Speaking of Dark Sister, its spell combat ability is an excellent mechanic. For those unaware, it enables Viserys to both full attack and cast a spell in the same turn, while still potentially Quickening a second spell to boot.

"But Nickan, Viserys is not melee specced at all! Comparatively pathetic strength score, no real feat investment or item investment and everyone knows one handed weapons are not the way to go for proper murderblending! Not to mention having to cast defensively if in melee!"

Fear not, random quester, for Nickan has considered them issues and found such.. Insufficient for stopping a Dragon Sorcerer Pirate Emperor! 'Tis true, stabbing peeps with Dark Sister would do so little relative damage against high level foes, Viserys might as well not bother. The equation however sharply changes if one enters Maneuvers, of which most only care about ability to meet a particular score called CMD and can be substituted from attacks. What d'y know, having full BaB and the standard buffs thrown up gives such a fairly decent chance. Disarm to remove random minor artifacts like our own now redeemed Staff of the Ages as well as weapons from play, Sunder to destroy spell component pouches or holy symbols potentially inhibiting spellcasting and finally Trip, to give the melee doods a large boost in offensive capability while putting foes in precarious position indeed. Viserys has a concentration bonus of Yes, so casting defensively would not be an issue.

All in all, an increase in combat power, Viserys tanking some blows as melee that might be fatal to those sad not-Dragons/Blocking charge lines, minor boost to fame since the particular mechanic is rare as all hell and most important of all, Dark Sister is pleased.
 
Speaking of Dark Sister, its spell combat ability is an excellent mechanic. For those unaware, it enables Viserys to both full attack and cast a spell in the same turn, while still potentially Quickening a second spell to boot.

"But Nickan, Viserys is not melee specced at all! Comparatively pathetic strength score, no real feat investment or item investment and everyone knows one handed weapons are not the way to go for proper murderblending! Not to mention having to cast defensively if in melee!"

Fear not, random quester, for Nickan has considered them issues and found such.. Insufficient for stopping a Dragon Sorcerer Pirate Emperor! 'Tis true, stabbing peeps with Dark Sister would do so little relative damage against high level foes, Viserys might as well not bother. The equation however sharply changes if one enters Maneuvers, of which most only care about ability to meet a particular score called CMD and can be substituted from attacks. What d'y know, having full BaB and the standard buffs thrown up gives such a fairly decent chance. Disarm to remove random minor artifacts like our own now redeemed Staff of the Ages as well as weapons from play, Sunder to destroy spell component pouches or holy symbols potentially inhibiting spellcasting and finally Trip, to give the melee doods a large boost in offensive capability while putting foes in precarious position indeed. Viserys has a concentration bonus of Yes, so casting defensively would not be an issue.

All in all, an increase in combat power, Viserys tanking some blows as melee that might be fatal to those sad not-Dragons/Blocking charge lines, minor boost to fame since the particular mechanic is rare as all hell and most important of all, Dark Sister is pleased.
Yep, the Spell Combat ability is what ultimately led to us deciding to give Dark Sister to Viserys.

And despite having a less than impressive Strength attribute in his fully Human form, Viserys' Strength increases to 22 in Medium Half-Dragon form and 30 in Large Half-Dragon form (the practical maximum size he could be at and still wield Dark Sister).
 
Inserted tally
Adhoc vote count started by DragonParadox on Dec 23, 2019 at 3:57 AM, finished with 252 posts and 19 votes.
 
Part MMMCCXLVIII: A Union of Laws
A Union of Laws

Twenty Seventh Day of the Eleventh Month 293 AC

Inheritance has been a headache for every Targaryen king and you would wager for every one that came before them down through the ages from the Long Night onward, but you would wager it has never been a concern in quite this manner. With the return of magic and the opening of the ways to the Elemental Spheres and the cosmos beyond the world is changed in ways that is no respecter of laws and traditions of humankind, so they too must change. More than that, in your travels you have seen the ways in which even the most commonplace of restrictions can lead to pain and heartbreak.

