Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
The only ancestor rune so far we saw caused earth to split and great courage and fortitude in line of pikes. Dragon don ´t give a fuck about either, because it flies and no amount of courage beats fire (or ice in this case i guess) that literally halts greater daemons in their tracks. Is why i am asking, what can they do? Because so far what we saw of them was wide, battlefield changing effects that are powerful, but don ´t focus on direct firepower which is kind of what you need against a dragon.
It may be an effect of a regular Anvil Rune, but keep in mind the lightning Kragg summoned and rained down on the Greenskins.
 
So the thing is, in-setting, dwarves must have an answer to dragons, because Emperor dragons do not make a habit of taking over Karaks. I asked the thread if there's any lore occurrence in which a karak has fallen to a dragon, and the only thing people could cite was Thunder Mountain. So we're missing something about dwarf capabilities: obviously a dragon is a problem, but historically speaking greenskins and skaven are way more threatening to dwarfholds than dragons are.
My best guess is "small spaces + rune-weapons".
A Dragon can probably ravage any exterior Dawi holdings, but once you start fighting a fortified mountain you either somehow batter down a runic door that's backed by cannon and runic ballista, or you destroy the entire mountain. And even if you break down the door, the Dawi do have weapons that can hurt you and you're a huge creature trying to fight a bunch of smaller ones with deadly weapons inside a tunnel network.
 
Dwarves have plenty of Runes dedicated to the sole purpose of slaying dragons, chief among them the Master Rune of Dragon Slaying.
 
Last edited:
So the thing is, in-setting, dwarves must have an answer to dragons, because Emperor dragons do not make a habit of taking over Karaks. I asked the thread if there's any lore occurrence in which a karak has fallen to a dragon, and the only thing people could cite was Thunder Mountain. So we're missing something about dwarf capabilities: obviously a dragon is a problem, but historically speaking greenskins and skaven are way more threatening to dwarfholds than dragons are.

Well there's dragons being really rare on one hand and Karaks being hard to take especially for younger more active dragons on the other hand.

Greenskins have only not been a major problem for K8P because Mathilde has been consistently decapitating their leadership and because she and Kragg the Grim seriously hit the two attempts at a serious Waagh that the Expedition had encountered but lorewise greenskins can get quite tough to fight.
 
Dwarves have a mundane answer to dragons.

its called the cannon.
If only some extremely clever and, dare I say it, fantastically good-looking and well-read individual had recently obviated the need for Karak Eight Peaks's use of cannon in surface defense! Then we would have cannon to spare for anti-dragon duty!
 
I'm not entirely sure he would not, given that stark a choice, but doing so in the first place would be a significant blow to his trust in Mathilde. More to the point I would go so far as to call effectively blackmailing Belegar this way out of character as much if not more than using the Deciver on Kragg.
Blackmailing is 'do this or I'll release bad information about you'. I'm not really sure how that would apply to such a situation. Do you mean coerce? I agree that it wouldn't be looked upon well, but only because Mathilde is so good and useful; Belegar pays money to have Mathilde on call, so of course it wouldn't be reasonable to expect that he'd keep paying us if we weren't on call, but it wouldn't be coercive to request a sabbatical, only relatively blind to the realities of the Karak's situation.

Of course, at the end of the day, it's all in how you phrase it. 'Pay me to take a vacation' is bad, and worse when you really need somebody at the workplace or else things might literally burn down without them. 'As a master of my craft, I'd like to retire from this position, but still be located nearby to help out the Karak, of course, in order to delve into the greater mysteries that could make me a truly worthy grandmaster' is quite reasonable in comparison, as long as it comes at a time when there aren't eight fire-hazards in the Karak itself. Belegar knows how useful furthering our mastery is in the abstract sense; some real grandmasters just came down to Eight Peaks and built him an apocalypse weapon that utilizes the flames of dwarven hell.
 
Blackmailing is 'do this or I'll release bad information about you'. I'm not really sure how that would apply to such a situation. Do you mean coerce? I agree that it wouldn't be looked upon well, but only because Mathilde is so good and useful; Belegar pays money to have Mathilde on call, so of course it wouldn't be reasonable to expect that he'd keep paying us if we weren't on call, but it wouldn't be coercive to request a sabbatical, only relatively blind to the realities of the Karak's situation.

Of course, at the end of the day, it's all in how you phrase it. 'Pay me to take a vacation' is bad, and worse when you really need somebody at the workplace or else things might literally burn down without them. 'As a master of my craft, I'd like to retire from this position, but still be located nearby to help out the Karak, of course, in order to delve into the greater mysteries that could make me a truly worthy grandmaster' is quite reasonable in comparison, as long as it comes at a time when there aren't eight fire-hazards in the Karak itself. Belegar knows how useful furthering our mastery is in the abstract sense; some real grandmasters just came down to Eight Peaks and built him an apocalypse weapon that utilizes the flames of dwarven hell.

