Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
Heh, if there was that level of scrutiny then poor Journeywoman Mathilde would've never gotten away with embezzling. Now that I think of it, maybe paying off all of your loans on time is the real red flag... :V
Well that's only if you are late with the payment. Mathilde never was late and the college always got the correct amount, it was the stirland treasury that got hoodwinked.
 
Isha is married to Kurnous. I think End Times added Asuryan being married to Lileath, but Isha and Asuryan are definitely not married.
I was sure that Lileath being married to Asuryan was a thing before the End Times, but it turns out that's not the case. It doesn't really matter for the quest's purposes though, since in DL Asuryan is indeed married to Lileath:
"Nethu," you say. "Son of Asuryan, you said? Isn't Asuryan supposed to be married?"

"And Ulthuani belief would tell you that when Ereth Khial attempted to seduce Him, He rebuffed her and remained loyal to Lileath
 
Huh, could have sworn they were paired up. My mistake.
You might have been influenced by this quote from Boney:
Human scholar: "And according to Loremaster Beldryal's The Flame Eternal, Asuryan made the world and Isha created the Elves, right?"
Asuryan creating the world and Isha giving it life very much fits with the idea of them being paired up, but they weren't. In fact, Isha is Lileath's mother.
 
A part I found funny is that the description for Lord Magisters in the 2E Career Compendium Page 231 is that while LMs don't pay a tithe, they're the ones who make sure the tithes are paid on time now:

"Note: Wizard Lords no longer pay dues to their Order. They are, however, charged with preserving the purity of their order, rooting out Chaos worshippers, and ensuring the Orders receive the respect (and monies) due to them."

What a vicious cycle. You used to pay taxes, now you're the one making sure the taxes are paid.

I think it's different in DL. Only one LM is in charge of taxes in the Grey Order, Wilhelmine Bucht, and her support staff, which is most likely Perpetuals.
... Now I want Mathilde to get a letter from the college telling her it's her 6 month stint of cruising along the country side and hitting the late Magisters and journeyman for their fees.
Imagine, your a plucky Grey Wizard helping a band of adventures to destroy a evil in a Forrest somewhere. And through the epic battle you see a lady on a shadow horse killing her way through the hordes to tell you you owe the college 250 copper pieces, here's your receipt.

Mathilde: You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become a villain.
Wilhelmine: It is not that bad.
Mathilde: Taxation is theft!
Wlihelmine: Aren't you a Randalite? Shouldn't you be fine with theft?
Mathilde: I am but Tax Collection is even more insidious! It is the corrupts honest good honest theft! You are the most terrible kind of thief!
Wlihelmine: Thank you for the complement but I believe you already have a girlfriend.
 
Last edited:
"Verdan, Kurn-ath, but not Cadai..." Two of the three parts of the sigil of Kurnous, Elven God of the Hunt. You look up, and stop walking.

Or perhaps you're looking at this wrong. As Cython said: do two Kings share a Kingdom? What if the crown is absent because Taal set it aside?
"Are you suggesting that Taal and Kurnous are the same?" you ask directly. Cryptic asides are a lot more fun when you're the one making them.

Asarnil smiles archly. "Are you going to suggest that he isn't? That there's two horned Gods of the hunt, two Kings of the wilderness, two husbands to the Goddess of fertility and bounty?"

"Rhya isn't Isha," Deathfang interrupts around a mouthful of beef.
So, here's one perspective on divine relationships that I haven't found discussed yet:

If Rhya isn't Isha, and Karnos, the God of sneaking out to have fun in the woods, who coincidentally shares two out of three sigils with Kurnous in a way that suggests a king without his crown, is hanging around in Taal's backyard . . . . that looks like Rhya has some explaining to do. :V:V
 
As I was rereading I came to the part where we invented RoW and that made me wonder about our present allies, do Ice Witches add to their lore and invent new spells? I mean for one Liljana did not seem to be that surprised when we pulled out 'the fog trick' but that might just mean she knows College Magisters do that, not necessarily that it is something her order does as well.

