is my passion.
@DragonParadox is Tyene close enough to to the boss to hit with an asr reached curse on his fort save, or (@Thread) would her action be better spent dropping a mass cure light wounds? To stop the pirate from bleeding out if possible, and to take the edge off the ones who are, apparently, quite injured.
- Location
- Brazil
Lets see when the turn to decide their actions comes up.
- Location
- being near locations is my passion.
Fair enough. I'm just mildly enamoured with the idea of a no-death run on the pirate's part.