- Location
- Deep in a bog
Eh... it's fine, not broken up about it.
AFAIK, this sort of theory of state-organization-optimizing of magic at scale stems in large part from D&D 3e, which was quite ambitious about having rules for Number And Level Of NPC Casters By City, and various kinds of state organization detail and setting building and rules codification and using magic outside of PC hands; and had a dedicated forum of optimizers --I agree that the spell is written to be a plot hook. Generally spells in TRPG land are written to be useful for the game (small scale tactical combat) first and worldbuilding....incredibly low on the list if on the list at all. See how theoretically broken Scry and Die should be for any setting with sufficiently high fantasy and anything resembling large state organizations.
Thats a RWBY crossover weapon.
"This novelty hollow-bladed axe with hinged cutting edge conceals five gun barrels using matchlock and wheellock ignition systems. A sixth barrel forms the handle. It was purchased for the Tower Armories on Saturday 2 April 1825 from Mrs Brooks, Old Bond Street, descibed as the property of a Bavarian nobleman."
This is Nuln Engineering af. How do we get one
We should definitely get someone to call overcast Comet of Cassandora on Karak Drazh, this will definitely create no issues at all.I got a massive spell list on my High Elf Archmage in the current WHF campaign I'm playing in. And she approaches every single situation with 'How could Comet of Casandora solve all my problems' which is more often then not, yes. We still had to trim the various spell lists cause on God they didn't play test some of these spells. (Playing a bunch of really high level characters in WHF is pretty fun NGL, already done the start as ratcatcher like three times in other games).
"This novelty hollow-bladed axe with hinged cutting edge conceals five gun barrels using matchlock and wheellock ignition systems. A sixth barrel forms the handle. It was purchased for the Tower Armories on Saturday 2 April 1825 from Mrs Brooks, Old Bond Street, descibed as the property of a Bavarian nobleman."
This is Nuln Engineering af. How do we get one
the pedantic DM part of me would say that the material component is *incredibly* key to gatekeeping the spell.WFRP 2e: Realms of Sorcery page 146, Burning Vengeance
I thought there was a line of sight requirement for this spell, but nah, just names. I then went to see if spells required line of sight by default like in 4e, but no, in 2e the default is that line of sight is needed only for magic missiles.
How does the Empire have enemies when it can just get them to all kill each other?
That's the Funny reaction - it's a person screaming.
It's optional.the pedantic DM part of me would say that the material component is *incredibly* key to gatekeeping the spell.
A. You need *three* drops of blood of the precise same specific size and shape.
B. the difficulty of acquiring that blood is going to scale with the importance of the target. Which scales further when various *ichors* stop being classically "blood"
C. You need to preserve the blood in a manner that keeps it from coagulating or becoming too distant to be classified as "blood", and that you can deliver the *same specific size and shape* of the droplet.
Putting it in a gift basket full of blood is weird but I'll allow it.It's optional.
Like, it brings the casting number down to the realm of possibility for a Magister, and makes it almost reliable for a Lord Magister, but if you want to just go for it it's not necessary.
( Also it doesn't specify identical drops and that's kind of a weird conclusion to jump to. At that point, as a GM, you can just say no.
Like, in the Tome of Corruption there's a cursed artifact that gives you +3 to casting rolls if you put it in a bowl of blood, but anyone who says that the evil magic inside of it isn't going to accept a similarly sized pan or dish or receptacle of blood is just being silly. This is like that. )
I believe Boney said it eventually faded without being renewed.Do we still have that cipher table from our previous work as a patsy for the Lamian Conspiracy still shine when we close our eyes? Or did we get rid of that at some point?
In WFRP, spell ingredients just make the spell easier/less likely to miscastA. You need *three* drops of blood of the precise same specific size and shape.
B. the difficulty of acquiring that blood is going to scale with the importance of the target. Which scales further when various *ichors* stop being classically "blood"
C. You need to preserve the blood in a manner that keeps it from coagulating or becoming too distant to be classified as "blood", and that you can deliver the *same specific size and shape* of the droplet.
Pre-quest Mathilde had used ingredients to learn Shadowsteed, and iirc in-quest she used Black Lotus early on for Burning Shadows? She certainly mentioned it, but I don't know if she actually used any. (If it didn't show up in expenses, probably not...)All of Mathilde's Grey spells have technically ingredients too, she's just never used any
Of course, in the RPG doing that is going to end up with Tzeentch's curse.In WFRP, spell ingredients just make the spell easier/less likely to miscast
They aren't actually required to cast a spell
So those three drops of blood aren't needed, they're just nice to have
So a caster could in fact just sit down in the safety of their living room and cast the "instant war" spell ad infinitum until their target fails their will save if they're skilled enough
All of Mathilde's Grey spells technically have ingredients too, she's just never used any
I think she used something for Magic Dart or Sleep early on in the quest also?Pre-quest Mathilde had used ingredients to learn Shadowsteed, and iirc in-quest she used Black Lotus early on for Burning Shadows? She certainly mentioned it, but I don't know if she actually used any. (If it didn't show up in expenses, probably not...)
You smile at the last; Gretel had filled a few vials with greenskin blood during the previous day's excursions, and it seems she's been putting them to use as foci for the spell she's not yet got a reliable grip on. You smile nostalgically, remembering the times when you would fall back on components to carry some of the weight of your spellcasting, and the strange looks you got from farriers until you found one willing to collect hoof trimmings from a courier's horse.
I wonder how much safer material components would make battle magic? Never actually safe, but safer is still helpful.
16% difference. 40.05% for 4d10+3, 66.28% for 4d10+7, at least according to Anydice.Without the material component, you'd need to roll at least a 6 on each dice, so it's about a 5% difference.
Only if they've reached a high enough Magic score.The real takeaway is that we should be happy Boney lets wizards cast sub-BM spells (and in Mathilde's case, fog-based BM) 'safely', after the first time rolling them in battle/stressful situations.
16% difference. 40.05% for 4d10+3, 66.28% for 4d10+7, at least according to Anydice.
It doesn't need changing, it just needs to not be poked. It works perfectly fine for a roleplaying game where magic is hard and casting it even once requires you to be one of the strongest and best trained wizards in the empire and could cost you your life.To offer an alternative solution for burning vengeance, what if the spell worked with Dresden Files name rules?
Like, in the Dresden Files, getting someone's true name is quite hard, because not only must you know their full name, you must know the way they say their full name, so unless you hear someone introducing themselves with their full name (and most wizards are canny enough to never introduce themselves with their full name, even if their full name is known, Harry himself having 2 middle names is somewhat useful for that reason), you do not have their true name.
That would solve most the problems while preserving the story hooks.