- Location
- Germany
we haven't decided on a sealed transport. some of us are against it. a grav transport filled with VGW is going to have multiple grav shields deflecting stray blasts that find them inside there Holo field anyway, which is more effective than a chassis of medium armor against most of the fire that doesn't just miss us in the first place.
I think whole point behind upgrading armor at all was to put some armor over the engine.
overall the people obsessing over this are applying a disproportionate amount of value to this marginal addition to our defensibility which would only have an impact a handful of times a century at great detriment to overall combat effectiveness during that century. these individuals need to drop the headcanon of perfect defense and the ability to field an army which takes as close to absolutely zero risks as we can manage and still command an effective fighting force.
We very much want sealed transports, they are pretty much the best we can do for assault transport.
And the medium armor is still helpful even on an open-top transport, because it keeps the vehicle itself some better armor.
Light armor is still something that I expect most infantry scale weapons to being able to go through to some degree.
Better armor also protects better against explosions and aoe damage which again needed for the sealed transport.
And why it gets brought up ?
Because we are currently doing the chassis designs, and they won't change much after this.
Overall giving up the medium armor for an extra system slot that likely will end up being a single-ranged weapon is not worth it.
We can change the slot usage in the design phase if needed. We can't add armor there.
So far you are the one that downplays the medium armor quite strongly by saying it is a marginal addition to the overall defense.