Lady Shyra Errol still lives in fear that her affections for Elys Penrose will be revealed and you are not so naive as to think that is the worst such circumstances can lead to. A noble has the protection of his or her name and House, the wealthy can buy privacy and peace of mind both with silver, at least to a degree, but for the poor or those simply making due where is that relief if they should love not as others expect or wish? So you have gathered in your council chamber at this early hour Dany for her passion and cleverness both, Tyene to speak of the Westerosi perspective of which you are not as acquainted as you might like, Malarys for his legal mind and insight into the workings of the Freehold, and Ser Richard to make sure that if the rest of you build castles in the air at least the cloud will be thick enough underfoot.

"On the matter of marriages that cannot produce offspring by the most common way the Freefold's law was clear," Malarys begins. "An heir is defined by the will of the one bequeathing whatever title or possession is at stake. Adopting one's nephew to pass over a spendthrift son was common enough that complaints regarding such arrangements became short-hand for uninteresting unfulfilling work, 'there's a nephew for you to handle' was something of a jest among the Essarian legal counsel of all stripes. This was by no means the full extent of the law on adoption. There were cases of people passing over hundreds of family members to elevate some obscure cousin who had shown exceptional promise. Indeed, one of my mentors encountered a case where the head of a middling noble House elevated his most favored slave to succeed him through adoption, though he was not in the lest related. The young man was of the blood of the Dragon Lords enough to bond with a dragon so the matter was settled and opposing claims tossed out, though the intrigues that marked that House were still raging when I took my first case forty years after the fact so I would not call that a wise choice on the part of the patriarch of the time."

"So if someone went to the flesh-crafters for a baby..." Dany began.

"He or she would be discretely checked for mind magic or other compulsions," Malarys interjected dryly, eliciting a laugh from Tyene. "The flesh-smiths were not trusted, and given the philosophies we have discovered they held to and how far they were willing to go following in their wake, I would say neither were they trustworthy." He waves the matter aside, spell-forged rings glittering in the unwavering magelight. "That aside, yes, if magic were required in the conception of a child than he or she would have to be formally adopted by the parents shortly after birth. As for the nature of said parents..."

He shuffles through his papers. "The Freehold and most of its colonies at the time of the Doom recognized unions of two or more citizens who wished to untie their fortunes and lineages as being married, the law did not concern itself with any other quality other than citizenship in good standing. As the usual purpose of marriage was propagation of the bloodline and the passing of inheritance to the next generation most marriages were not that different from the norm today, though few would gainsay a dragonrider who wished more unusual arrangements."

"The law is still on the books in that form in Volantis, though according to Wisdom Zherys it has been little used over the last few hundred years. In Tyrosh and Myr it has been changed to a more restrictive form, while Lys recognizes a 'lesser form' of marriage between two men or two women." You suspect his disdain is more for unneeded legal complexity, which he has tried to work against ever since becoming Lord Justice, and not the unfairness of the treatment that brings a frown to Dany's face.

"That won't be easy to swallow in the Seven Kingdoms, not if we present it as Valyrian law," Tyene notes thoughtfully. "You could throw a bone to the faith and disallow close kin marriages."

"Which would create legal distinctions between different parts of the realm and further deepen cultural cleavages," Dany cuts in, with Malarys nodding in agreement. "No one is forcing them to marry any differently than they did before, it only opens the way for other options in a empire that will be as much Essosi as Westerosi. It's..." she cuts off searching for words. "Look at the changelings, they do not have a set gender, only a preferred one. Should they then be forced to remain in the shape of a man or a woman if they wish to wed? That would go against Scholarum rules by restricting a benign magical ability for no discernible reason." She snorts. "For that matter, consider how Amrelath or Relath would take the notion of restraining shapeshifting on the basis of human cultural norms."

Tyene nods slowly. "I think what all this needs is a bit of a polish. The changes are not motivated by any Valyrian model... perish the thought, no, instead they are meant to cover instances that previous laws did not cover like what Dany mentioned and to respect the privacy and self will of individual citizens." A smile begins to bloom over her face, one that if replicated in ink upon parchment would likely come with the warning: 'beware the Dornish hatching schemes'. "Most of them are going to hear lordly privilege, not citizen rights, and as we have seen with Lord Bracken there will be quite a few who fancy being able to decide upon their own inheritance as they please with the full might of the law and the Legion behind them. By the time they realize the full importance of it many of them will weigh real and present benefits against the potential advantages to returning to how things once were."

