Personally, I would feel much safer about this assumption if we did not have a probable incoming Everchosen in the next 10-30 years.the next (human) generation of arcane scholars can come back to it.
Personally, I would feel much safer about this assumption if we did not have a probable incoming Everchosen in the next 10-30 years.the next (human) generation of arcane scholars can come back to it.
Personally, I would feel much safer about this assumption if we did not have a probable incoming Everchosen in the next 10-30 years.
One of the things that was mentioned was that river spirits could be relied upon to attack anyone who tried to steal the flow of waystone energy from them.I think we could actually add a few new waystone components, if we wanted to.
Information and Defense are two pretty big categories that could see straightforward uses. The use of information is clear; some way to know if a waystone is being messed with without having to be near it would be a life saver. This wouldn't normally be something so casually suggested, but given that the whole point of waystones is sending stuff down to other waystones you kind of have to admire the synergy.
A straightforward on/off life signal could feed into a map. Just, a simple map with little on/off dots of light on it. It's technology that feels like it existed back in our Stirland days, and the utility of not having to do mapping actions twice is obvious.
River spirits could also be bribed to provide updates about the state of the stones in their care, if we ever decide to rely on them.
Alternatively, we could use a variant of the spell to call Vazila, spirits which serve any sorcerer in Kislev for the purpose of letting them know if someone is about to steal their horse. (Yes, there is a set of spirits with that specific job and any caster of any lore can learn the spell to employ them. It's an entirely sincere suggestion.)
As for defenses, one of the things that bugs me the most about leaving waystones out in the wild is that there are these big Beastmen Ogre things that will just steal them. The whole waystone, just pick it up, because they're blind to the physical world and it's the only object they can see. Also they eat the souls of wizards specifically, which I also hate, so this serves a dual purpose.
Anyhow, attaching an apparition that hates dark magic to a waystone with the instruction that anything that damages the waystone is basically doing Dark Magic would result in most people who damage waystones discovering what happens when their insides become their outsides.
Dark mages are scary, but usually notably weak to something just eating them out of the blue. It won't always work, but it can't hurt.
This is already a very long-term project. It's not going to be finished next year. As-is, we have a limited staff of magical experts, not an immense staff of magical dabblers. Therefore, an option currently requiring experts whose drawback is negated over the long term is the ideal starting point for this project.Why on Mallus are people so interested in the reverse-engineered storage?
It adds a huge extra source of complexity and uncertainty, as well as potentially seriously limiting deployment.
What is it that so many see as the selling point of it?
Future action cost is also a good reason to start with the model that gets better over time, in the whole 'best time to plant a tree' sense. If we get the political capital to push a large-scale effort and do in fact find that we're bottlenecked on skill, then we can revise with cheaper models... or perhaps the Thorek will go design the Dwarf-only Waystone model on his own or something, saving us the trouble of arranging it. My point is that there's no rush to build cheap models, and a great deal of rush to do reverse-engineering ASAP.I've seen the worries about spending future AP designing new models of Waystone dropping up in thread, and although I'm not sure if this argument has been made already, on the off chance that it hasn't I feel this is worth saying:
Almost inevitably, new models of Waystone will have to be designed, but we don't need to be around for it, because the Waystone designing cabal is more than capable of doing so without us.
Maybe not as easily and diplomatically without Mathilde standing between them acting as a soothing intermediary, but now that the project had probably worked I really can't see them just… refusing, if they feel the needs arise.
They're all extremely capable and experienced adults, most of them magnitudes older than Mathilde will ever be. The Project will soon, reasonably, be as complete as it will ever be, and so there's no moral nor practical demand to linger if we really do not wish to.
Of course, there's nothing wrong with it if we do! It's just- we shouldn't feel the need to make a one side fits all Waystone that will work forever, everywhere, kind of well enough today, especially if it sacrificed a great deal. We, or other people, or the next (human) generation of arcane scholars can now always return to the drawing board if the need ever does arise.
One of my long term goals for the project is that we should figure out designs that the Wizards, Kislev, Laurelorn Elves, and Dwarves can all build independently of one-another, because the more people who can expand the network, the less likely the network's expansion is to be disrupted by political kerfuffles in the future.None of that stops us from churning out a different design next turn; there's compelling reasons to also make simpler cheaper less diverse models later... but for now, there's a legitimate presentation aspect to consider. The reverse engineering prototype will be better-than-the-Golden-Age amazing, and will gain momentum over time as the development process accelerates, especially if it's the first thing we're showing off and all the fancy Elven Archmages who want in on the new hotness have a look at it. Lesser waystones can be employed later in a supporting role, after more nations are signing onto the project and we have more resources to throw around anyways. For now, though, we're capped on volume, not skill, so we should show off our skill in order to gain the prestige we need to arrange volume.
The lowest common denominator of every polity is non magical citizens.One of my long term goals for the project is that we should figure out designs that the Wizards, Kislev, Laurelorn Elves, and Dwarves can all build independently of one-another, because the more people who can expand the network, the less likely the network's expansion is to be disrupted by political kerfuffles in the future.
That's a good point. Combined with Boney saying the reverse engineered one is more powerful, I'll vote for it too, then.This is already a very long-term project. It's not going to be finished next year. As-is, we have a limited staff of magical experts, not an immense staff of magical dabblers. Therefore, an option currently requiring experts whose drawback is negated over the long term is the ideal starting point for this project.
One of my long term goals for the project is that we should figure out designs that the Wizards, Kislev, Laurelorn Elves, and Dwarves can all build independently of one-another, because the more people who can expand the network, the less likely the network's expansion is to be disrupted by political kerfuffles in the future.
I have posted 3 plans that every polity can build themselves. It is in the thread somewhere. My plan is to pick from them next turn.But by god, I wish to see if we can make a mostly Dwarven-reliant Waystone sometime within the next few turns.
I'd been going for riverine first, and just putting up with whatever other foolishness people wanted to add, because that seemed more likely to win, and potentially able to open up avenues of research that might bring the Electors onboard.I have posted 3 plans that every polity can build themselves. It is in the thread somewhere. My plan is to pick from them next turn.
Either fully by themselves, or 4/5 components of it, IMO. It would not be a horrible idea to incentivize the polities to rely on one another a bit more, at least for the amount of time it'd take for them to experiment a bit and do that final fifth component on their own.I have posted 3 plans that every polity can build themselves. It is in the thread somewhere. My plan is to pick from them next turn.
Keep It Simple. This is our first prototype. Add the cool extra features later.
but the necessity of making sure each of the components will work in harmony indefinitely means that each one would take just as much effort as this one will.
Well, there's one option that might be gradually improved if it wins, but for the rest of it, +100. We aren't just prototyping, we're building the first functional model to put in places that need it.The framing of these products as a prototypes isn't a particularly helpful one I think, it sort of implies incremental improvement to future builds which basically isn't going to happen.