Godwinson
"Well, I've got nothing."
Yes-Yes, Under-Minister!
Yes-Yes, Under-Minister!
Because it is what they are there for?Honestly, I never understood the hype about lawmen being the One True Loremaster type. Runesmiths and engineers are tapped about as often, and Mathilde can be described as a runesmith stand-in with a particulary radical engineer's sensibilities and care for traditions.
And...?Because it is what they are there for?
To know the general lore about tradition, history, grudges, diplomacy, and almost everything not specific to someone else, poking weird shit is only one facet of it.
As useful as Mathilde may be, she can't do most of the actual day to day loremaster job, and the moment you no longer have weird shit that desperately needs poking at, a traditional loremaster starts looking lot more useful.
I'm against. The transitional turn is for tying up loose ends (like the papers from the expedition) and continuing incremental projects (like the sword style). Not for seeking out yet more secrets we don't have the time and attention to actually investigate.Unrelated to the current vote, I hope we decide to poke around the Lhune depths.
Because it is what they are there for?
To know the general lore about tradition, history, grudges, diplomacy, and almost everything not specific to someone else, poking weird shit is only one facet of it.
As useful as Mathilde may be, she can't do most of the actual day to day loremaster job, and the moment you no longer have weird shit that desperately needs poking at, a traditional loremaster starts looking lot more useful.
It could be. Boney said that the first decision we make on the project would be "under whose aegis do we do this."I've been wondering about that. Couldn't the Waystone project be done under Belegar's autority, the title of Loremaster would sure be useful to secure dwarven collaboration and such a project would be a decent way for K8P to project diplomatic power.
Yeah, I could support that.An pre-agreement that we will, within the first few years, take 100ish days leave to at last become one of the very, very few humans to step foot on Ulthuan, for our Elfcation.
I genuinely and seriously appreciate you putting a lid on your negative feelings for the sake of thread harmony.I am still very bitter, I just don't want to be vocal about it and bring down the thread. So I'll say no more about it.
My technique for "speeding through Boney's comments" isn't to use search; it's to go page-by-page and use CTRL F (or CMD F if you're on a Mac) for "ko-fi", which gets Boney's signature. If no hits, you can just advance to the next page.Alright, only 40 more pages of Boney's comments. I'm hoping his responses alone will give me a decent enough overview of the thread discussion throughout this Expedition. Too bad you can't get SV to display the full comment on search though. Would make this whole thing speedier.
I think the thread has really overblown the degree to which A Proper Loremaster Handles Laws and we are letting Belegar down. Think about it like a more conventional CK2 quest; Belegar could use his Learning slot on a history & law-focused Loremaster and spend his personal actions hobnobbing with his fellow monarchs to boost his standing, or he could use his Learning slot on a weird-shit-problem-solver-and-high-tier-hero and spend his personal actions resolving any legal or cultural disputes that come up. I would strenuously oppose the Loremaster Sinecure, but Loremaster-at-Large definitely provides huge amounts of value for Belegar by repaying his debts to the wider Karaz Ankor (or putting his brother-kings and sister-queen in his debt), and I don't think it costs Belegar actions so much as "shifting around what he does on his own time vs what his advisors take care of."
I mean if Loremaster wins, we will be poking weird things through all of the Karaz Ankor... And that would include K8P from time to time, so we may very well end up researching the Deeps.I'm against. The transitional turn is for tying up loose ends (like the papers from the expedition) and continuing incremental projects (like the sword style). Not for seeking out yet more secrets we don't have the time and attention to actually investigate.
And I hope that Loremaster win and Waysone loses...Well 244 other people are tired of Dwarfs. Hope loremaster loses
After the original list of options came out and we started voting on it, I spent a reasonable amount of time going through the list, thinking about all the ones I didn't want to win, imagining a world in which it had won, and trying to figure out "what aspects of the quest would I still really like" and "what unique aspects of this option would I appreciate despite my opposition to the option as a whole." It was a very good exercise for settling the anxiety that comes with emotional investment in an interactive piece of fiction, and I highly recommend it.I would sincerely suggest that everyone voting start getting comfortable now with their un-favorite options winning. Just... relax.
Yes. And?And...?
It is obvious that 247 people (myself included) don´t really care about legal technycisms like that...
We like Belelgar, we like K8P, we like the new possibilities of our job, we like working with Dwarfs, so that is why we are voting for it.
Not having a law/precedent guru should be, i think, fairly exceptional for a king.I think the point is that this is pigeonholing the advisor slot into a narrower set of responsibilities than it actually contains room for (and not even just as a special Mathilde exception, as Kornet mentioned, not having a Law/Precedent Guru there isn't actually even uncommon.). I was pretty ready to retire from the position previously when I felt the opportunities had dried up, but once the actual At-Large job specifics were explained in more detail it seems pretty clear that the room for Mathilde's niche to usefully contribute hasn't actually closed. As an example, at the end of the day it doesn't necessarily matter if a clan decides to immigrate because of impeccably cited precedent, or because they all thought it was pretty rad the way K8P managed to kick those dragons out of Zhufbar.