"Assuming they could somehow change the law, which is not a power they hold to begin with," you finish grimly. "A forlorn hope opposition might be appealing to those directly interested, like someone making a claim against a theoretical marriage of Lady Shyra, but they would hold no water with most."

What changes do you make to the marriage law of the Empire, systematizing and superseding previous legislation on the matter?

[] Write in

OOC: I decided to make this a write in only vote since writing full proposals would lead to some very complex and long vote options that would get superseded by a write in anyway.
 
Last edited:
So this is only for marriage, not inheritance and long-term tax policies?

Incidentally @Goldfish, instead of picking IM limits for taxation, how about percentages? The limits of each category could be set by the overall incomes of the population. So for example all wealth below the median wealth could be taxed X%, then between the median and the 70% mark it could be taxed Y%, then between 70% and 90% it could be taxed Z%, then between... etc. We'd end up with "and between 99,95% it's taxed 80%, and over that it's taxed 90%".

We'd have to regularly update these numbers (and always announce the new ones a year or two in advance of course) but it seems like a fairer and more flexible system.

And are we taxing income or assets here? Because taxing assets runs into the "my land is worth a lot but doesn't produce much actual revenue for me to pay my taxes with" problem, but taxing only revenue means that stockpiling massive amounts of wealth in the form of land or business shares that don't produce much dividends becomes an issue, granting people huge influence and slightly less huge income (and we're trying to curb the more insane forms of wealth and influence concentration, after all).
 
Last edited:
Yeah, Faerie Dragons could work well, though Adding Gigantean, Sorcerer Creature, and Advanced would push them to CR 14. I would actually be tempted to outright consider it CR 15 without trying to add another template to max it out. The built-in Sorcerer casting from a Faerie Dragon would synergize so well with the Sorcerer Creature template that it makes sense to consider it a +4 rather than +3 CR increase.

I don't think we should try to slap the Telepathic Creature template on Pseudodragons. They only have 2 HD, but would gain access to some pretty hefty SLAs, including Mind Blank. Even on the Mind Dragons, I built them so that the full abilities of the template don't become available until they are adults, with Mind Blank being the last SLA they can use.

Most Alchemical templates are kinda lackluster, but I wouldn't complain about having access to them, if only for the sake of completion and a full toolbox. I don't know when/where we got the Quickling template, now that you mention that. I don't think we actually have it, despite ordering some from the Forge earlier this month. That could be an issue, since we ordered 30 Quickling Vinespawn.

I vaguely remember you guys getting a quickling creature at some point but I can't pinpoint it. I know I used a lot of things like that for action economy.

So this is only for marriage, not inheritance and long-term tax policies?

Yes, the rest will be in the next vote
 
Last edited:
A Union of Laws

Twenty Seventh Day of the Eleventh Month 293 AC

Inheritance has been a headache for every Targaryen king, and likely for every king that came before them down through the ages from the Long Night onward, but you would wager it has never been a concern in quite this manner. With the return of magic, and the opening of the ways to the Elemental Spheres and the cosmos beyond, the world is changed in ways that is no respecter of laws and traditions of humankind, so they too must change. More than that, in your troubles you have seen the ways in which even the most commonplace of restrictions can lead to pain and heartbreak.

Lady Shyra Errol still lives in fear that her affections for Elys Penrose will be revealed and you are not so naive as to think that is the worst such circumstances can lead to. A noble has the protection of his or her name and House, and the wealthy can buy privacy and peace of mind both with silver, at least to a degree, but for the poor or those simply making due, what relief if they should love not as others expect or wish? So you have gathered in your council chamber at this early hour, Dany for her passion and cleverness both, Tyene to speak of the Westerosi perspective of which you are not as acquainted as you might like, Malarys for his legal mind and insight into the workings of the Freehold, and Ser Richard to make sure that if the rest of you build castles in the air at least the cloud will be thick enough underfoot.

