That's a pretty steep investment for a niche spell effect, but when you're enemy is known to make heavy use of Constructs, it's certainly not a bad one.OOC: For anyone wondering how Lanna was able to control your constructs, well not easily. Chained Control Construct. She was only able to chain it because she had Easy Metamagic and Arcane Thesis reducing the slot required to 'only' ninth level. Not yet edited
I have no urge to Pokemon either of them. If we even allow them to live, it's gonna taking some pretty seriously extenuating circumstances.Ugh.
I am glad we havent lost much with this, but damn am I not happy they survived.
Can we please not pokemon over them? Pretty please?
For Lanna to be functional and have 17th level spellcasting at a minimum, yet to bear multiple facial scars and be down an eye...I'm afraid there is something very unsettling going on that we don't know the full details of yet.I will not say anything on the matter until we can see what the fuck was going on over the last year.
Why she failed to resist this weird enchantment despite being a mage of the Ninth Circle and pretty familiar with Tywin's ways of hyper-control.
Honestly, without a damn good reason for that I'll propably not even argue to let her live, she's clearly too easily subverted to be of any value.
don't Sha'Ir only gain 9th lvl at lvl 18?For Lanna to be functional and have 17th level spellcasting at a minimum, yet to bear multiple facial scars and be down an eye...I'm afraid there is something very unsettling going on that we don't know the full details of yet.
I can all too easily imagine Tywin having her subjected to some sort of horrific ritual to further bind her or to force her cooperation.
Agreed. No desire to recruit her, but her life isn't automatically forfeit, either. If she and Gerion are allowed to go free, probably the best they could hope for is exile.She has the right to a fair trial and hearing considering that for the better part of a year she was under a familial compulsion spell. I am not saying we recruit her(god no). I am saying we hear her out and see what all this is.
Could be. I'm not super familiar with the class and haven't looked at it in years.
Casters capable of using 9th level spells are by definition rather hard to ignore.You know just because you spare a character from death does not mean you have to interact with them narratively if you do not want to.
Yeah, there's something deeply wrong with that, scars on a high-end caster are a bad sign.I can all too easily imagine Tywin having her subjected to some sort of horrific ritual to further bind her or to force her cooperation.
With all else going on I would not rule out that the feats were switched out with Psychic Surgery or some other trick, maybe by the Fomorians.
At first I was assuming it was to control our own Constructs, but upon further thought, it was probably necessary to wrangle their anti-Dragon Constructs. Those Iron Wyrms would have been CR 17 at a basic level before being further modified, including being empowered by the sacrifice of multiple Valyrian Dragons and having Human mages grafted to them. It's likely those things were only functional beyond being berserk killing machines due to her controlling them.
Casters capable of using 9th level spells are by definition rather hard to ignore.
It's either recruitment or death for her. Anything else would be idiotic on our part.
Certainly not, we won't throw away a ninth circle caster in the case that we do consider her relativly innocent.I would like her to at least get a chance of justifying herself. If worst come to worst, we soul surgery the magic part of her away and erase a few years of memory from her head and have constantly watched.
Provided it was all mind control and she isn't complicit.
To some degree? Probably. My issue with her is that she gets pretty obvious plot armor, both in battles and in regards to her actions. I'm pretty sure we will find all her dodgy actions are purely the result of mind-control and Tywin threatening her.I mean sure you can recruit her, that does not mean you guys have to see her often on screen if you do not want to. Maybe I'm wrong but I get the feeling that it is interacting with her that is the problem for some voters.
My problem is that some voters seem to turn off their sensibility once named canon character appears on-screen and they try loot them regardless of how insensible it is IC.Maybe I'm wrong but I get the feeling that it is interacting with her that is the problem for some voters.
Even best case scenario and she's been mind controlled for a significant length of time, she was still almost certainly complicit in Tywin's early widespread use of mind control on a large portion of Westerosi nobility, probably most of the Westerlands.I'm probably missing something because I'm not sure what the problem with the ok lannisters is? I thought we wanted to smush Tywin/torture him, not those he controlled?
Why should we do this narratively though? Viserys has IC no reason to be attached to her or to spend so much effort on her. Not even that she is a 9th level caster. We tend to sacrifice those often enough these days.I want to interact with her, see her onscreen, and get a feel for her personality. Making any judgements before that is premature. And I think it's a huge shame to avoid any interaction with such an important antagonist just because we're (apparently unanimously?!?) afraid of a hypothetical loot-tendency.
I campaigned for assassinating her for months back in the day, so you can be sure I'm not saying this as a plot to recruit her or anything
I'm pretty sure we will find all her dodgy actions are purely the result of mind-control and Tywin threatening her.
OOC value is what decides who we interact with narratively. We routinely get important Inquisition reports as blocks of spoilered bullet points if OOC we don't really care about the preliminary steps, the fleshforged minions or the random location.Why should we do this narratively though? Viserys has IC no reason to be attached to her or to spend so much effort on her. Not even that she is a 9th level caster. We tend to sacrifice those often enough these days.
Her value is purely OOC.
I'm perfectly fine with that being used as a yard stick on what to do with her. But to be honest, my hackles are already raising due to the talk about how actually none of the bad stuff is her fault anyway.Honestly, the Lannisters have done lots of bad things, but they've done nothing worse than what some of our previous recruits have done. IMO the big disqualifier for recruitment should be "will be disloyal to us", not "did more Evil than the actual contract devil we hired" or whatever. Maybe PR could weigh in, but that's about it.
EDIT: I don't want to make "doesn't really care about offscreen evil" one of Viserys' character traits.