- Location
- United States
And if they betray us they will die as rebels. Brienne, if she has the misfortune to fall in that category, will share the same fate.
Fine.
Last edited:
A Sword Without a Hilt: A Song of Ice and Fire/D&D 3.5 Crossover
- Thread starter DragonParadox
- Start date
-
- Tags
- a song of ice and fire a sword without a hilt d&d 3.5 dungeons & dragons 100% high octane dragon fuel ave corvidae battle action dragon diplomacy best sister bureaucromancy delicious soul-stuff dragon dreams come true dragon ta'veren greatest uncle hubris is a coward's word in defiance of gods and men mammon's folly mutually assured mage's disjunction qm murderhobo top tier coatl
I agree with Goldfish. Showing open hostility to the Seven is not a great way to make diplomatic avenues in most of Westeros and offering Resurrections right off the bat every time we don't like something about a current heir opens up a whole other can of worms.
[X] Goldfish
[X] Goldfish
Not quite. From the Uniila entry:
Scroll Mastery (Su)
All uniilas possess Scribe Scroll as a bonus feat. An uniila is treated as knowing all spells of 6th level or lower in the Pathfinder RPG Core Rulebook and can create scrolls of any of those spells.
*rolls spellcraft for Viserys*
Though you guys are in luck he knows it naturally and can use mythic arcane to copy it.
- Location
- ?????????
Oh yeah I would love for them to do that. Our legionaries could take up that land afterwards. You can never have too much when it comes to legions.
- Location
- Germany
[X] Duesal
In my view those that can't follow us above the Seven are already enemies, they just don't know it yet.
But letting a thunderstorm hit every single sept in the Stormlands with lightning and flooding will certainly help.
In my view those that can't follow us above the Seven are already enemies, they just don't know it yet.
- Location
- United States
Thank you, maxed spellcraft.
Rebel lords are both convenient and inconvenient. On one hand we have to deal with the mess, but on the other we have a casus belli to take everything from them and hand it off to loyal lords.
Granted, rare will be the lord stupid enough to rebel against a Mythic Red Dragon Sorcerer. It's basically natural selection at that point.
- Location
- Germany
I'd say the outright rebels are the lesser problem.
Annoying are the lords who drag their feet when it comes to following orders and implementing our directives.
You can't just burn those without antagonizing a whole bunch of other lords.
Edit: The Tyrells are worse than the Starks,inthat sense.
- Location
- ?????????
Oh right. That's two gods to whom we have promised that we will do harm to the Seven. Yikes...
Edit: No really what the hell is this? Do we honestly think that the chosen of the Seven are going to let us destroy every sept in the Stormlands?
Last edited:
- Location
- Germany
No, but 99% of them.
Lucan is not as mobile as we are, he can't protect more than one or two septs by anymeasure except fighting us.
And I deeply want him to do that.
tarrangar
Fat arctic chicken
That was kind of my point, divinely empowered or not all Lords can rebel, just because Brienne is a Paladin, don't mean she's more or less likely to do so.
tarrangar
Fat arctic chicken
We didn't agree to that pact, we made a counteroffer, where we would make him the sole god in Storms End, and build him new temples.
- Location
- United States
Normal lords don't have a god in their head.
We did agree to that pact. The septs of the Stormlands are going to be hit with precision lightning strikes under the cover of a storm.
- Location
- Germany
No, lightning for all Septs was definitly part of the final deal.
We haggled him down from a greater storm to surgical strikes, to spare the smallfolk from the storm's fury, but the septs still go.
tarrangar
Fat arctic chicken
No we didn't, here's the final agreement.
We have to build temples to him, we don't have to destroy the temples of the Seven.
We kept the option of doing pinpoint lightning strikes on the Septs in the vote, if our relationship with the Seven deteriorated, but the Storm god decided to take the deal, without requiring us to destroy the Seven's temples.
Last edited:
- Location
- ?????????
This was the winning vote. IE we could do it after seeing how the situation has evolved. Which I can already tell you won't evolve well.
tarrangar
Fat arctic chicken
That was the winning vote, but it wasn't the bargain that was struck, we must have rolled well on diplomacy, because the Storm god dropped any notion of destroying the Seven's temples from the pact entirely.
- Location
- ?????????
You know what? We should ask DP
@DragonParadox with the pact with the Storm God was it all the things in the winning vote plus the Stannis conversion or just Stannis converting and temples in Storms End being destroyed?
True, mind he would not be opposed to it, it's just that not doing it is no longer a deal-breaker.
- Location
- ?????????
Oh hmm I am honestly still tempted to do it. He would grant a boon for this correct?
- Location
- United States
I'm tempted as well.
egoo
Totally Not Creating Problems Where None Existed
- Location
- Russia
Me three.
Goldfish
Friendly Spider-Fish Abomination
- Location
- Formerly of the Far Realm
Just a reminder that my vote doesn't preclude us from offering to Resurrect Selwyn's son. It simply gives Brienne the opportunity first to choose whether she wishes to be the heir, if she is willing to hold to her oath and obey our laws.
- Location
- ?????????
[X] Duesal
Edit: I would prefer it if a separation of church and state was a thing.
Edit: I would prefer it if a separation of church and state was a thing.
Last edited:
A contested vote with no one upset on either side. That's nice to see.