"On the matter of marriages that cannot produce offspring by the most common way, the Freefold's law was clear," Malarys begins. "An heir is defined by the will of the one bequeathing whatever title or possession is at stake. Adopting one's nephew to pass over a spendthrift son was common enough that complaints regarding such arrangements became short-hand for uninteresting, unfulfilling work. 'There's a nephew for you to handle' was something of a jest among the Essarian legal counsel of all stripes. This was by no means the full extent of the law on adoption. There were cases of people passing over hundreds of family members to elevate some obscure cousin who had shown exceptional promise. Indeed, one of my mentors encountered a case where the head of a middling noble house elevated his most favored slave to succeed him through adoption, though he was not in the least related. The young man was of the blood of the Dragonlords enough to bond a dragon, so the matter was settled and opposing claims tossed out, though the intrigues that marked that house were still raging when I took my first case forty years after the fact, so I would not call that a wise choice on the part of the patriarch of the time."

"So if someone went to the flesh-crafters for a baby..." Dany began.

"He or she would be discretely checked for mind magic or other compulsions," Malarys interjected dryly, eliciting a laugh from Tyene. "The flesh-smiths were not trusted, and given the philosophies we have discovered they held to and how far they were willing to go following in their wake, I would say neither were they trustworthy." He waves the matter aside, spell-forged rings glittering in the unwavering magelight. "That aside, yes, if magic were required in the conception of a child than he or she would have to be formally adopted by the parents shortly after birth. As for the nature of said parents..."

He shuffles though his papers. "The Freehold and most of its colonies at the time of the Doom recognized unions of two or more citizens who wished to unite their fortunes and lineages as being married, the law did not concern itself with any other quality other than citizenship in good standing. As the usual purpose of marriage was propagation of the bloodline and the passing of inheritance to the new generation, most marriages were not that different from the norm today, though few would gainsay a dragon rider who wished more unusual arrangements.

"The law is still on the books in that form in Volantis, though according to Wisdom Zherys it has been little used over the last two hundred years. In Tyrosh and Myr it has been changed to a more restrictive form, while Lys recognizes a 'lesser form' of marriage between two men or two women." You suspect his disdain is more for unneeded legal complexity, which he has tried to work against ever since becoming Lord Justice, not the unfairness of the treatment that brings a frown to Dany's face.

"That won't be easy to swallow in the Seven Kingdoms, not if we present it as Valyrian law," Tyene notes thoughtfully. "You could throw a bone to the faith and disallow close kin marriages."

"Which would create legal distinctions between different parts of the realm and further deepen cultural cleavages," Dany cuts in with Malarys nodding in agreement. "No one is forcing them to marry any differently than they did before, it only opens the way for other options in an empire that will be as much Essosi as Westerosi. It's..." she cuts off searching for words. "Look at the changelings, they do not have a set gender only a preferred one. Should they then be forced to remain in the shape of a man or a woman if they wish to wed? That would go against Scholarum rules by restricting a benign magical ability for no discernible reason." She snorts. "For that matter, consider how Amrelath or Relath would take the notion of restraining shapeshifting on the basis of human cultural norms."

Tyene nods slowly. "I think what all this needs is a bit of a polish. the changes are not motivated by any Valyrian model... Perish the thought. No, instead they are meant to cover instances that previous laws did not address, like what Dany mentioned and to respect the privacy and self will of individual citizens." A smile begins to bloom over her face, one that if replicated in ink upon parchment would likely come with the warning: 'beware the Dornish hatching schemes'. "Most of them are going to hear lordly privilege, not citizen rights, and as we have seen with Lord Bracken. there will be quite a few who fancy being able to decide upon their own inheritance as they please with the full might of the law and the legion behind them. By the time they realize the full import, many of them will weigh real and present benefits against the potential advantages of returning to how things once were."

"Assuming they could somehow change the law, which is not a power they hold to begin with," you finish grimly. "A forlorn hope opposition might be appealing to those directly interested, like someone making a claim against a theoretical marriage of lady Shyra, but they would hold no water with most."