And then it occurred to me that might be a good indicator of what is arcane and what is divine lore that is at least halfway objective. If you are part of an arcane tradition, even one that is supported by a god then of course you can make new spells and adept those you see others cast, but if you are a priest and your power comes strictly from a god, then it is up to them what miracles get handed out, the list of spells is thus really resistant to change.

Granted you would likely need better records than the empire has to do comparative analyses in order to see if for instance Ice Witches or Damsels use new spells (they apparently do not even have records to check if there were Golden Hounds in the Great War Against Chaos) but still it is something that might theoretically be done in the future.
 
Well that's only if you are late with the payment. Mathilde never was late and the college always got the correct amount, it was the stirland treasury that got hoodwinked.
I mean, Mathilde did get a meeting with Wilhelmine that one time precisely because of her giving the correct amount every time. Mostly because it was an unbelievable amount for a Journeywoman, thanks to the sales of Asarnil's book, but still.
 
I mean, Mathilde did get a meeting with Wilhelmine that one time precisely because of her giving the correct amount every time. Mostly because it was an unbelievable amount for a Journeywoman, thanks to the sales of Asarnil's book, but still.
The first time she met Wilhelmine was actually the much, much bigger payout when she conned a good portion of the K8P Expedition mercenaries.
 
So, here's one perspective on divine relationships that I haven't found discussed yet:

If Rhya isn't Isha, and Karnos, the God of sneaking out to have fun in the woods, who coincidentally shares two out of three sigils with Kurnous in a way that suggests a king without his crown, is hanging around in Taal's backyard . . . . that looks like Rhya has some explaining to do. :V:V
The Earthmother archetype is like that
 
Well, yeah. Kings are the ones to care about loyalty, bloodlines, descendents, and appearances.

Fertility goddesses just like to get laid and see things grow. ;)
 
The first time she met Wilhelmine was actually the much, much bigger payout when she conned a good portion of the K8P Expedition mercenaries.
You say conned, I say merely drunkenly directed a crowd in a celebratory mood into unlicensed gambling via dubious props to confer authority, while operating as the House with an undeclared, nigh-untraceable, and exceptionally high House margin.
 
And then it occurred to me that might be a good indicator of what is arcane and what is divine lore that is at least halfway objective. If you are part of an arcane tradition, even one that is supported by a god then of course you can make new spells and adept those you see others cast, but if you are a priest and your power comes strictly from a god, then it is up to them what miracles get handed out, the list of spells is thus really resistant to change.

My understanding is that Mathildes MAPP has spread to a bunch of priests at this point, since as a neutral spell it can be done with divine magic, its been around for long enough for priests to become aware of it, and priests are in need of maps often enough that some of them have requested it from their gods and gotten it granted.
 
My understanding is that Mathildes MAPP has spread to a bunch of priests at this point, since as a neutral spell it can be done with divine magic, its been around for long enough for priests to become aware of it, and priests are in need of maps often enough that some of them have requested it from their gods and gotten it granted.
Off-hand I don't think Boney's said anything like that?
 
Off-hand I don't think Boney's said anything like that?

Mmm. Did a search and looks the same to me. There was a lot of speculation in-thread that priests might be able to use MAPP when it got codified, since the rest of the Petty and Lesser spell list is shared, but it doesn't look like that got confirmed in any way. I'd ask for WoG, but I suspect there's no in-character way for Mathilde to be able to know? Unless she asked a priest of Ranald about it at some point, I guess.
 
A Divided Loyalties Omake
End of the Road: Passing of the Torch
So, I was going through the apocrypha, catching up on omakes I've missed, and this one made me realize something. The Liber Mortis being Mathilde's great inheritance to her heirs—most likely Eike, yes—is… kinda weird.