Blackmail in the broader sense is conditioning someone's safety, security or happiness on something they do not want to do. In that sense I do not think phrasing will help here. K8P is a symbol of hope and victory for Karaz Ankor yes, but it is also at this point in time in dire straights. As the dwarfs would see it there are skaven greenskins a dragon and who knows what horror movie monsters there. Saying 'you can let me go get training as a sabbatical or I quit' under those circumstances is nothing short of blackmail since you are forcing him to make due without a loremaster while in desperate straights yet keep the position open because it is still better than losing Mathilde for good.
 
Blackmailing is 'do this or I'll release bad information about you'. I'm not really sure how that would apply to such a situation. Do you mean coerce? I agree that it wouldn't be looked upon well, but only because Mathilde is so good and useful; Belegar pays money to have Mathilde on call, so of course it wouldn't be reasonable to expect that he'd keep paying us if we weren't on call, but it wouldn't be coercive to request a sabbatical, only relatively blind to the realities of the Karak's situation.

Of course, at the end of the day, it's all in how you phrase it. 'Pay me to take a vacation' is bad, and worse when you really need somebody at the workplace or else things might literally burn down without them. 'As a master of my craft, I'd like to retire from this position, but still be located nearby to help out the Karak, of course, in order to delve into the greater mysteries that could make me a truly worthy grandmaster' is quite reasonable in comparison, as long as it comes at a time when there aren't eight fire-hazards in the Karak itself. Belegar knows how useful furthering our mastery is in the abstract sense; some real grandmasters just came down to Eight Peaks and built him an apocalypse weapon that utilizes the flames of dwarven hell.
Well that'd be resigning, which we are free to do at any time
This is basically a case of not being able to have our cake and eat it too
Either we maintain our prestigious position at Belegar's council, which has it's benefits and responsibilities both
Or we resign from that position for more freedom of action

We can't be a member of the council and not have expected responsibilities to take care of
 
What if we discreetly infiltrate Karak Drahz and paint a giant "Ice Dragons ugly an' stinky" with a picture of a drooling dragon being pissed on by orcs on the side of the mountain?
 
Blackmailing is 'do this or I'll release bad information about you'. I'm not really sure how that would apply to such a situation. Do you mean coerce? I agree that it wouldn't be looked upon well, but only because Mathilde is so good and useful; Belegar pays money to have Mathilde on call, so of course it wouldn't be reasonable to expect that he'd keep paying us if we weren't on call, but it wouldn't be coercive to request a sabbatical, only relatively blind to the realities of the Karak's situation.

Of course, at the end of the day, it's all in how you phrase it. 'Pay me to take a vacation' is bad, and worse when you really need somebody at the workplace or else things might literally burn down without them. 'As a master of my craft, I'd like to retire from this position, but still be located nearby to help out the Karak, of course, in order to delve into the greater mysteries that could make me a truly worthy grandmaster' is quite reasonable in comparison, as long as it comes at a time when there aren't eight fire-hazards in the Karak itself. Belegar knows how useful furthering our mastery is in the abstract sense; some real grandmasters just came down to Eight Peaks and built him an apocalypse weapon that utilizes the flames of dwarven hell.

I don't know why so much discussion is going into this.

Are you asking the GM to include "Resign" or "Request a Sabbatical" on the next list of voting options? Is that the explicit request here?
 
To be fair, getting that mask would take quite a few AP, and we have very few of that... On the other hand, we have quite a few college favors and the means of getting more...

So it is understandable to try to get that problem solved via favors.

It's something Johann's already working on, if we can get some samples, we can probably spread it around and crack it as a side-project for everything else.

If we don't need magic to solve a problem, we shouldn't use it--especially when the proposed solution is the Wind we have in mind is the one that conflicts hardest with our own.
 
Blackmail in the broader sense is conditioning someone's safety, security or happiness on something they do not want to do.
No, it's strictly about the release of information. They're both bad, but coercion is what you're thinking of: 'persuade (an unwilling person) to do something by using force or threats.' The threat in this case being that we would stop helping them.
Saying 'you can let me go get training as a sabbatical or I quit'
I think we're talking about separate hypotheticals here.
Belegar pays money to have Mathilde on call, so of course it wouldn't be reasonable to expect that he'd keep paying us if we weren't on call,
Belegar shouldn't be paying for something he's not getting, I already said this.
it wouldn't be coercive to request a sabbatical, only relatively blind to the realities of the Karak's situation.
Mathilde wouldn't make such a statement in a malicious manner; with our favor and general mindset, it would require a genuinely large change in character for it to be anything other than us feeling a little too comfortable about the state of the Karak.
'Pay me to take a vacation' is bad, and worse when you really need somebody at the workplace or else things might literally burn down without them.
I agree that Mathilde shouldn't demand to stay on the payroll but not actually be helping him at all.
'As a master of my craft, I'd like to retire from this position, but still be located nearby to help out the Karak, of course, in order to delve into the greater mysteries that could make me a truly worthy grandmaster' is quite reasonable in comparison, as long as it comes at a time when there aren't eight fire-hazards in the Karak itself.
What I said was that we should be allowed to retire gracefully in less strenuous circumstances.
Are you asking the GM to include "Resign" or "Request a Sabbatical" on the next list of voting options? Is that the explicit request here?
I'm trying to explain what I perceived to be somebody else's reasoning. I'm suggesting nothing in particular myself, except the possibility that it might be costing us more to be an adviser than to be a Mathilde-y mountain hermit, which was another option we had at the end of the expedition.