What changes do you make to the marriage law of the Empire, systematizing and superseding previous legislation on the matter?

[] Write in

OOC: I decided to make this a write in only vote since writing full proposals would lead to some very complex and long vote options that would get superseded by a write in anyway. Not yet edited.
Here's an edited version of the chapter, DP.
 
So this is only for marriage, not inheritance and long-term tax policies?

Incidentally @Goldfish, instead of picking IM limits for taxation, how about percentages? The limits of each category could be set by the overall incomes of the population. So for example all wealth below the median wealth could be taxed X%, then between the median and the 70% mark it could be taxed Y%, then between 70% and 90% it could be taxed Z%, then between... etc. We'd end up with "and between 99,95% it's taxed 80%, and over that it's taxed 90%".

We'd have to regularly update these numbers (and always announce the new ones a year or two in advance of course) but it seems like a fairer and more flexible system.

And are we taxing income or assets here? Because taxing assets runs into the "my land is worth a lot but doesn't produce much actual revenue for me to pay my taxes with" problem, but taxing only revenue means that stockpiling massive amounts of wealth in the form of land or business shares that don't produce much dividends becomes an issue, granting people huge influence and slightly less huge income (and we're trying to curb the more insane forms of wealth and influence concentration, after all).
How about this? Or something like it?

---[] Income Brackets & Annual Tax Rates
----[] Income below Imperial Median = 0%
----[] Imperial Median to +70% Median = 20%
----[] +71% Median to +80% Median = 30%
----[] +81% Median to +100% Median = 40%
----[] +101% Median to +200% Median = 45%
----[] +201% Median to +500% Median = 50%
----[] +501% Median to +2,000% Median = 60%
----[] +2,001% Median to +10,000% Median = 70%
----[] +10,001% Median to +100,000% Median = 80%
----[] +100,001% Median to +1,000,000% Median = 90%
----[] In excess of +1,000,000% = 95%


And for a Property Tax, a flat 1% on assessed value seems fair to me, with value determined periodically (maybe every 5 to 10 years?). Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
And here's the next iteration of my proposed plan, now with a section for property tax and adjustments made to assess income tax based off earnings compared to the Imperial median.

Thoughts and suggestions?

[] Marriage, Death, and Taxes
-[] Clarification of Inheritance:
--[] An individual's children, both those legitimately born within the bounds of a marriage contract and those illegitimately born outside of such a contract, but who were later officially recognized, are considered their legal heirs. This ruling extends to any children one may have legally adopted into their family, but who do not share significant ties of blood relation.
---[] Additionally, an individual has full control over the disbersement of their worldly assets to legal heirs, including the designation of a primary heir to receive inheritable titles of nobility.
-[] Reincarnation Tax:
--[] Upon Reincarnation not sanctioned by the Imperium*, 10% of the value of one's estate is to be paid as a tax to the Imperium.
---[] *State-sanctioned Reincarnation includes any instance of an individual being Reincarnated after falling in service to the Imperium as part of their assigned duties.
-[] Income Tax:
--[] An Income Tax will be applied to all legal entities (private citizens, guilds, merchant consortiums, companies, etc) operating within the Imperium which are not wholly owned and operated by the state, with annual rates determined by the income generated by each entity. Income-based tax brackets and the rates associated with them are subject to periodic adjustment in response to various economic factors, though such adjustments must be announced at least one year in advance of implementation.
---[] Income Brackets & Annual Tax Rates

----[] Income below Imperial Median = 0%
----[] Imperial Median to +70% Median = 20%
----[] +71% Median to +80% Median = 30%
----[] +81% Median to +100% Median = 40%
----[] +101% Median to +200% Median = 45%
----[] +201% Median to +500% Median = 50%
----[] +501% Median to +2,000% Median = 60%
----[] +2,001% Median to +10,000% Median = 70%
----[] +10,001% Median to +100,000% Median = 80%
----[] +100,001% Median to +1,000,000% Median = 90%

----[] In excess of +1,000,000% = 95%
-[] Property Tax:
--[] A 1% Property Tax will be levied against the holdings of all legal entities (private citizens, guilds, merchant consortiums, companies, etc) operating within the Imperium which are not wholly owned and operated by the state if the total assessed value of their properties exceeds 1,000 IM.
-[] Marriage:
--[] Marriage is defined as the legal union between two or more consenting parties, each of of whom is considered an adult of their species by Imperial law.

