Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
While I know we won't do it I can help but imagine Mathilde just dropping a Chandelier on the Tsar as the assassination method or some other comical method.
 
Seeing this, I assumed you were going to suggest assassinating the Tzar by slipping the acorn into his breakfast or something. Admittedly, death by having a tree grow through your stomach in the middle of the day or what have you is something that's unlikely to be traced back to the Grey College…
The Asari showing up afterward would also clearly make sure no one suspects Mathilde.
 
Step 1: Get hold of Wyvern venom somehow (I reckon it's doable but if not some potent spider venom will do)

Step 2: Get the Tzar to go attack some goblins

Step 3: While he's fighting goblins, sneak up while invisible and stab him with a goblin blade coated in wyvern venom.

He's killed fighting greenskins by a greenskin blade coated in a venom greenskins often use. Everyone goes 'Yeah, seems legit'


As for where to find the venom, if we can't get it from the Grey college without attracting attention (I reckon they probably have poisons that can be made available with oversight ranging from 'We need to know everything' for apprentices/journeymen to 'we don't want to know anything' for lord/lady magisters) then a disguised Mathilde can probably find some at Barak Varr or Marienburg. They're huge trading cities after all. If all else fails we could try extracting it from the source as a last resort
 
Last edited:
Ever since there hasn't been another Daemon Prince of Chaos Undivided, and the fact that the Everchosen is always crowned by Be'lakor might suggest that They don't even invest the Everchosen with the blessings of all four Gods, They just give him a chunk that they originally gave to Be'lakor.
Crowned by him sure, but definitely not made. We see a Chaos Lord almost get turned into an Everchosen during a phenomenally successful campaign against the Empire, but he turned it down and let himself get killed by the Empire because he wanted to die as his own man. Be'lakor wasn't anywhere near him.

That might explain why it took so long for Everchosen to start appearing - because it took that long for Be'lakor to finally submit to the Chaos Gods after being discorporated by the creation of the Great Vortex.
That'd make Sigmar and the Everchosen a coincidence. It so happens that the first Everchosen in history pops up around the same time and place as a Nagash-breaking, dwarf-befriending future god-king?
 
Crowned by him sure, but definitely not made. We see a Chaos Lord almost get turned into an Everchosen during a phenomenally successful campaign against the Empire, but he turned it down and let himself get killed by the Empire because he wanted to die as his own man. Be'lakor wasn't anywhere near him.
And who is to say that Mortkin accepting the offer from the Chaos Gods wouldn't have then seen Be'lakor appear in front of him to crown him?
 
Maybe there's a significant power jump between "particularly talented/successful Chaos Lord" and "actually the Everchosen". Symbolism and resonances matter when there's this much magic involved, so the crowning might bestow a good chunk of power on its own. Though it does put a hole in the theory that the Chaos gods refuse to give anyone significant amounts of power beyond what was given to Be'lakor if Mortkin was blessed enough.

Speaking of Mortkin, what are the chances he's in the Everchosen bowl here? He very obviously fits, but I haven't seen any mention of things that could be him yet.
 
Last edited:
To my knowledge, secret plots of murder rarely end well for either the country or the one who ursurps the throne.

Even though in this case, if it were an even tally I might vote yes because of short-term necessity. Because it is not even, I am free to vote my conscience without fear of a civil war.

[x] No
 
I would like to advocate simplicity when it comes to the assassination, because I'm a bit terrified a more complicated plot could end up an accidental ritual to Chaos or something. Alberic's exaggerated murders of the Unfähigers comes to mind.
 
Speaking of Mortkin, what are the chances he's in the Everchosen bowl here? He very obviously fits, but I haven't seen any mention of things that could be him yet.
Canon-wise Mortkin has his own fortress apparently real far north in the Wastes- like, within spitting distance of the Polar Gate. He was a 1-percenter among Chaos Lords.

So if he's doing anything it's probably consolidating among the Chaos Warriors and the northernmost tribes.

He only came south in canon because of his birth village being destroyed, there's no reason to think he's had a similar impetus. Unless Aislinn razes the wrong Norscan village or something.

(Aislinn razes villages up-and-down the Sea of Claws and never sees even a hint of retaliation, the Empire leads one (1) reprisal campaign against the Norscans and gets the Glottkin and a Chaos invasion, Elves get all the luck)
 
(Aislinn razes villages up-and-down the Sea of Claws and never sees even a hint of retaliation, the Empire leads one (1) reprisal campaign against the Norscans and gets the Glottkin and a Chaos invasion, Elves get all the luck)
I'm pretty sure those were separate reprisal campaigns, the one that destroyed Mortkin's home village was done by Ostland and the one that killed the Glottkin's parents was by Nordland.
 
I would like to advocate simplicity when it comes to the assassination, because I'm a bit terrified a more complicated plot could end up an accidental ritual to Chaos or something. Alberic's exaggerated murders of the Unfähigers comes to mind.
Pretty sure you can't accidentally perform a Chaos ritual with a single political assassination, no matter how convoluted the plot is. Political assassinations happen all the time and it's not Chaos. Hell, the Grey College has assassination in its portfolio and there's no indication that Accidental Chaos Ritual is a outcome they seek to avoid, which I'd call indicative considering how absolutely paranoid the Colleges in general are about all things Chaotic and Dhar-related.
 
Ironically enough though, the first example that springs to mind, seidr, was very much a thing restricted to women by white men. Usually by ostracizing or outlawing the ergi who learned it, despite the saga's example of Odin.

I think this might be where the trope of manly men with swords vs effeminate magic users that came to fruition in Conan might have started?
Maybe, though my impression is that some of the magicians were pretty hardcore individuals, both in Howard's work and in what came after him in the same setting. Sure, they generally weren't as honorable, swole, fiery, and otherwise masculine-coded as Conan himself, but then... who is?

To an extent, Howard (and some other classic works) suffer from retroactive stereotyping; we attribute to them what we expect to have seen in them.

Also, the conviction that magic is dishonorable, evil, or "cheating" probably isn't restricted to cultures where magic is formally gendered. It enables all kinds of shenanigans that nobody would enjoy having to deal with, and it's often conceived of as being particularly useful for things like poisonings, subtly weakening things, and calling up evil powers, which would be dishonorable and contemptible in their own right.
 
Last edited:
Huh, I know there are spells that *affect* the mind, but I don't know that I've seen any outright mind control spells? I'm not even sure what wind that would be.
 
Dhar, probably, given its whole theme of domination and corruption. Forcibly twisting things (including sapient minds) against their natural order is very on-point for it.
 
Last edited:
Definitely Dhar. It doesn't fit the thematics of any Wind, and it is the sort of thing that you'd be doing with brute force and will, not finesse and skill.
 
Back
Top