Now, don't get me wrong. The thing has a lot of really nice knowledge, and gives people a pretty big apocalypse button, whether for causing or stopping it. And just having been in possession of the Liber Mortis is grounds for execution, which is a pretty hefty weight, to say nothing of it being Abelhelm's last charge. Yet for all of that, it is quite honestly the least important artifact in her story, and a poor legacy for some of those same reasons.

Where are the stories about Branalhune's inheritors, and it's legacy of service to Karak Eight Peaks and one of the eight commemorative swords? The Belt of the Unshackled Mountain, made in memory of when she tore down the black heart of Sylvania, and instrumental in her preventing another from forming? Or the Coin, a shard of stolen divinity that is both reward and responsible for her greatest feats and sacrifices in Ranald's service?

I don't know, maybe it's just me, but the big doom book that we read and then shoved in a box at the back of our metaphorical closet semi-permanently just doesn't strike me as the one thing Mathilde would consider her most important possession. A pretty big concern, yes, but not the most meaningful.
 
So, I was going through the apocrypha, catching up on omakes I've missed, and this one made me realize something. The Liber Mortis being Mathilde's great inheritance to her heirs—most likely Eike, yes—is… kinda weird.

Now, don't get me wrong. The thing has a lot of really nice knowledge, and gives people a pretty big apocalypse button, whether for causing or stopping it. And just having been in possession of the Liber Mortis is grounds for execution, which is a pretty hefty weight, to say nothing of it being Abelhelm's last charge. Yet for all of that, it is quite honestly the least important artifact in her story, and a poor legacy for some of those same reasons.

Where are the stories about Branalhune's inheritors, and it's legacy of service to Karak Eight Peaks and one of the eight commemorative swords? The Belt of the Unshackled Mountain, made in memory of when she tore down the black heart of Sylvania, and instrumental in her preventing another from forming? Or the Coin, a shard of stolen divinity that is both reward and responsible for her greatest feats and sacrifices in Ranald's service?

I don't know, maybe it's just me, but the big doom book that we read and then shoved in a box at the back of our metaphorical closet semi-permanently just doesn't strike me as the one thing Mathilde would consider her most important possession. A pretty big concern, yes, but not the most meaningful.
We just need to never die. it's Mathilde's problem, forever
 
Where are the stories about Branalhune's inheritors, and it's legacy of service to Karak Eight Peaks and one of the eight commemorative swords? The Belt of the Unshackled Mountain, made in memory of when she tore down the black heart of Sylvania, and instrumental in her preventing another from forming? Or the Coin, a shard of stolen divinity that is both reward and responsible for her greatest feats and sacrifices in Ranald's service?
I suspect the Belt will go back to the Dwarves, since it was mentioned that Kragg is unlikely to trust humans not in hammer-range with it easily.
And I don't think we'd want to give it to an apprentice or journeyman, particularly in combination with the Liber Mortis due to the obvious temptations.

The Coin is more a vehicle for Ranald's blessing than a magic item in its own right (we've seen divine power flow when it activates, that is no bound effect divorced from direct divine action) so it will propably loose its power or find its way wherever Ranald wants it. Not fully ours to give to anyone.

Only really interesting heirloom, aside from the book, to me is Branulhune.
 
I suspect the Belt will go back to the Dwarves, since it was mentioned that Kragg is unlikely to trust humans not in hammer-range with it easily.
And I don't think we'd want to give it to an apprentice or journeyman, particularly in combination with the Liber Mortis due to the obvious temptations.

The Coin is more a vehicle for Ranald's blessing than a magic item in its own right (we've seen divine power flow when it activates, that is no bound effect divorced from direct divine action) so it will propably loose its power or find its way wherever Ranald wants it. Not fully ours to give to anyone.

Only really interesting heirloom, aside from the book, to me is Branulhune.
Kragg didn't trust Mathilde back when he first met her. He is perfectly fine with her now, and he would be fine with her granting the Belt to her apprentice because that's how Dwarfs work. If you consider your apprentice worthy, no Dwarf is going to question you giving them your artifacts.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top