'When Eight Peaks looks like it's not about to burn down because of the infinite armies of Skavendom' sounds like a good time to consider our next trajectory in life.
 
[X] [TOWER] Complete
[X] FIEF: Leave the current and future money be.
[X][PURCHASE] Firkin of top-quality dwarf ale for LM Olenus (5gc)

[X] Plan Present Concerns with Snek
[X] Plan Present Concerns With Cartography
[X] Plan Alphabetical
[X] Plan Penthesilea
Options for the option dwarf! Approval voting the plans with the most options presented. Because I want to see Mathilde going "Now that that's done, I have some ideas..." after the tower and Belegar looking at all the wizard bullshit falling into his lap, also it being his turn for a bit to have to pick one of a squillion options available. :tongue:
 
Are you asking the GM to include "Resign" or "Request a Sabbatical" on the next list of voting options? Is that the explicit request here?

Would request a Sabbatical be something Mathilde would consider IC?

Despite the turns being more action packed and having more updates than the pre-expedition turns Mathilde has still only been Loremaster for less than four years. Considering the backlog has been somewhat reduced at least in terms of papers written and training done and that Karak Eight Peaks is still in its formative stages it seems like a really awkward time to request a break.
 
I agree. It's not like Mathilde hasn't been jamming in quite a lot of personal projects as well. She learned a lot of magic over the past year and the Qeekish side project has been entirely hers.
 
Would request a Sabbatical be something Mathilde would consider IC?
Certainly not at the moment; You can't swing a cat without hitting a Skaven, there's an Emperor dragon in Ziflin, and one of the mountains might be legitimately haunted; whatever it is, it's managed to scare the pants off of greenskins, which is saying something.

But she might like the idea of just being able to sit down and burn through her backlog one day, when nothing is on fire.
 
[X] Plan Present Concerns
-[X] PROJECT: Queekish
-[X] PROJECT: Skaven Politics
-[X] PROJECT: Dragon
-[X] PROJECT: Karag Mhonar
 
I won't mind using the action that was given to learning magic over to research.

Certainly. For the matter 1 action can be given to exploration/figuring stuff out, 2 to Queekish (if that isn't chosen) and 1 to other research. Once Queekish is done and dusted even more focus can be shifted on AV research or Uglu tongs or other stuff.

At least the paper favour mill is neatly chugging along.
 
So I had a couple of thoughts for neat spells Mathilde could invent I don't really know how feasible they are but whatever.
A aoe spell that cause the shadows in the area to grapple and hold still people and animals in the effect.
A illusionary combatant that effect one creature but fights just a little bit better than the person it's cast on a training and distraction tool all in one
This could maybe be more like a ritual but creating basically living shadows that are loyal to their creator basically a warhammer version of shadows from kingdom hearts.
I don't know how feasible any of these are but I thought maybe the be interesting to someone.
 
Yeah, I think the in-character reasoning makes perfect sense. When we proposed it, we didn't know scouting would be Dreng's task for the turn or what he would find. Now that he's found stuff, it makes in-character sense for Mathilde, instead of proposing Cartographer again, to instead propose magical solutions to the things he found: dragon, horror movie, suspiciously quiescent skaven.

So the thing is, in-setting, dwarves must have an answer to dragons, because Emperor dragons do not make a habit of taking over Karaks. I asked the thread if there's any lore occurrence in which a karak has fallen to a dragon, and the only thing people could cite was Thunder Mountain. So we're missing something about dwarf capabilities: obviously a dragon is a problem, but historically speaking greenskins and skaven are way more threatening to dwarfholds than dragons are.

Sure the answer is either various hero units with unique equipment (I think dragon slayer is one of the highest "specifications" of slayer we get in canon) or large scale armies with lot of siegeweapons and a willingness to accept significant casualties. Its just that losing a large number of troops to the dragon makes us weak to the other factions which is why I think a smarter solution would be nice.

And the reason why dragons are less of a threat than orks or skaven is that there are far fewer of them and that most of them have better things to do than to risk their lives and attack some of the strongest fortifications in the world. I mean there is a reason why the big dragons that did so that we know of are generally chaos tainted.


And I have to say that I doubt there will ever be a time in the near or medium future where K8P will be truly safe/problem free unless the GM goes really easy on us. At the end of the day K8P is an outpost deep in enemy territory that is both a strategic as well as political target for nearly ever "evil" faction there is.

Edit:
Though that doesn't mean that I think that it would be OC or even unlikely that Mathilde wpuld sooner or later tire of her duties and long for something else. Having to constantly fight for your life has to be a terrible psychological burden.
 
Last edited:
Considering the dragon is on the highest most inaccessible peak, behind Skyre lines why poke him at the moment?

There's basically everything else that is more immediate either as a concern or as an opportunity, so why try to tackle the dragon?
 
Voting is open
Back
Top