---[] In addition to being of age, to be considered capable of giving consent one must be free of magical compulsion or possession, and of sufficient intelligence (i.e. sentience) to comprehend the basic legal obligations inherent to the marriage contract. Consent cannot be given under duress.
 
Last edited:
How about this? Or something like it?

---[] Income Brackets & Annual Tax Rates
----[] Income below Imperial Median = 0%
----[] Imperial Median to +70% Median = 20%
----[] +71% Median to +80% Median = 30%
----[] +81% Median to +100% Median = 40%
----[] +101% Median to +200% Median = 45%
----[] +201% Median to +500% Median = 50%
----[] +501% Median to +2,000% Median = 60%
----[] +2,001% Median to +10,000% Median = 70%
----[] +10,001% Median to +100,000% Median = 80%
----[] +100,001% Median to +1,000,000% Median = 90%
----[] In excess of +1,000,000% = 95%


And for a Property Tax, a flat 1% on assessed value seems fair to me, with value determined periodically (maybe every 5 to 10 years?). Thoughts?
Those brackets are all way too low. I don't want to repeat myself too much, but if the goal we're trying to achieve is to manage massive wealth accumulation this kind of stuff shouldn't kick in until we've clearly reached a point where they can cause a problem. A highly skilled crafter can and should be making significantly more than a median that includes a large number of unskilled laborers. This kind of thing is a "fairness" tax not an emergency pressure release.

Could we try to base it on state income instead? Not sure how to sell it to people, but a more reasonable measure of "too wealthy" could be your relative ability to outbid the state.
 
Set the bar at 500000 IM. Any one over pays 60% tax. Seems pretty simple.

You could raise a decent sized army with thay much money, which challanges the intrest of the state. So we quash that.
 
Those brackets are all way too low. I don't want to repeat myself too much, but if the goal we're trying to achieve is to manage massive wealth accumulation this kind of stuff shouldn't kick in until we've clearly reached a point where they can cause a problem. A highly skilled crafter can and should be making significantly more than a median that includes a large number of unskilled laborers. This kind of thing is a "fairness" tax not an emergency pressure release.
Instead of just saying, "no, that won't work", how about making some suggestions to those numbers?
Could we try to base it on state income instead? Not sure how to sell it to people, but a more reasonable measure of "too wealthy" could be your relative ability to outbid the state.
That's just needlessly complex.
 
How about this? Or something like it?

---[] Income Brackets & Annual Tax Rates
----[] Income below Imperial Median = 0%
----[] Imperial Median to +70% Median = 20%
----[] +71% Median to +80% Median = 30%
----[] +81% Median to +100% Median = 40%
----[] +101% Median to +200% Median = 45%
----[] +201% Median to +500% Median = 50%
----[] +501% Median to +2,000% Median = 60%
----[] +2,001% Median to +10,000% Median = 70%
----[] +10,001% Median to +100,000% Median = 80%
----[] +100,001% Median to +1,000,000% Median = 90%
----[] In excess of +1,000,000% = 95%

I'm fine with this.

And for a Property Tax, a flat 1% on assessed value seems fair to me, with value determined periodically (maybe every 5 to 10 years?). Thoughts?
This is an idea that sounds great in theory, but that's absolute hell to try IRL. Even in developed countries (1960s France) the assessments were a storm of legal challenges, accusations of corruption and insider trading, and a million ploys to raise/lower land value by building or trashing stuff at certain times.

I'd just say "a flat 1% on assessed value for people with a total property worth of X amount or more". This will meant that we don't have to assess every small property holder, and also means that a poor worker who takes a loan to buy a house doesn't immediately lose it because his disposable income is lower than 1% of the house's value.

