Sounds like the Lore of Light's wheelhouse. How bitter are we toward Sunshine's order?Before I head off to bed, an idea:
Runes are a method of forcing magical energy into a static form, such that they will give the same result under all conditions. They are very different from other forms of magic. However they remain fundamentally just a way of getting magic to do a specific thing. Thus it follows that any effect a Rune can produce can also be produced by other methods of manipulating magic. Mathilda is in possession of a Runic belt that (amongst other functions) is able to destroy Dhar. Figuring out how to reproduce that effect would grant a potent weapon, and defence, against all those that wield Dhar. Even if only another of the eight Winds can manage it, it is still something that the Collage could do with knowing.
Discuss.
tho in a weird way it would have made this vote easerHatred Mathilde would have been a very... amusing outcome to imagine. Amusing in the sense that we would probably have to face Waaghs directed at Mathilde every decade or so.
We are not dealing with scenario: all Orks gain hatred: Mathilde, but the fact that we're not dealing with scenario: Ork-goblin civil war didn't stop one from starting up on our doorstep, and while we know that the OOC reason for them all turning on us was a nat 100 on their reaction IC it could easily be due to Mork giving them a general target. Add in the hands of Mork beating the shit out of them for failing to get to us/the expedition and I think it's fair to say there are decent odds Mork lays at least some of the blame on the expedition...Greenskin gods ain't omniscient, and we avoided the outcome where they pin down Mathilde as being the one responsible.
By all indication, Mork got mugged while his back was turned, taken for all he's worth, and he's just lashing out generically.
Because if they had any idea who was responsible, we would have been dealing with giant fists punching us from where we were, not what happened where they were punching more greenskins.
Firstly, I haven't seen a single person talking about romancing Belegar, because that would be pretty silly, secondly, I was under the impression that we were playing as a human in this quest, rather than some perfectly logical robot.Seems logic and pragmatism isn't sufficient to overcome the 'he is our replacement waifu' factor.
A shame.
slayers are predominantly caused by broken oaths, which are sometimes impossible to keep, not just the fact that there are grudges in the book of grudges.Grudges without any way of paying them off tend to create Slayers, to my understanding. If the idea that Dwarves can not only join Chaos but also create new, worse types of Grobi becomes known, it might well create a hell of a lot of new Slayers.
Can we narrow an effectively infinite list of possibilities down?We are not dealing with scenario: all Orks gain hatred: Mathilde, but the fact that we're not dealing with scenario: Ork-goblin civil war didn't stop one from starting up on our doorstep, and while we know that the OOC reason for them all turning on us was a nat 100 on their reaction IC it could easily be due to Mork giving them a general target. Add in the hands of Mork beating the shit out of them for failing to get to us/the expedition and I think it's fair to say there are decent odds Mork lays at least some of the blame on the expedition...
I'm not really a fan of the way most Silence voters have gone about making their arguments, but after reading your post I've reluctantly come around to acknowledging that it may just be better to be silent this time anyways. Even the appearance of vote relitigation can cause justifiably sore feelings that I've been on the other end of, and the dwarves don't know enough to understand why us telling them this makes us so cool, so even if I were only going for a total ego-vote it wouldn't really be that fun to win and get the best case result.Initially I was on the side of 'tell' because it sounded interesting, but while it's hard to follow all the fast-moving arguments, I've come around to 'Remain Silent'.
(I've also come around to the 'this was narrowly rejected once and shouldn't have been opened up to vote for a second time', but reasons have been given.)
There are no real benefits to disclosing yet more perfidy from the Chaos Dwarves and adding to the never-payable Grudge burden on the Karaz Ankor, including King Belegar.
I see no benefit to admitting we were possessed by Mork. Mork is always going to be a factor as long as a Waagh can get going, nursing sore feelings at us or Ranald or the world, or not.
Belegar won't really care about how 'clever' we were in channeling greenskin power to boost Ranald, who as a discouraged god I don't expect they'll know much about at all. Belegar wasn't sure what a Magister was, his knowledge of the fringes of the human pantheon may also be lacking. Kragg even more so.
