Yet you are doing
the same thing to Azel, no?
This is fairly hypocritical of you.
Azel'a criticism has place in this quest.
We are fairly low-key in how we do things compared to other quests, too...
That guy I mentioned?
Who gave "criticism" on Lucan and left?
That stuff was inexcusable and just trying to hurt people pouring sweat and blood into the quest to make it work, because he
didn't like it.
Azel's stuff comes from both loving this story/quest
and wanting it to be
better.
Yes, he salts.
Wouldn't
you, if every almost every person who
ever responded to his plans/ideas in-depth criticized them?
I dare you to try and find an idea of his in this quest that
didn't cause
someone to salt over it, for one reason or the other.
And yet, he objectively made the game, and the story,
better.
Hope you don't mind me pointing out either, that
every change that came for Big Better in this quest, came from active criticism?
Maybe salty, but
active discussion?
It has it's place.
As much as discussion on Morality System did.
As much as discussion on Month Mechanics did (for all my poor conduct then).
As much as change on way we do RAs/MAs did.
As much as change of way we structure narrative (no interlude-interrupts) now.
DP
always feels bad when we criticize things this way.
Because he feels that he
failed us/the story and there's "no fixing it now that we got this far" from such a failure.
Only, like,
every time there has been.
So yeah, even stuff DP stated above aside, this way of criticizing is
important and established in this quest. No matter how personal it may be in
this specific case.
...Sorry
@Azel, after the years of this shit I feel like this
needs to be said, even if I come off as overly defensive of you as such :/