Those brackets are all way too low. I don't want to repeat myself too much, but if the goal we're trying to achieve is to manage massive wealth accumulation this kind of stuff shouldn't kick in until we've clearly reached a point where they can cause a problem. A highly skilled crafter can and should be making significantly more than a median that includes a large number of unskilled laborers. This kind of thing is a "fairness" tax not an emergency pressure release.
A 20% or less tax rate is honestly really low though. Not just compared to taday's rates, but also when you remember that our state already has relatively few taxes (even for the period, this was established a while ago IC) and that things like VAT don't exist. We've also gotten rid of most tariffs (by removing the borders!).

Could we try to base it on state income instead? Not sure how to sell it to people, but a more reasonable measure of "too wealthy" could be your relative ability to outbid the state.
Considering how ridiculously rich the state is, if someone is that rich we've already failed.
 
-[] Property Tax:
--[] A 1% tax on the assessed value of property will be levied on an annual basis. Property values will be assessed periodically, between every five and ten years, by trained Imperial agents. The property tax rate is subject to periodic adjustment, though such adjustments must be announced at least three years in advance of implementation.
This is a terrible idea and it will fill the court with endless battles (and there's enough cases to sort through each year without purposefully creating a constant source of legal challenges).
 
I'd just say "a flat 1% on assessed value for people with a total property worth of X amount or more". This will meant that we don't have to assess every small property holder, and also means that a poor worker who takes a loan to buy a house doesn't immediately lose it because his disposable income is lower than 1% of the house's value.
What should the X amount be, in your opinion?
This is a terrible idea and it will fill the court with endless battles (and there's enough cases to sort through each year without purposefully creating a constant source of legal challenges).
Are you saying there should be no property tax, or should I change the language and rate?
 
Instead of just saying, "no, that won't work", how about making some suggestions to those numbers?

That's just needlessly complex.
Sorry, I just got to work, can't really post. Should have waited until I had a minute to be more specific.

I don't think something like a progressive tax starting at 20-30% of red scale holdings income for individuals would be too complicated or unreasonable. A single person making over 20% of a state run holding company's revenue is probably making enough to be a potential problem. I just don't know how to convince anyone that it's acceptable IC. In any case, the floor for this tax applying should be so high that it effectively doesn't apply to anyone currently. No one has had the time to accumulate the kind of wealth that we're worried about challenging us. It will also make it easier to put this law on the books it if doesn't apply to anyone, and easier to actually enforce if it's been on the books for years by the time anyone thinks to complain.
 
or should I change the language and rate?
This, mostly.

Edit: I have work starting in fifteen minutes so I don't really have time to argue specifics, but the value of property should be consistent enough that tax evasion schemes involving property devaluation are worth more to the possessor of the property than simply paying the taxes (or roughly equal in the case where the property is generating the vast proportion of their income, like commodity production rural or otherwise).
 
Last edited:
Suggestions for fixing it?

-[] Property Tax:
--[] A 1% tax on the assessed value of property will be levied on an annual basis. Property values will be assessed periodically, between every five and ten years, by trained Imperial agents.

Or maybe this?

-[] Property Tax:
--[] A 1% Property Tax will be levied against the holdings of all legal entities (private citizens, guilds, merchant consortiums, companies, etc) operating within the Imperium which are not wholly owned and operated by the state if the total assessed value of their properties exceeds 1,000 IM.
 
@Goldfish
Another option for the Property Tax would not be to tax the property itself, but instead our services to it.
The adjacent streets being cleaned and repaired after the use through their people, carriages and animals? That's a tax.
The water they draw and the dirty water they put back in our sewer system? That's a tax.
And as soon as we have garbage collection (or do we have that already), that's a tax too.

That way we don't have to judge the value of the property at all, and charge by other, easier to determine factors.
 
@Goldfish
Another option for the Property Tax would not be to tax the property itself, but instead our services to it.
The adjacent streets being cleaned and repaired after the use through their people, carriages and animals? That's a tax.
The water they draw and the dirty water they put back in our sewer system? That's a tax.
And as soon as we have garbage collection (or do we have that already), that's a tax too.

That way we don't have to judge the value of the property at all, and charge by other, easier to determine factors.
That's edging toward writing an actual tax code. Really hoping to keep this simple.
 
Back
Top