In the 'remain silent' corner is affecting our level of trust- perhaps not in the way you think.
Are we still a trustworthy agent, or one they have to watch for Morky influences?
On top of this, it seems to be strongly the Grey College practise and training *not* to speak, unless you're sure of the effect of what you're saying.
This information- as it means full disclosure- is a real wildcard.
[X] Remain silent.
[X] 'Make sure the ale hasn't gone bad' with Skaroki
[X] Join the hunting with Sigwald Kriegersen
[X] Telling war stories
[X] Gambling
[X] Being maudlin
[X] Yes to Shenanigans
The wiki says stuff like, "The loss of a single family member or a hoard of treasures is inconsolable to a Dwarf, a fate that can seriously unhinge their obsessive minds. Eventually these burdens become far to heavy to bear, and a Dwarf would eventually snap, making him forswear the fellowship and comforts of family, clan, and hold, opting instead for a life of self-imposed exile. They take the Slayer Oath."slayers are predominantly caused by broken oaths, which are sometimes impossible to keep, not just the fact that there are grudges in the book of grudges.
Slayers have become slayers for failure alone.Firstly, I haven't seen a single person talking about romancing Belegar, because that would be pretty silly, secondly, I was under the impression that we were playing as a human in this quest, rather than some perfectly logical robot.
slayers are predominantly caused by broken oaths, which are sometimes impossible to keep, not just the fact that there are grudges in the book of grudges.
I think the arguement style is actually are real issue. I feel like the ... friendliness of the discourse has been getting worse. Maybe it's because people get really into Important Decisions, but I kinda want something inconsequential for an update or two just so people can calm down a little.I'm not really a fan of the way most Silence voters have gone about making their arguments, but after reading your post I've reluctantly come around to acknowledging that it may just be better to be silent this time anyways. Even the appearance of vote relitigation can cause justifiably sore feelings that I've been on the other end of, and the dwarves don't know enough to understand why us telling them this makes us so cool, so even if I were only going for a total ego-vote it wouldn't really be that fun to win and get the best case result.
Yet another argument for the "Remain silent" vote, if you think about it.
I will admit that the longer it went I started getting more heated then making the best arguments.I'm not really a fan of the way most Silence voters have gone about making their arguments, but after reading your post I've reluctantly come around to acknowledging that it may just be better to be silent this time anyways. Even the appearance of vote relitigation can cause justifiably sore feelings that I've been on the other end of, and the dwarves don't know enough to understand why us telling them this makes us so cool, so even if I were only going for a total ego-vote it wouldn't really be that fun to win and get the best case result.
[X] Remain silent.
[X] Hold a Ranaldan religious service
In the future, though, we've definitely got to use the Protector side of the coin. Boosting our fame is profitable and enjoyable, and we deserve more credit for all the things we end up accidentally risking our lives to do.
that is due to the king and company feeling that they had failed in their oaths as king and company, which is an entirely different thing from "our enemies did something bad at some point lets go be slayers"Slayers have become slayers for failure alone.
When Neferata and her brood attacked the Silver Pinnacle the king and his surviving warriors and bodyguards became slayers before their last fight for failing their hold, people, and families.
Slayers are made because of shame, which encompasses more than just oaths.
The Most 'Ated 'UmieHatred Mathilde would have been a very... amusing outcome to imagine. Amusing in the sense that we would probably have to face Waaghs directed at Mathilde every decade or so.
I think it's mainly tied to this being a vote tied to a very divisive vote that literally just happened.I think the arguement style is actually are real issue. I feel like the ... friendliness of the discourse has been getting worse. Maybe it's because people get really into Important Decisions, but I kinda want something inconsequential for an update or two just so people can calm down a little.
Funny, but I think Mathilde would rather leader the orcs on a merry chase through the territory of the mother of all vampires. She is from Stirland, after all.