Only if you give him more then the pize is worth.
That's why it's more trouble than it's worth. We're already kind of stretched thin on the prizes.
Understandable, I'm just a fan of the idea that we'll have a bit of a balance here. dorfs don't have to show up and I don't care, but it'd be nice to have Drow/High Elves, and color dragons/metal dragons if only for the natural counterpoint they are to each other. What with how much lore there is about those groups constantly trying to fuck each other over.
Can we please not do the multi-dip into four or more classes to min-max them? I hate that way of building characters. It's one thing to have multiple PRCs, because high level D&D characters that go straight through their class are subpar, but just grabbing one or two levels from multiple classes makes my brain hurt. I'm weird like that.So I've been thinking of how to make a sneaky magical rogue work. Assuming the volley rule makes the usual internet wisdom impossible (get high sneak attack and CL and then spam Elemental Darts), then here is my suggestion:
Go Beguiler for skill points and sneakiness. At level 5, go Unseen Seer for 2 levels to grab Hunter's Eye, and then go into Arcane Trickster all day (it has faster sneak attack progression than Unseen Seer - but maybe Unseen Seer is still worth it for the class features which are great for sneaks and pump Hunter's Eye CL faster).
Now the issue here is that unless you can persist Hunter's Eye through WBL or DP is generous, you only qualify for Arcane Trickster while Hunter's Eye is active. In that case, I suggest something like Beguiler 5/Rogue 1/Unseen Seer 2/ add in more Unseen Seer or Arcane Trickster levels until you reach level 20.
This build lacks BaB, but you have WBL (and probably UMD) to get access to Divine Power anyway. Then grab a collar of umbral metamorphosis for HiPS (it's very cheap and very good!), and probably enchanted melee weapons ("speed" is a good property to have. See a rogue handbook for others) and wands of grave strike.
There are plenty of reasons that a planet within the Material Plane might not have a diverse population of sentient mortal D&D races. It even makes more sense that way.Understandable, I'm just a fan of the idea that we'll have a bit of a balance here. dorfs don't have to show up and I don't care, but it'd be nice to have Drow/High Elves, and color dragons/metal dragons if only for the natural counterpoint they are to each other. What with how much lore there is about those groups constantly trying to fuck each other over.
Can we please not do the multi-dip into four or more classes to min-max them? I hate that way of building characters. It's one thing to have multiple PRCs, because high level D&D characters that go straight through their class are subpar, but just grabbing one or two levels from multiple classes makes my brain hurt. I'm weird like that.
There are plenty of reasons that a planet within the Material Plane might not have a diverse population of sentient mortal D&D races. It even makes more sense that way.
it gets a little grim derp though if all species we find are evil aligned. Not saying they all are but if a pattern starts it could get a bit annoying.Personally I have no issues with the Races in this story. There are a million cookie cutter fantasy settings who mugged the works of Tolkien in a back alley for thier racial composition and fluff. If I want to read yet another story about the wise and eternal elves being slowly replaced by the race of men while the Dwarves dig variable amounts of both greedily and deep in thier mountain homes, I can find that with basically no effort.
The specific mash up of Martin's heavily threatening lovecraftian fluff, traditional D&D stuff, and DP's own excellent worldbuilding is unique to this story, and I'd prefer it if it wasn't papered over with Faerun clone #582, thanks.
What, you mean over-dramatic pseudo-philosophers with a martyr complex?
I would not inflict that on you guys.
I've read some of the series, it's not that bad, just people making bad OCs of him that's bad.
But seriously they will probably try to betray us within seconds so we should plan for that.
Speaking of which, does anyone have anything to say of the vote?
Anyone have anything to add? Counter-proposals?
Votes?
Inserted tally.
I'd appreciate it if you leaned more heavily on the virtues of them sticking around and why they aught to sign up with us. I get a bit nervous with so much emphasis on them having the freedom to go wherever they want, when we explicitly brought them back to recruit them. Those spiders were not cheap.
"My Companions and I"
If there's a reason for this grammar choice I'm all ears, but otherwise it's just a bit too informal for the situation imo.
Keep in mind we have to give a fig leaf's proof of the fact that we don't demand service, and no one would lightly just walk away after being saved from a fate worse than death with an obvious debt hanging over their head, for the perceived enmity that might earn if nothing else.
These guys are going to be consummate plotters just as a matter of who they were often dealing with. They'll see if the deal is really as good as we say. When it proves to be better, if only because whatever they ask for that we believe more than agreeable, we actually deliver on with no catch, they will be too confused to betray us.
Ask them a small overview of their day to day life, no need to go in depth on screen about it, just as a way to connect and to help find the words (i.e. a boost to our Diplo roll), to express the intention of your vote in a way that will resonate with them.Speaking of which, does anyone have anything to say of the vote?
Anyone have anything to add? Counter-proposals?
Votes?
Inserted tally.