I don't think it is overblown, as such, it is quite possible that the current situation will keep on working fine for decades, or it might not.It could be. Boney said that the first decision we make on the project would be "under whose aegis do we do this."
Yeah, I could support that.
I genuinely and seriously appreciate you putting a lid on your negative feelings for the sake of thread harmony.
My technique for "speeding through Boney's comments" isn't to use search; it's to go page-by-page and use CTRL F (or CMD F if you're on a Mac) for "ko-fi", which gets Boney's signature. If no hits, you can just advance to the next page.
I think the thread has really overblown the degree to which A Proper Loremaster Handles Laws and we are letting Belegar down. Think about it like a more conventional CK2 quest; Belegar could use his Learning slot on a history & law-focused Loremaster and spend his personal actions hobnobbing with his fellow monarchs to boost his standing, or he could use his Learning slot on a weird-shit-problem-solver-and-high-tier-hero and spend his personal actions resolving any legal or cultural disputes that come up. I would strenuously oppose the Loremaster Sinecure, but Loremaster-at-Large definitely provides huge amounts of value for Belegar by repaying his debts to the wider Karaz Ankor (or putting his brother-kings and sister-queen in his debt), and I don't think it costs Belegar actions so much as "shifting around what he does on his own time vs what his advisors take care of."
I disagree, and not just because I do not want loremaster.I think the point is that this is pigeonholing the advisor slot into a narrower set of responsibilities than it actually contains room for (and not even just as a special Mathilde exception, as Kornet mentioned, not having a Law/Precedent Guru there isn't actually even uncommon.). I was pretty ready to retire from the position previously when I felt the opportunities had dried up, but once the actual At-Large job specifics were explained in more detail it seems pretty clear that the room for Mathilde's niche to usefully contribute hasn't actually closed. As an example, at the end of the day it doesn't necessarily matter if a clan decides to immigrate because of impeccably cited precedent, or because they all thought it was pretty rad the way K8P managed to kick those dragons out of Zhufbar.
Too late I drowned in the salt 50 votes ago and am now a vaguely unhappy soup.I would sincerely suggest that everyone voting start getting comfortable now with their un-favorite options winning. Just... relax.
After the original list of options came out and we started voting on it, I spent a reasonable amount of time going through the list, thinking about all the ones I didn't want to win, imagining a world in which it had won, and trying to figure out "what aspects of the quest would I still really like" and "what unique aspects of this option would I appreciate despite my opposition to the option as a whole." It was a very good exercise for settling the anxiety that comes with emotional investment in an interactive piece of fiction, and I highly recommend it.
That's true, but:There is no real plot line we are signing up for with loremaster , just the promise of 'things'
The underlying goals for Loremaster are 'raise Belegar's standing in the Karak Ankor' and to a lesser extent 'give dwarves hope'. You can frame any option negatively or as ultimately goalless (bodyguard: 'potter around the empire on random adventures', waystones: 'try and look busy while flitting between people you know will never work together', etc) but that doesn't make it true.I disagree, and not just because I do not want loremaster.
The list of 'things we can do' as loremaster at large feel very 'here are some small things to do while Boney thinks up and actual plot.'
Again, loremaster-at-large doesn't have an underlining goal like the other options do.
Edgelord= Kill vampires, save a province
Bodyguard: protect a prince, protect? And empire.
Waystones: find lore, save the world.
Loremaster: potter around, help?
There is no real plot line we are signing up for with loremaster , just the promise of 'things'
It's only in 5th place, it can stage a comeback.What I want is Tactical Espionage Action. And the Waystone project has the least of that. Wissenland has the most, but alas it hasn't a chance.
That's true, but:
- There are the existing large plot threads in the quest that we can tug at, like "what's the deal with gods being places that they shouldn't be"
Isn't the answer for this simply protect / help the Karag anchor in dealing with the things they are too homebound to deal with themselves and improve the standing of eight peaks in the eyes of the other holds.I disagree, and not just because I do not want loremaster.
The list of 'things we can do' as loremaster at large feel very 'here are some small things to do while Boney thinks up and actual plot.'
Again, loremaster-at-large doesn't have an underlining goal like the other options do.
Edgelord= Kill vampires, save a province
Bodyguard: protect a prince, protect? And empire.
Waystones: find lore, save the world.
Loremaster: potter around, help?
There is no real plot line we are signing up for with loremaster , just the promise of 'things'
It's behind by about 100 votes. I don't particularly like it's odds.
My point is that knowing shit about laws and traditions is also just one facet, and one a lot of loremasters are frankly incompetent at.Because it is what they are there for?
To know the general lore about tradition, history, grudges, diplomacy, and almost everything not specific to someone else, poking weird shit is only one facet of it.
As useful as Mathilde may be, she can't do most of the actual day to day loremaster job, and the moment you no longer have weird shit that desperately needs poking at, a traditional loremaster starts looking lot more useful.
I tho k your joking, but just in case.